The methodological approach used to develop the 2013 pain, agitation, and delirium clinical practice guidelines for adult ICU patients

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 9 SUPPL.1, 2013, Pages

  Barr, Juliana ^a,b   Kishman, Charles P ^c   Jaeschke, Roman ^d  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VA PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^d ST JOSEPH S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

agitation; critical care; delirium; Development and Evaluation; Grading of Recommendations Assessment; guidelines; intensive care; outcomes; pain; psychometric; sedation

Indexed keywords

BENZODIAZEPINE; LORAZEPAM; MIDAZOLAM; MORPHINE;

AGITATION; AROUSAL; BREATHING; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DATA BASE; DELIRIUM; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; HYGIENE; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SEDATION; SLEEP;

ADULT; ADVISORY COMMITTEES; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; CONSENSUS; DELIRIUM; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; INTENSIVE CARE; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; PAIN MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOMOTOR AGITATION;

EID: 84883577957     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a167d7     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, et al; American College of Critical Care Medicine: Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:263-306
2. Jacobi J, Fraser GL, Coursin DB, et al; Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP), American College of Chest Physicians: Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:119-141
3. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al: GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64:395-400
4. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al; GRADE Working Group: What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 2008; 336:995-998
5. Davidson JE, Tung A, Kishman CP Jr, et al: Reflecting on use of the GRADE process for development of the 2013 PAD guidelines. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 34:262-272
6. Schünemann HJ, Jaeschke R, Cook DJ, et al; ATS Documents Development and Implementation Committee: An official ATS statement: Grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174:605-614
7. Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH, et al: Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: Report from an American college of chest physicians task force. Chest 2006; 129:174-181
8. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al; GRADE Working Group: GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336:924-926
9. Pudas-Tähkä SM, Axelin A, Aantaa R, et al: Pain assessment tools for unconscious or sedated intensive care patients: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2009; 65:946-956
10. Streiner DL, Norman GR: Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Fourth Edition. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008
11. Gélinas C, Puntillo KA, Joffe AM, et al: A validated approach to evaluating psychometric properties of pain assessment tools for use in non-verbal critically ill adults. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 34:153-168
12. Robinson BR, Berube M, Barr J, et al: Psychometric analysis of subjective sedation scales in critically ill adults. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:S16-S29
13. Allen J, Dyas J, Jones M: Building consensus in health care: A guide to using the nominal group technique. Br J Community Nurs 2004; 9:110-114
14. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al; GRADE Working Group: Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336:1049-1051
15. Cross H: Consensus methods: A bridge between clinical reasoning and clinical research? Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis 2005; 73:28-32
16. McGinnis PQ, Wainwright SF, Hack LM, et al: Use of a Delphi panel to establish consensus for recommended uses of selected balance assessment approaches. Physiother Theory Pract 2010; 26:358-373
17. Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, et al: Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2:i-iv, 1
18. Linstone HA, Turoff M: The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 2002
19. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P, et al; GRADE Working Group: Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ 2008; 337:a744
20. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al; International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee; American Association of Critical-Care Nurses; American College of Chest Physicians; American College of Emergency Physicians; Canadian Critical Care Society; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; European Respiratory Society; International Sepsis Forum; Japanese Association for Acute Medicine; Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care Medicine; Society of Hospital Medicine; Surgical Infection Society; World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:296-327
21. Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, et al: Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit: Executive summary. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2013; 70:53-58
22. Fraser GL, Devlin JW, Worby CP, et al: Benzodiazepine versus nonbenzodiazepine-based sedation for mechanically ventilated, critically ill adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:S30-S38
23. Nasraway SA Jr, Jacobi J, Murray MJ, et al; Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, American College of Chest Physicians: Sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blockade of the critically ill adult: Revised clinical practice guidelines for 2002. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:117-118
24. Field MJ, Lohr KN, Institute of Medicine (U.S.), et al: Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1990
25. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al; GRADE Working Group: Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328:1490
26. Graham R, Institute of Medicine (U.S.): Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines: Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2011
27. Klem ML, Weiss PM: Evidence-based resources and the role of librarians in developing evidence-based practice curricula. J Prof Nurs 2005; 21:380-387
28. Rankin JA, Grefsheim SF, Canto CC: The emerging informationist specialty: A systematic review of the literature. J Med Libr Assoc 2008; 96:194-206
29. Wade CA, Turner HM, Rothstein HR, et al: Information retrieval and the role of the information specialist in producing high-quality systematic reviews in the social, behavioural and education sciences. Evid Policy 2006; 2:89-108
30. Gardois P, Calabrese R, Colombi N, et al: Effectiveness of bibliographic searches performed by paediatric residents and interns assisted by librarians. A randomised controlled trial. Health Info Libr J 2011; 28:273-284
31. Gruppen LD, Rana GK, Arndt TS: A controlled comparison study of the efficacy of training medical students in evidence-based medicine literature searching skills. Acad Med 2005; 80:940-944
32. Sampson M, McGowan J: Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59:1057-1063
33. Medical Library Association: Role of expert searching in health sciences libraries. J Med Libr Assoc 2005; 93:42-44
34. Kuehn BM: IOM sets out "gold standard" practices for creating guidelines, systematic reviews. JAMA 2011; 305:1846-1848
35. Atkins D, Briss PA, Eccles M, et al; GRADE Working Group: Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res 2005; 5:25
36. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric Subgroup: Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:580-637
37. Barr J, Pandharipande P: The pain, agitation, and delirium care bundle: Synergistic benefits of implementing the 2013 pain, agitation, and delirium guidelines in an integrated and interdisciplinary fashion. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:S99-S115