The effect of pH on the toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles to Folsomia candida in amended field soil

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2349-2355

  Waalewijn Kool, Pauline L ^a   Ortiz, Maria Diez ^b   Lofts, Stephen ^b   Van Gestel, Cornelis A M ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bioavailability; Folsomia candida; Soil pH; Zinc oxide nanoparticle

Indexed keywords

BIOAVAILABILITY; CALCIUM LEVELS; EFFECTIVE CONCENTRATION; FOLSOMIA CANDIDA; POREWATER CONCENTRATIONS; PROTECTIVE EFFECTS; SOIL PH; ZINC OXIDE NANOPARTICLES;

BIOCHEMISTRY; CALCIUM; NANOPARTICLES; PARTICLE SIZE; SOILS; TOXICITY; ZINC; ZINC OXIDE;

PH EFFECTS;

CALCIUM; NANOPARTICLE; ZINC OXIDE;

BIOAVAILABILITY; CALCIUM; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENTOMOLOGY; INSECT; ISOTHERM; PH; POREWATER; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; SOIL AMENDMENT; SOIL FAUNA; SORPTION; TOXICITY TEST; ZINC;

ARTICLE; CALCIUM BLOOD LEVEL; FOLSOMIA CANDIDA; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTION; SOIL; TOXICITY TESTING;

BIOAVAILABILITY; FOLSOMIA CANDIDA; SOIL PH; ZINC OXIDE NANOPARTICLE;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; CHLORIDES; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; NANOPARTICLES; PARTICLE SIZE; REPRODUCTION; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANTS; ZINC COMPOUNDS; ZINC OXIDE;

DORSET [ENGLAND]; ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

FOLSOMIA CANDIDA;

EID: 84883556017     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.2302     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Handy RD, von der Kammer F, Lead JR, Hassellöv M, Owen R, Crane M. 2008. The ecotoxicity and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17:287-314.
2. Tourinho PS, van Gestel CAM, Lofts S, Svendsen C, Soares AMVM, Loureiro S. 2012. Metal-based nanoparticles in soil: Fate, behaviour, and effects on soil invertebrates. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:1-14.
3. Baalousha M, Mancuilea A, Cumberland S, Kendall K, Lead JR. 2008. Aggregations and surface properties of ions oxide NPs: Influence of pH and natural organic matter. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1875-2008.
4. Waalewijn-Kool PL, Diez Ortiz M, van Straalen NM, van Gestel CAM. 2013. Sorption, dissolution and pH determine the long-term equilibration and toxicity of coated and uncoated ZnO nanoparticles in soil. Environ Pollut 178:59-64.
5. Osmond MJ, McCall MJ. 2010. Zinc oxide nanoparticles in modern sunscreens: An analysis of potential exposure and hazard. Nanotoxicology 4:15-41.
6. Kamat PV, Huehn R, Nicolaescu R. 2002. A "sense and shoot" approach for photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants in water. J Phys Chem 106:788-794.
7. Hooper HL, Jurkschat K, Morgan AJ, Bailey J, Lawlor AJ, Spurgeon DJ, Svendsen C. 2011. Comparative chronic toxicity of nanoparticulate and ionic zinc to the earthworm Eisenia veneta in a soil matrix. Environ Int 37:1111-1117.
8. 2) to earthworms (Eisenia fetida). J Environ Monit 13:3351-3357.
9. 2 solution. Toxicology 269:198-203.
10. 2 to Folsomia candida (Collembola) in relation to bioavailability in soil. Environ Pollut 159:2713-2719.
11. Waalewijn-Kool PL, Diez Ortiz M, van Gestel CAM. 2012. Effect of different spiking procedures on the distribution and toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles in soil. Ecotoxicology 21:1797-1804.
12. 2 and ZnO nanoparticles negatively affect wheat growth and soil enzyme activities in agricultural soil. J Environ Monit 13:822-828.
13. Priester JH, Ge Y, Mielke RE, Horst AM, Moritz SC, Espinosa K, Gelb J, Walkerg SL, Nisbet RM, Ani Y-J, Schimel JP, Palmer RG, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Zhao L, Gardea-Torresdey JL, Holden PA. 2012. Soybean susceptibility to manufactured nanomaterials with evidence for food quality and soil fertility interruption. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:E2451-E2456.
14. Dimkpa CO, Calder A, Britt DW, McLean JE, Anderson AJ. 2011. Responses of a soil bacterium, Pseudomonas chlororaphis, O6 to commercial metal oxide nanoparticles compared with responses to metal ions. Environ Pollut 159:1749-1756.
15. Sandifer RD, Hopkin SP. 1996. Effect of pH on the toxicity of cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc to Folsomia candida Willem, 1902 (Collembola) in a standard laboratory test system. Chemosphere 33:2475-2486.
16. Crommentuijn T, Doornekamp A, van Gestel CAM. 1997. Bioavailability and ecological effects of cadmium on Folsomia candida (Willem) in an artificial soil substrate as influenced by pH and organic matter. Appl Soil Ecol 5:261-271.
17. International Standards Organization. 1999. Soil quality: Inhibition of reproduction of Collembola (Folsomia candida) by soil pollutants. ISO 11267. Geneva, Switzerland.
18. Dohrmann R. 2006. Cation exchange capacity methodology II: A modified silver-thiourea method. Appl Clay Sci 34:38-46.
19. Hobbelen PHF, Koolhaas JE, van Gestel CAM. 2004. Risk assessment of heavy metal pollution for detritivores in floodplain soils in the Biesbosch, the Netherlands, taking bioavailability into account. Environ Pollut 129:409-419.
20. Hamilton HA, Russo RC, Thurston RV. 1977. Trimmed Spearman-Karber method for estimating median lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays. Environ Sci Technol 11:714-719.
21. Haanstra L, Doelman P, Oude Voshaar JH. 1985. The use of sigmoidal dose response curves in soil ecotoxicological research. Plant Soil 84:293-297.
22. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. WH Freeman, San Francisco, CA, USA.
23. Miao A-J, Zhang X-Y, Luo Z, Chen C-S, Chin W-C, Schantschi PH, Quigg A. 2010. Zinc oxide-engineered nanoparticles: Dissolution and toxicity to marine phytoplankton. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:2814-2822.
24. Bian SW, Mudunkotuwa IA, Rupasinghe T, Grassian VH. 2011. Aggregation and dissolution of 4 nm ZnO nanoparticles in aqueous environments: Influence of pH, ionic strength, size, and adsorption of humic acid. Langmuir 27:6059-6068.
25. Yamabi S, Imai H. 2002. Growth conditions for wurtzite zinc oxide films in aqueous solutions. J Mater Chem 12:3773-3778.
26. Ma H, Williams PL, Diamond SA. 2013. Ecotoxicity of manufactured ZnO nanoparticles-A review. Environ Pollut 172:76-85.
27. Lead JR, Wilkinson KJ. 2006. Aquatic colloids and nanoparticles: Current knowledge and future trends. Environ Chem 3:159-171.
28. Fountain MT, Hopkin SP. 2005. Folsomia candida (Collembola): A "standard" soil arthropod. Annu Rev Entomol 50:201-222.
29. Greenslade P, Vaughan GT. 2003. A comparison of Collembola species for toxicity testing of Australian soils. Pedobiologia 47:171-179.
30. Van Straalen NM, Verhoef HA. 1997. The development of a bioindicator system for soil acidity based on arthropod pH preferences. J Appl Ecol 34:217-232.
31. Heggelund LR, Diez-Ortiz M, Lofts S, Lahive E, Jurkschat K, Cedergreen N, Spurgeon D, Svendsen C. 2013. Soil pH effects on the comparative toxicity of dissolved zinc, non-nano and nano ZnO to the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Nanotoxicology. doi:10.3109/17435390.2013.809808
32. Stone V, Nowack B, Baun A, van den Brink N, von der Kammer F, Dusinska M, Handy R, Hankin S, Hassellöv M, Joner E, Fernandes TF. 2010. Nanomaterials for environmental studies: Classification, reference material issues, and strategies for physico-chemical characterisation. Sci Total Environ 408:1745-1754.
33. Muyssen BTA, De Schamphelaere KAC, Janssen CR. 2006. Mechanisms of chronic waterborne Zn toxicity in Daphnia magna. Aquat Toxicol 77:393-401.
34. Thakali S, Allen HE, Di Toro DM, Ponizovsky AA, Rooney CP, Zhao FJ, McGrath SP. 2006. A terrestrial biotic ligand model. 1. Development and application to Cu and Ni toxicities to barley root elongation in soils. Environ Sci Technol 40:7085-7093.