Transcultural validity of the Hypomania Checklist-32 (HCL-32) in patients with major depressive episodes

Bipolar Disorders

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 701-712

  Gamma, Alex ^a   Angst, Jules ^a   Azorin, Jean Michel ^b   Bowden, Charles L ^c   Perugi, Giulio ^d   Vieta, Eduard ^e   Young, Allan H ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PSYCHIATRY   (Switzerland)

^b HÔPITAL SAINTE MARGUERITE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^f IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bipolar disorder; Confirmatory factor analysis; Culture; Hypomania; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIPOLAR DISORDER; CULTURAL FACTOR; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DSM-IV; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOMANIA CHECKLIST 32; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAJOR DEPRESSION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; VALIDATION STUDY;

BIPOLAR DISORDER; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; CULTURE; HYPOMANIA; SCREENING;

BIPOLAR DISORDER; CHECKLIST; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84883555691     PISSN: 13985647     EISSN: 13995618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12101     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Angst J, Gamma A, Benazzi F, Ajdacic V, Eich D, Rössler W. Toward a re-definition of subthreshold bipolarity: epidemiology and proposed criteria for bipolar-II, minor bipolar disorders and hypomania. J Affect Disord 2003; 73: 133-146.
2. Zimmermann P, Brückl T, Nocon A, et al. Heterogeneity of DSM-IV major depressive disorder as a consequence of subthreshold bipolarity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009; 66: 1341-1352.
3. Angst J, Cui L, Swendsen J, et al. Major depressive disorder with subthreshold bipolarity in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167: 1194-1201.
4. Angst J, Meyer TD, Adolfsson R, et al. Hypomania: a transcultural perspective. World Psychiatry 2010; 9: 41-49.
5. Angst J, Azorin JM, Bowden CL, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of undiagnosed bipolar disorders in patients with a major depressive episode: the BRIDGE Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68: 791-799.
6. Vieta E, Suppes T. Bipolar II disorder: arguments for and against a distinct diagnostic entity. Bipolar Disord 2008; 10: 163-178.
7. Nivoli AM, Colom F, Pacchiarotti I, et al. Treatment strategies according to clinical features in a naturalistic cohort study of bipolar patients: a principal component analysis of lifetime pharmacological and biophysic treatment options. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2013; 23: 263-275.
8. Hirschfeld RMA, Calabrese JR, Weissman MM, et al. Screening for bipolar disorder in the community. J Clin Psychiatry 2003; 64: 53-59.
9. Ghaemi SN, Miller CJ, Berv DA, Klugman J, Rosenquist KJ, Pies RW. Sensitivity and specificity of a new bipolar spectrum diagnostic scale. J Affect Disord 2005; 84: 273-277.
10. Vázquez GH, Romero E, Fabregues F, Pies R, Ghaemi N, Mota-Castillo M. Screening for bipolar disorders in Spanish-speaking populations: sensitivity and specificity of the Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale-Spanish Version. Compr Psychiatry 2010; 51: 552-556.
11. Wang HR, Kim S, Kang SH, Joo YH, Kim CY. The validation study of the Korean version of the Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2008; 47: 533-539.
12. Angst J, Adolfsson R, Benazzi F, et al. The HCL-32: towards a self-assessment tool for hypomanic symptoms in outpatients. J Affect Disord 2005; 88: 217-233.
13. Lecrubier Y, Sheehan DV, Weiller E, et al. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychiatry 1997; 12: 224-231.
14. Stevens JP. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992.
15. Horn JL. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1965; 30: 179-185.
16. Jöreskog K. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 1969; 34: 183-202.
17. Sörbom D. Model modification. Psychometrika 1989; 54: 371-384.
18. Jöreskog KG, Goldberger AS. Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. J Am Stat Assoc 1975; 70: 631-639.
19. Muthén BO. Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika 1989; 54: 557-585.
20. McDonald RP. Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1999.
21. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990; 107: 238-246.
22. Tucker NR, Lewis C. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 1973; 38: 1-10.
23. Steiger JH, Lind JC. Statistically Based Tests for the Number of Common Factors. Iowa City, IA: Annual Meeting of the Psyschometric Society, 1980.
24. Brown TA. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2006.
25. Brannick MT. Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling. J Organ Behav 1995; 16: 201-213.
26. Kelloway EK. Structural equation modelling in perspective. J Organ Behav 1995; 16: 215-224.
27. Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit Indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model 2007; 14: 464-504.
28. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model 2002; 9: 233-255.
29. Little TD. Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: practical and theoretical issues. Multivar Behav Res 1997; 32: 53-76.
30. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User's Guide, 5th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén, 1998-2011.
31. McDonald RP. Generalizability in factorable domains: "domain validity and generalizability": 1. Educ Psychol Measur 1978; 38: 75-79.
32. Zinbarg RE, Revelle W, Yovel I, Li W. Cronbach's α, Revelle's β, and Mcdonald's ωH: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika 2005; 70: 123-133.
33. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297-334.
34. Revelle W. Hierarchical cluster-analysis and the internal structure of tests. Multivar Behav Res 1979; 14: 57-74.
35. Novick MR, Lewis C. Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika 1967; 32: 1-13.
36. Revelle W, Zinbarg RE. Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: comments on sijtsma. Psychometrika 2009; 74: 145-154.
37. Royston P, White IR. Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE): implementation in Stata. J Stat Softw 2011; 45: 1-20.
38. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2007.
39. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, 2011. Available from: http://www.R-project.org.
40. SAS software. Version 8.2 of the SAS System for Windows. Copyright © 2001 SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA.
41. Moreno C, Laje G, Blanco C, Jiang H, Schmidt AB, Olfson M. National trends in the outpatient diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorder in youth. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007; 64: 1032-1039.
42. Moreno C, Hasin DS, Arango C, et al. Depression in bipolar disorder versus major depressive disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Bipolar Disord 2012; 14: 271-282.