Geometry-Driven Cell Organization Determines Tissue Growths in Scaffold Pores: Consequences for Fibronectin Organization

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2013, Pages

  Joly, Pascal ^a   Duda, Georg N ^a   Schöne, Martin ^a   Welzel, Petra B ^b,c   Freudenberg, Uwe ^b,c   Werner, Carsten ^b,c   Petersen, Ansgar ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF POLYMER RESEARCH DRESDEN   (Germany)

^c CENTER FOR REGENERATIVE THERAPIES DRESDEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; FIBRONECTIN; HEPARIN; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ARTICLE; CELL COUNT; CELL ORGANIZATION; CELLULAR, SUBCELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FIBROBLAST; GEOMETRICAL MODEL; HEALING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; POROSITY; TISSUE GROWTH; TISSUE INJURY; TISSUE REGENERATION;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; CRYOGELS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FIBROBLASTS; FIBRONECTINS; HUMANS; POROSITY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84883496381     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073545     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Navarro M, Michiardi A, Castano O, Planell JA, (2008) Biomaterials in orthopaedics. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 5: 1137-1158.
2. Hench LL, Polak JM, (2002) Third-generation biomedical materials. Science 295: 1014-1017.
3. Midwood KS, Williams LV, Schwarzbauer JE, (2004) Tissue repair and the dynamics of the extracellular matrix. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 36: 1031-1037.
4. Kollmannsberger P, Bidan CM, Dunlop JWC, Fratzl P, (2011) The physics of tissue patterning and extracellular matrix organisation: how cells join forces. Soft Matter 7: 9549-9560.
5. Beningo KA, Dembo M, Wang YI, (2004) Responses of fibroblasts to anchorage of dorsal extracellular matrix receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 18024-18029.
6. Schindler M, Nur-E-Kamal A, Ahmed I, Kamal J, Liu HY, et al. (2006) Living in three dimensions- 3D nanostructured environments for cell culture and regenerative medicine. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics 45: 215-227.
7. Hakkinen KM, Harunaga JS, Doyle AD, Yamada KM, (2011) Direct Comparisons of the Morphology, Migration, Cell Adhesions, and Actin Cytoskeleton of Fibroblasts in Four Different Three-Dimensional Extracellular Matrices. Tissue Engineering Part A 17: 713-724.
8. Vidal G, Delord B, Neri W, Gounel S, Roubeau O, et al. (2011) The effect of surface energy, adsorbed RGD peptides and fibronectin on the attachment and spreading of cells on multiwalled carbon nanotube papers. Carbon 49: 2318-2333.
9. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE, (2006) Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126: 677-689.
10. Salem AK, Stevens R, Pearson RG, Davies MC, Tendler SJB, et al. (2002) Interactions of 3T3 fibroblasts and endothelial cells with defined pore features. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 61: 212-217.
11. Bidan CM, Kommareddy KP, Rumpler M, Kollmannsberger P, Brechet YJM, et al. (2012) How Linear Tension Converts to Curvature: Geometric Control of Bone Tissue Growth. Plos One 7.
12. Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE, (1997) Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 276: 1425-1428.
13. Vogel V, Sheetz M, (2006) Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 7: 265-275.
14. Edwards SL, Church JS, Alexander DLJ, Russell SJ, Ingham E, et al. (2011) Modeling Tissue Growth Within Nonwoven Scaffolds Pores. Tissue Engineering Part C-Methods 17: 123-130.
15. Shimizu M, Minakuchi K, Moon M, Koga J, (1997) Difference in interaction of fibronectin with type I collagen and type IV collagen. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology 1339: 53-61.
16. Velling T, Risteli J, Wennerberg K, Mosher DF, Johansson S, (2002) Polymerization of type I and III collagens is dependent on fibronectin and enhanced by integrins alpha(11)beta(1) and alpha(2)beta(1). Journal of Biological Chemistry 277: 37377-37381.
17. Sottile J, Shi F, Rublyevska I, Chiang H-Y, Lust J, et al. (2007) Fibronectin-dependent collagen I deposition modulates the cell response to fibronectin. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 293: C1934-C1946.
18. Shi F, Harman J, Fujiwara K, Sottile J, (2010) Collagen I matrix turnover is regulated by fibronectin polymerization. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 298: C1265-C1275.
19. Welzel PB, Grimmer M, Renneberg C, Naujox L, Zschoche S, et al. (2012) Macroporous StarPEG-Heparin Cryogels. Biomacromolecules 13: 2349-2358.
20. Freudenberg U, Hermann A, Welzel PB, Stirl K, Schwarz SC, et al. (2009) A star-PEG-heparin hydrogel platform to aid cell replacement therapies for neurodegenerative diseases. Biomaterials 30: 5049-5060.
21. Welzel PB, Prokoph S, Zieris A, Grimmer M, Zschoche S, et al. (2011) Modulating Biofunctional starPEG Heparin Hydrogels by Varying Size and Ratio of the Constituents. Polymers 3: 602-620.
22. Freudenberg U, Sommer J-U, Levental KR, Welzel PB, Zieris A, et al. (2012) Using Mean Field Theory to Guide Biofunctional Materials Design. Advanced Functional Materials 22: 1391-1398.
23. Lozinsky VI, (2002) Cryogels on the basis of natural and synthetic polymers: Preparation, properties and application. Uspekhi Khimii 71: 559-585.
24. Zhou LL, Higginbotham EJ, Yue B, (1998) Effects of ascorbic acid on levels of fibronectin, laminin and collagen type 1 in bovine trabecular meshwork in organ culture. Current Eye Research 17: 211-217.
25. Hata RI, Senoo H, (1989) L-ASCORBIC-ACID 2-PHOSPHATE STIMULATES COLLAGEN ACCUMULATION, CELL-PROLIFERATION, AND FORMATION OF A 3-DIMENSIONAL TISSUE-LIKE SUBSTANCE BY SKIN FIBROBLASTS. Journal of Cellular Physiology 138: 8-16.
26. Manders EMM, Stap J, Brakenhoff GJ, Vandriel R, Aten JA, (1992) DYNAMICS OF 3-DIMENSIONAL REPLICATION PATTERNS DURING THE S-PHASE, ANALYZED BY DOUBLE LABELING OF DNA AND CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY. Journal of Cell Science 103: 857-862.
27. Barlow AL, MacLeod A, Noppen S, Sanderson J, Guerin CJ, (2010) Colocalization Analysis in Fluorescence Micrographs: Verification of a More Accurate Calculation of Pearson's Correlation Coefficient. Microscopy and Microanalysis 16: 710-724.
28. Mao Y, Schwarzbauer JE, (2005) Fibronectin fibrillogenesis, a cell-mediated matrix assembly process. Matrix Biology 24: 389-399.
29. Ramtani S, (2004) Mechanical modelling of cell/ECM and cell/cell interactions during the contraction of a fibroblast-populated collagen microsphere: theory and model simulation. Journal of Biomechanics 37: 1709-1718.
30. Cheng G, Markenscoff P, Zygourakis K, (2009) A 3D Hybrid Model for Tissue Growth: The Interplay between Cell Population and Mass Transport Dynamics. Biophysical Journal 97: 401-414.
31. Stolarska MA, Kim Y, Othmer HG, (2009) Multi-scale models of cell and tissue dynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 367: 3525-3553.
32. O'Dea RD, Osborne JM, El Haj AJ, Byrne HM, Waters SL (2012) The interplay between tissue growth and scaffold degradation in engineered tissue constructs. J Math Biol.
33. Dunn GA, Heath JP, (1976) NEW HYPOTHESIS OF CONTACT GUIDANCE IN TISSUE-CELLS. Experimental Cell Research 101: 1-14.
34. Nelson CM, Jean RP, Tan JL, Liu WF, Sniadecki NJ, et al. (2005) Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 11594-11599.
35. Petersen A, Joly P, Bergmann C, Korus G, Duda GN, (2012) The Impact of Substrate Stiffness and Mechanical Loading on Fibroblast-Induced Scaffold Remodeling. Tissue Engineering Part A 18: 1804-1817.
36. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL, (2005) Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310: 1139-1143.
37. Fujie T, Ricotti L, Desii A, Menciassi A, Dario P, et al. (2011) Evaluation of Substrata Effect on Cell Adhesion Properties Using Freestanding Poly(L-lactic acid) Nanosheets. Langmuir 27: 13173-13182.
38. Reinke JM, Sorg H, (2012) Wound Repair and Regeneration. European Surgical Research 49: 35-43.
39. Carlson MA, Longaker MT, (2004) The fibroblast-populated collagen matrix as a model of wound healing: a review of the evidence. Wound Repair and Regeneration 12: 134-147.
40. Bidan CM, Kommareddy KP, Rumpler M, Kollmannsberger P, Fratzl P, et al. (2013) Geometry as a Factor for Tissue Growth: Towards Shape Optimization of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. Advanced Healthcare Materials 2: 186-194.
41. Chiu Y-C, Cheng M-H, Engel H, Kao S-W, Larson JC, et al. (2011) The role of pore size on vascularization and tissue remodeling in PEG hydrogels. Biomaterials 32: 6045-6051.
42. Hollister SJ, (2005) Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 4: 518-524.
43. Bai F, Zhang J, Wang Z, Lu J, Chang J, et al. (2011) The effect of pore size on tissue ingrowth and neovascularization in porous bioceramics of controlled architecture in vivo. Biomedical Materials 6.
44. Jeon YK, Jang YH, Yoo DR, Kim SN, Lee SK, et al. (2010) Mesenchymal stem cells' interaction with skin: Wound-healing effect on fibroblast cells and skin tissue. Wound Repair and Regeneration 18: 655-661.
45. Rumpler M, Woesz A, Dunlop JWC, van Dongen JT, Fratzl P, (2008) The effect of geometry on three-dimensional tissue growth. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 5: 1173-1180.
46. Knychala J, Bouropoulos N, Catt CJ, Katsamenis OL, Please CP, et al. (2013) Pore Geometry Regulates Early Stage Human Bone Marrow Cell Tissue Formation and Organisation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 41: 917-930.