Unraveling Effects of Novelty on Creativity

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 280-285

  Gillebaart, Marleen ^a   Förster, Jens ^a   Rotteveel, Mark ^a   Jehle, Astrid C M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883472381     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2013.813781     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357 - 376. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
2. Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuro-psychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529 - 550. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.529.
3. Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779 - 806. doi: 10.1037/a0012815.
4. Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2011). When prevention promotes creativity: The role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 794 - 809. doi: 10.1037/a0022981.
5. Clark, C. M., Veldman, D. J., & Thorpe, J. S. (1965). Convergent and divergent thinking abilities of talented adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 157 - 163. doi: 10.1037/h0022110
6. De Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation in the mood-creativity link: Towards a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739 - 756. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739.
7. Eisenberger, R., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Incremental effects of reward on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 728 - 741. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.728.
8. Epstein, R. (1990). Generativity theory and creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 116 - 140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Flach, F. (1990). Disorders of the pathways involved in the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 158 - 165. doi: 10.1080/10400419009534349.
10. Förster, J., Friedman, R., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 177 - 189. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.177.
11. Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Shapira, O. (2009). Preparing for novel versus familiar events: Shifts in global and local processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 383 - 399. doi: 10.1037/a0015748
12. Förster, J., Marguc, J., & Gillebaart, M. (2010). Novelty categorization theory. Social Psychology and Personality Compass, 4, 736 - 755. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00289.x
13. Friedman, R. S., Fishbach, A., Förster, J., & Werth, L. (2003). Attentional priming effects on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 277 - 286. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ152&3_18
14. Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2000). The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 477 - 492. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.477.
15. Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001 - 1013. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001.
16. Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2002). The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 41 - 55. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2001.1488.
17. Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2010). Implicit affective cues and attentional tuning: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 875 - 893. doi: 10.1037/a0020495
18. Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267 - 293. doi: 10.1037/h0040755
19. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
20. Harrington, D. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to "be creative" on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434 - 454. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00715.x
21. Kray, L. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Wong, E. M. (2006). Thinking inside the box: The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 33 - 48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.33
22. Manske, M. R., & Davis, G. A. (1968). Effects of simple instructional basis upon performance in the unusual uses test. Journal of General Psychology, 79, 25 - 33.
23. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220 - 232. doi: 10.1037/h0048850
24. Mumford, M. D. (2001). Something old, something new: Revisiting Guilford's conception of creative problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 267 - 276.
25. Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91 - 122. doi: 10.1080/10400419109534380
26. Murray, N., Sujan, H., Hirt, E. R., & Sujan, M. (1990). The influence of mood on categorization: A cognitive flexibility interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 411 - 425. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.411
27. Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual-pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 34 - 77.
28. Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1996). Computing contrasts, effect sized, and counternulls on other people's published data: General procedures for research consumers. Psychological Methods, 1, 331 - 340.
30. Runco, M. A. (1986). Flexibility and originality in children's divergent thinking. Journal of Psychology, 120, 345-352. doi: 10.1080/0023980.1986.9712632.
31. Runco, M. A. (1994). Creativity and its discontents. In M. P. Shaw & M. A. Runco (Eds.), Creativity and affect (pp. 102 - 223). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32. Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual review of Psychology, 55, 657 - 687. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502
33. Shalley, C. E. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 179 - 185. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.179
34. Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Schumacher, J. S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition, 21, 837 - 845.
35. Speller, K. G., & Schumacher, G. M. (1975). Age and set in creative test performance. Psychological Reports, 36, 447 - 450. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1975.36.2.447
36. Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845 - 851. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
37. Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creativity. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
38. Torrance, E. P. (1971). Are the Torrance tests of creative thinking biased against or in favor of "disadvantaged" groups? Gifted Child Quarterly, 15, 75 - 80. doi: 10.1177/001698627101500201
39. Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
40. Ward, W. (1975). Convergent and divergent measurement of creativity in children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 87 - 95. doi: 10.1177/001316447503500110