Acquisition of responding with a remifentanil-associated conditioned reinforcer in the rat

Psychopharmacology

Volumn 229, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 235-243

  Bertz, Jeremiah W ^a   Woods, James H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Conditioned reinforcement; Cues; Opioid; Pavlovian conditioning; Response acquisition

Indexed keywords

REMIFENTANIL;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG POTENCY; DRUG RESPONSE; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ANALGESICS, OPIOID; ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; MALE; PIPERIDINES; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84883457664     PISSN: 00333158     EISSN: 14322072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-013-3102-0     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Beninger RJ, Ranaldi R (1994) Dopaminergic agents with different mechanisms of action differentially affect responding for conditioned reward. In: Palomo T, Archer T (eds) Strategies for studying brain disorders, vol 1, depressive, anxiety and drug abuse disorders. Farrand, London, pp 411-428
2. Beninger RJ, Rolfe NG (1995) Dopamine D1-like receptor agonists impair responding for conditioned reward in rats. Behav Pharmacol 6:785-793. doi: 10.1097/00008877-199512000-00003
3. Burke KA, Franz TM, Miller DN, Schoenbaum G (2007) Conditioned reinforcement can be mediated by either outcome-specific or general affective representations. Front Integr Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.07/002.2007
4. Conklin CA, Tiffany ST (2002) Applying extinction research and theory to cue-exposure addiction treatments. Addiction 97:155-167. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.0055a.x
5. Cooper ZD, Truong YN-T, Shi Y-G, Woods JH (2008) Morphine deprivation increases self-administration of the fast- and short-acting μ-opioid receptor agonist remifentanil in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 326:920-929. doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.139196
6. Crespo JA, Sturm K, Saria A, Zernig G (2005) Simultaneous intra-accumbens remifentanil and dopamine kinetics suggest that neither determines within-session operant responding. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 183:201-209. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0180-7
7. Cunningham CL (1993) Pavlovian drug conditioning. In: van Haaren F (ed) Methods in behavioral pharmacology. Elsevier, New York, pp 349-381
8. Davis WM, Smith SG (1987) Conditioned reinforcement as a measure of the rewarding properties of drugs. In: Bozarth MA (ed) Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. Springer, New York, pp 199-210
9. de Borchgrave R, Rawlins JNP, Dickinson A, Balleine BW (2002) Effects of cytotoxic nucleus accumbens lesions on instrumental conditioning in rats. Exp Brain Res 144:50-68. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1031-y
10. Di Ciano (2008) Facilitated acquisition but not persistence of responding for a cocaine-paired conditioned reinforcer following sensitization with cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:1426-1431. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301542
11. Di Ciano P, Everitt BJ (2004) Conditioned reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with self-administered cocaine, heroin, or sucrose: implications for the persistence of addictive behaviour. Neuropharmacology 47:202-213. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.06.005
12. Di Ciano P, Benham-Hermetz J, Fogg AP, Osborne GEC (2007) Role of the prelimbic cortex in the acquisition, re-acquisition or persistence of responding for a drug-paired conditioned reinforcer. Neuroscience 150:291-298. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.09.016
13. Di Ciano P, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (2008) Differential effects of nucleus accumbens core, shell, or dorsal striatal inactivations on the persistence, reacquisition, or reinstatement of responding for a drug-paired conditioned reinforcer. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:1413-1425. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301522
14. Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (2000) Second-order schedules of drug reinforcement in rats and monkeys: measurement of reinforcing efficacy and drug-seeking behaviour. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 153:17-30. doi: 10.1007/s002130000566
15. Goddard B, Leri F (2006) Reinstatement of conditioned reinforcing properties of cocaine-conditioned stimuli. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 83:540-546. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2006.03.015
16. Hogarth L, Duka T (2006) Human nicotine conditioning requires explicit contingency knowledge: is addictive behavior cognitively mediated? Psychopharmacology (Berl) 184:553-566. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0150-0
17. Hutcheson DM, Quarta D, Halbout B, Rigal A, Valerio E, Heidbreder C (2011) Orexin-1 receptor antagonist SB-334867 reduces the acquisition and expression of cocaine-conditioned reinforcement and the expression of amphetamine-conditioned reward. Behav Pharmacol 22:173-181. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328343d761
18. Hyde TS (1976) The effect of Pavlovian stimuli on the acquisition of a new response. Learn Motiv 7:223-239. doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(76)90030-8
19. Institute of Laboratory Animal Research CoLS, National Research Council (1996) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, 7th edn. National Academies, Washington, DC
20. Kelleher RT, Gollub LR (1962) A review of positive conditioned reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 5:543-597. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-s543
21. Kirkpatrick K, Church RM (2004) Temporal learning in random control procedures. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 30:213-228. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.30.3.213
22. Le Foll B, Goldberg SR (2005) Control of the reinforcing effects of nicotine by associated environmental stimuli in animals and humans. Trends Pharmacol Sci 26:287-293. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2005.04.005
23. Mackintosh NJ (1974) The psychology of animal learning. Academic, New York
24. Marcus R, Carnathan G, Meyer RE, Cochin J (1976) Morphine-based secondary reinforcement: effects of different doses of naloxone. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 48:247-250. doi: 10.1007/BF00496856
25. Miller RR, Matzel LD (1989) Contingency and relative associative strength. In: Klein SB, Mowrer RR (eds) Contemporary learning theories: Pavlovian conditioning and the status of traditional learning theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 61-84
26. Milton AL, Everitt BJ (2010) The psychological and neurochemical mechanisms of drug memory reconsolidation: implications for the treatment of addiction. Eur J Neurosci 31:2308-2319. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07249.x
27. Myers KM, Carlezon WA (2010) Extinction of drug- and withdrawal-paired cues in animal models: relevance to the treatment of addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35:285-302. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.01.011
28. Olausson P, Jentsch JD, Taylor JR (2004) Repeated nicotine exposure enhances responding with conditioned reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 173:98-104. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1702-9
29. Olive MF, Kalivas PW (2011) Conditioning of addiction. In: Johnson BA (ed) Addiction medicine. Springer, New York, pp 159-178. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0338-9-8
30. Palmatier MI, Liu X, Matteson GL, Donny EC, Caggiula AR, Sved AF (2007) Conditioned reinforcement in rats established with self-administered nicotine and enhanced by noncontingent nicotine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 195:235-243. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-0897-6
31. Palmatier MI, Coddington SB, Liu X, Donny EC, Caggiula AR, Sved AF (2008) The motivation to obtain nicotine-conditioned reinforcers depends on nicotine dose. Neuropharmacology 55:1425-1430. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.09.002
32. Panlilio LV, Thorndike EB, Schindler CW (2007) Blocking of conditioning to a cocaine-paired stimulus: testing the hypothesis that cocaine perpetually produces a signal of larger-than-expected reward. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 86:774-777. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2007.03.005
33. Papini MR, Bitterman ME (1990) The role of contingency in classical conditioning. Psychol Rev 97:396-403. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.396
34. Parkinson JA, Olmstead MC, Burns LH, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1999) Dissociation in effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core and shell on appetitive Pavlovian approach behavior and the potentiation of conditioned reinforcement and locomotor activity by D-amphetamine. J Neurosci 19:2401-2411
35. Parkinson JA, Roberts AC, Everitt BJ, Di Ciano P (2005) Acquisition of instrumental conditioned reinforcement is resistant to the devaluation of the unconditioned stimulus. Q J Exp Psychol B 58:19-30. doi: 0.1080/ 02724990444000023
36. Rescorla RA (1967) Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychol Rev 74:71-80. doi: 10.1037/h0024109
37. Samaha A-N, Minogianis E-A, Nachar W (2011) Cues paired with either rapid or slower self-administered cocaine injections acquire similar conditioned rewarding properties. PLoS One 6: e26481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026481
38. See RE (2005) Neural substrates of cocaine-cue associations that trigger relapse. Eur J Pharmacol 526:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.09.034
39. Snycerski S, Laraway S, Poling A (2005) Response acquisition with immediate and delayed conditioned reinforcement. Behav Processes 68:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.08.004
40. Sosa R, dos Santos CV, Flores C (2011) Training a new response using conditioned reinforcement. Behav Processes 87:231-236. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc. 2011.03.001
41. Taylor JR, Robbins TW (1984) Enhanced behavioural control by conditioned reinforcers following microinjections of d-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 84:405-412. doi: 10.1007/BF00555222
42. Taylor JR, Olausson P, Quinn JJ, Torregrossa MM (2009) Targeting extinction and reconsolidation mechanisms to combat the impact of drug cues on addiction. Neuropharmacology 56:186-195. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.027
43. Thompson T, Pickens R (1969) Drug self-administration and conditioning. In: Steinberg H (ed) Scientific basis of drug dependence. Churchill, London, pp 177-198
44. Williams BA (1994) Conditioned reinforcement: experimental and theoretical issues. Behav Anal 17:261-285
45. Xue YX, Luo YX, Wu P, Shi HS, Xue LF, Chen C, Zhu WL, Ding ZB, Bao YP, Shi J, Epstein DH, Shaham Y, Lu L (2012) A memory retrieval-extinction procedure to prevent drug craving and relapse. Science 336:241-245. doi: 10.1126/science.1215070