Entrepreneurship, structural change, and economic growth

Journal of Evolutionary Economics

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 735-766

  Noseleit, Florian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Entrepreneurship; New business formation; Regional development; Structural change

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883453866     PISSN: 09369937     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00191-012-0291-3     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Acs ZJ, Braunerhjelm P, Audretsch DB, Carlsson B (2009) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 32: 15-30.
2. Afuah AN (2000) How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strateg Manag J 21(3): 387-404.
3. Agarwal R, Gort M (1996) The evolution of markets and entry, exit and survival of firms. Rev Econ Stat 78: 489-498.
4. Agarwal R, Gort M (2002) Firm and product life cycles and firm survival. Am Econ Rev 92: 184-190.
5. Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60: 323-351.
6. Ahlgren P, Jarneving B, Rousseau R (2003) Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 54(6): 550-560.
7. Audretsch DB (1995) Innovation and industry evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge/Massachusetts.
8. Balasubramanian N, Lee J (2008) Firm age and innovation. Ind Corp Change 17: 1019-1047.
9. Baldwin JR, Gu W (2006) Competition, firm turnover and productivity growth. Economic analysis research paper series, 42.
10. Baumol WJ, Blackman SAB, Wolf EN (1989) Productivity and American leadership. MIT Press, Cambridge.
11. Beesley ME, Hamilton RT (1984) Small Firms' seedbed role and the concept of turbulence. J Ind Econ 33: 217-231.
12. Bell D (1973) The coming of post-industrial society. Basic Books, New York.
13. Bensman SJ (2004) Pearson's r and author cocitation analysis: A commentary on the controversy. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 55(10): 935-936.
14. Bernard AB, Redding SJ, Schott PK (2010) Multiple-product firms and product switching. Am Econ Rev 100: 70-97.
15. Bhidé AV (2000) The origin and evolution of new businesses. Oxford University Press.
16. Carree MA, Thurik AR (2003) The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In: Zoltan JA, Audretsch DB (eds) Handbook of entrepreneurship research. Kluwer, Boston, pp. 437-471.
17. Cassiman B, Ueda M (2006) Optimal project rejection and new firm start-ups. Manag Sci 52: 262-275.
18. Cooper AC, Dunkelberg WC (1987) Entrepreneurial research: old questions, new answers and methodological issues. Am J Small Bus 11: 11-23.
19. David PA (1994) Why are institutions the Carriers of history?: path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions. Struct Change Econ Dyn 5(2): 205-220.
20. David PA (2007) Path dependence, its critics and the quest for "historical economics." In: Hodgson GM (ed) The evolution of economic institutions: A critical reader. Edward Elgar Publishing.
21. Disney R, Hasekl J, Helden Y (2003) Restructuring and productivity growth in UK manufacturing. Econ J 113: 666-694.
22. Echevarria EC (1997) Changes in sectoral composition associated with economic growth. Int Econ Rev 38(2): 431-452.
23. Fagerberg JE (2003) Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: An appraisal of the literature. J Evol Econ 13(2): 125-159.
24. Faulstich W (2004) Gesellschaft und Kultur der siebziger Jahre: Einführung und Überblick. In: Faulstich W (ed) Die Kultur der 70er Jahre. W. Fink Verlag, Munich.
25. Foster L, Haltiwanger JC, Krizian CJ (2006) Market selection, reallocation, and restructuring in the US Retail Trade Sector in the 1990s. Rev Econ Stat 88: 748-758.
26. Fritsch M (2008) How does new business formation affect regional development? Introduction to the special issue. Small Bus Econ 30: 1-14.
27. Fritsch M, Falck O (2007) New business formation by industry over space and time: A multidimenstional analysis. Reg Stud 41(2): 157-172.
28. Fritsch M, Schröter A (2009) Are more start-ups really better? Quantity and quality of new businesses and their effect on regional development. Jena Economic Research Papers, 2009-070.
29. Gartner WB (1989) Some suggestions for research on entrepreneurial traits and characteristics. Entrep Theory Pract 14(1): 27-37.
30. Glaeser EL, Kallal HD, Scheinkman JA, Shleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J Polit Econ 100: 1126-1152.
31. Glaeser EL, Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2010) Urban economics and entrepreneurship. J Urban Econ 67: 1-14.
32. Grabher G (1993) The weakness of strong ties. In: Grabher G (ed) The embedded firm. Routledge.
33. Inglehart R (1977) The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton.
34. Inglehart R (1990) Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
35. Jarausch KH (2006) Krise oder Aufbruch? Historische Annäherungen an die 1970er-Jahre. Zeithist Forsch [Studies in Contemporary History] 3: 334-341.
36. Klepper SJ (1996) Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. Am Econ Rev 86: 532-583.
37. Klepper SJ (2002) The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of US automobile industry. Ind Corp Change 11: 645-666.
38. Klepper SJ (2007) Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the US automobile industry. Manag Sci 53: 616-631.
39. Koster S (2007) The entrepreneurial and replication function of new firm formation. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 98(5): 667-674.
40. Kuznets SS (1971) Economic growth of nations, total output and productivity structure. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
41. LaFountain C (2005) Where do firms locate? Testing competing models of agglomeration. J Urban Econ 58: 338-366.
42. Lyotard J-F (1993) The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge, 9th printing (first pub 1984). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
43. Malerba F, Orsenigo L (1993) Technological regimes and firm behaviour. Ind Corp Change 2: 45-71.
44. Malerba F, Orsenigo L (1997) Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Ind Corp Change 6: 83-117.
45. Metcalfe JS (2005) Evolutionary concepts in relation to evolutionary economics. In: Dopfer K (ed) The evolutionary foundations of economics. Cambridge University Press.
46. Neffke F, Henning M, Boschma R (2011) How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Econ Geogr 87(3): 237-265.
47. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
48. Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res Policy 13: 343-373.
49. Redding SJ, Sturm DM (2008) The costs of remoteness: Evidence from German division and reunification. Am Econ Rev 95: 1766-1797.
50. Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98: 71-102.
51. Scarpetta SP, Hemmings P, Tressel T, Woo J (2002) The role of policy and institutions for productivity and firm dynamics: Evidence from micro and industry data. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 329.
52. Sorenson O, Auida PG (2000) The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States 1940-1989. Am J Sociol 106: 224-262.
53. Südekum J (2008) Convergence of skill composition across German regions. Reg Sci Urban Econ 38: 148-159.
54. Teece D, Pisano G (1994) The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Ind Corp Change 3: 537-556.
55. Teece DJ, Rumelt R, Dosi G, Winter SG (1994) Understanding corporate coherence: theory and evidence. J Econ Behav Org 23: 1-30.
56. Temple J, Wößmann L (2006) Dualism and cross-country growth regressions. J Econ Growth 11: 187-228.
57. van Eck N, Waltman L (2008) Appropriate similarity measures for author cocitation analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 59: 1653-1661.
58. van Praag M, van Stel A (2011) The more business owners the merrier? Scales Research Reports, H201010.
59. White HD (2003) Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 54(13): 1250-1259.
60. Zagler M (2009) Economic growth, structural change, and search unemployment. J Econ 96: 63-78.