Adoption of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to electronic commerce: A statistical meta-analysis approach

18th International Conference on Software Engineering and Data Engineering 2009, SEDE 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 185-193

  Filimban, Ghassan ^a   Aljahdali, Sultan H ^b  

^a Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study   (United States)

^b TAIF UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE; IMPROVING SYSTEMS; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; PUBLICATION BIAS; STATISTICAL FINDING; SYSTEM LEVELS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; USER ATTITUDES;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84883438501     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. eTForecasts, Internet User Forecast by Country, 2003. Available: Http://www.etforecasts.com/products/ES-intusersv2.h tm#table2.7
2. The Census Bureau of the Department of Commerce, Quarterly Retail E-Commerce Sales 2nd Quarter 2005. Available: Http://www.census.gov/mrts/www/ data/html/05Q2.ht ml
3. Q. Ma and L. Liu, "The technology acceptance model: A Meta-Analysis of empirical findings," Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, Vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 59-72, 2004.
4. Y. Lee, K. Kozar, and K. Larsen, "The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future," Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 12, no. 50, pp. 752-780, 2003.
5. M. Mahmood and D. Swanberg, "Factors affecting information technology usage: A Meta-Analysis of the empirical literature," Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol., 11, no. 2, pp. 107-130, 2001.
6. P. Legris, J. Ingham, and P. Collerette, "Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model," Information & Management, Vol. 40, pp. 191-204, 2003.
7. M. Smith and G. Glass, "Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies," American Psychologist, Vol. 32, pp. 752-760, 1977.
8. T. Cook, H. Cooper, D. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. Hedges, R. Light, T. Louis, and F. Mosteller, Eds. Meta-Analysis for Explanation: a casebook. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. 1992.
9. R. Petersnn and S. Brown, "On the use of beta coefficients in Meta-Analysis," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 175-181, 2005.
10. S. Zola and L. Squire, "Relationship between Magnitude of Damage to the Hippocampus and Impaired Recognition Memory in Monkeys," HIPPOCAMPUS, Vol. 11, pp. 92-98, 2001.
11. R. Rosenthal, Meta-Analysis Procedures for Social Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 1991.
12. F. Wolf, Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1988.
13. R. Rosenthal, "File drawer problem and tolerance for null results," Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 86, pp. 638-641, 1979.
14. L. Hedges and I. Olkin, Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1985.
15. R. SoKal and F. Rohlf, Biometry. 3ed. San Francisco: Freeman, 1999.
16. G. Glass, B. McGaw, and M. Smith, Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1981.