Comparative analysis of genetic diversity in Canadian barley assessed by SSR, DarT, and pedigree data

Genome

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 351-358

  Lamara, Mebarek ^a   Zhang, Li Yi ^a   Marchand, Suzanne ^a   Tinker, Nicholas A ^b   Belzile, François ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b OTTAWA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Barley; DArT; Genetic distance; Kinship coefficient; Linkage disequilibrium (LD); SSR

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CANADA; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HORDEUM;

ALLELES; CANADA; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC VARIATION; HORDEUM; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS;

EID: 84883371763     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/gen-2013-0048     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Almanza-Pinzón M.I. Khairallah M. Fox P.N. Warburton M.L. 2003. Comparison of molecular markers and coefficients of parentage for the analysis of genetic diversity among spring bread wheat accessions. Euphytica, 130: 77-86. 10.1023/A:1022310014075.
2. Asins M.J. Carbonell E.A. 1989. Distribution of genetic variability in a durum wheat world collection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 77: 287-294. 10.1007/BF00266199.
3. Baum, B.R., Bailey, L.G., and Thompson, B.K. 1985. Barley register. Agriculture Canada Publ. 1783B, Ottawa, Canada.
4. Beattie A.D. Edney M.J. Scoles G.J. Rossnagel B.G. 2010. Association mapping of malting quality data from western Canadian two-row barley cooperative trials. Crop Sci. 50: 1649-1663. 10.2135/cropsci2009.06.0334.
5. Casas A.M. Igartua E. Valles M.P. Molina-Cano J.L. 1998. Genetic diversity of barley cultivars grown in Spain, estimated by RFLP, similarity and coancestry coefficients. Plant Breed. 117: 429-435. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1998. tb01968.x.
6. Close T.J. Bhat P.R. Lonardi S. Wu Y. Rostoks N. Ramsay L. et al 2009. Development and implementation of high-throughput SNP genotyping in barley. BMC Genomics, 10: 582. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-582. 19961604.
7. Cockram J. White J. Zuluaga D.L. Smith D. Comadran J. Macaulay M. et al 2010. Genome-wide association mapping to candidate polymorphism resolution in the unsequenced barley genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 50: 21611-21616. 10.1073/pnas.1010179107.
8. Comadran J. Thomas W.T.B. van Eeuwijk F.A. Ceccarelli S. Grando S. Stanca A.M. et al 2009. Patterns of genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium in a highly structured Hordeum vulgare association-mapping population for the Mediterranean basin. Theor. Appl. Genet. 119: 175-187. 10.1007/s00122-009-1027- 0. 19415228.
9. 2 heterosis in winter wheat crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 79: 241-250. 10.1007/BF00225958.
10. Dávila J.A. Sánchez de la Hoz M.P. Loarce Y. Ferrer E. 1998. The use of random amplified microsatellite polymorphic DNA and coefficients of parentage to determine genetic relationships in barley. Genome, 41 (4): 477-486. 10.1139/g98-044.
11. de Vienne D.M. Giraud T. Martin O.C. 2007. A congruence index for testing topological similarity between trees. Bioinformatics, 23: 3119-3124. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm500. 17933852.
12. Dice L.R. 1945. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology, 26: 297-302. 10.2307/1932409.
13. Ellis R.P. McNicol J.W. Baird E. Booth A. Lawrence P. Thomas B. et al 1997. The use of AFLPs to examine genetic relatedness in barley. Mol. Breed. 3: 359-369. 10.1023/A:1009602321815.
14. Elshire R.J. Glaubitz J.C. Sun Q. Poland J.A. Kawamoto K. Buckler E.S. et al 2011. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE, 6 (5): e19379. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019379. 21573248.
15. FAOSTATdata. 2008. Available online from http://faostat.fao.org/site/291/ default.aspx [accessed 2013].
16. Graner A. Ludwig W.F. Melchinger A.E. 1994. Relationships among European barley germplasm: II. Comparison of RFLP and pedigree data. Crop Sci. 34: 1199-1205. 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400050010x.
17. Hayes P. Szücs P. 2006. Disequilibrium and association in barley: thinking outside the glass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103: 18385-18386. 10.1073/pnas.0609405103. 17130443.
18. Hill W.G. Weir B.S. 1988. Variances and covariances of squared linkage disequilibria in finite populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 33: 54-78. 10.1016/0040-5809(88)90004-4. 3376052.
19. Kong D. Choo T.M. Jui P. Ferguson T. Therrien M.C. Ho K.M. et al 1994. Genetic variation and adaptation of 76 Canadian barley cultivars. Can. J. Plant Sci. 74 (4): 737-744. 10.4141/cjps94-132.
20. Kong D. Choo T.M. Jui P. Ferguson T. Therrien M.C. Ho K.M. et al 1995. Variation in starch, protein, and fibre of Canadian barley cultivars. Can. J. Plant Sci. 75 (4): 865-870. 10.4141/cjps95-143.
21. Manninen O. Nissila E. 1997. Genetic diversity among Finnish six-rowed barley cultivars based on pedigree information and DNA markers. Hereditas, 126: 87-93.
22. Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27: 209-220. 6018555.
23. Martin J.M. Blake T.K. Hockett E.A. 1991. Diversity among North American spring barley cultivars based on coefficients of parentage. Crop Sci. 31: 1131-1137. 10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100050009x.
24. Massman J. Cooper B. Horsley R. Neate S. Dill-Macky R. Chao S. et al 2011. Genome-wide association mapping of Fusarium head blight resistance in contemporary barley breeding germplasm. Mol. Breed. 27: 439-454. 10.1007/s11032-010-9442-0.
25. Matus I.A. Hayes P.M. 2002. Genetic diversity in three groups of barley germplasm assessed by simple sequence repeats. Genome, 45 (6): 1095-1106. 10.1139/g02-071. 12502254.
26. Mikel M.A. Kolb F.L. 2008. Genetic diversity of contemporary North American barley. Crop Sci. 48: 1399-1407. 10.2135/cropsci2008.01.0029.
27. Morgante M. Rafalski A. Biddle P. Tingey S. Olivieri A.M. 1994. Genetic mapping and variability of seven soybean simple sequence repeat loci. Genome, 37 (5): 763-769. 10.1139/g94-109. 8001811.
28. Morrell P.L. Clegg M.T. 2007. Genetic evidence for a second domestication of barley (Hordeum vulgare) east of the Fertile Crescent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104: 3289-3294. 10.1073/pnas.0611377104. 17360640.
29. Narasimhalu P. Kong D. Choo T.M. 1998. Straw yields and nutrients of seventy-five Canadian barley cultivars. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 78 (1): 127-134. 10.4141/A97-020.
30. Nei M. Li W.H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76: 5269-5273. 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269. 291943.
31. Nordborg M. Weigel D. 2008. Next-generation genetics in plants. Nature, 456: 720-723. 10.1038/nature07629. 19079047.
32. Pasam R.K. Sharma R. Malosetti M. van Eeuwijk F.A. Haseneyer G. Kilian B. et al 2012. Genome-wide association studies for agronomical traits in a world wide spring barley collection. BMC Plant Biol. 12: 16. 10.1186/1471-2229-12-16. 22284310.
33. Pejic I. Ajmone-Marsan P. Morgante M. Kozumplick V. Castiglioni P. Taramino G. et al 1998. Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs and AFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97: 1248-1255. 10.1007/s001220051017.
34. Poland J.A. Brown P.J. Sorrells M.E. Jannink J.-L. 2012. Development of high-density genetic maps for barley and wheat using a novel two-enzyme genotyping-by-sequencing approach. PLoS One, 7 (2): e32253. 10.1371/journal. pone.0032253. 22389690.
35. Pritchard J.K. Przeworski M. 2001. Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69: 1-14. 10.1086/321275. 11410837.
36. Remington D.L. Thornsberry J.M. Matsuoka Y. Wilson L.M. Whitt S.R. Doebley J. et al 2001. Structure of linkage disequilibrium and phenotypic associations in the maize genome. Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. U.S.A. 98: 11479-11484. 10.1073/pnas.201394398.
37. Rohlf, F.J. 2000. NTSYS-PC: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.1. Exeter Software Publisher, Setauket, New York.
38. Rostoks N. Mudie S. Cardle L. Russell J. Ramsay L. Booth A. et al 2005. Genome-wide SNP discovery and linkage analysis in barley based on genes responsive to abiotic stress. Mol. Genet. Genomics, 274: 515-527. 10.1007/s00438-005-0046-z.
39. Rostoks N. Ramsay L. MacKenzie K. Cardle L. Bhat P.R. et al 2006. Recent history of artificial outcrossing facilitates whole-genome association mapping in elite inbred crop varieties. Proc. Natl. Acad. U.S.A. 103: 18656-18661. 10.1073/pnas.0606133103.
40. Russell J. Booth A. Fuller J. Harrower B. Hedley P. Machray G. et al 2004. A comparison of sequence-based polymorphism and haplotype content in transcribed and anonymous regions of the barley genome. Genome, 47 (2): 389-398. 10.1139/g03-125. 15060592.
41. Schut J.W. Qi X. Stam P. 1997. Association between relationship measures based on AFLP markers, pedigree data and morphological traits in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 1161-1168. 10.1007/s001220050677.
42. Smith J.S.C. Kresovich S. Hopkins M.S. Mitchell S.E. Dean R.E. Woodman W.L. et al 2000. Genetic diversity among elite sorghum inbred lines assessed with simple sequence repeats. Crop Sci. 40: 226-232. 10.2135/cropsci2000. 401226x.
43. Sneath, P.H.A., and Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.
44. Soleimani V.D. Baum B.R. Johnson D.A. 2002. AFLP and pedigree-based genetic diversity estimates in modern cultivars of durum wheat [ Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum (Desf.) Husn.]. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 350-357. 10.1007/s001220100714. 12582707.
45. Soleimani V.D. Baum B.R. Johnson D.A. 2007. Analysis of genetic diversity in barley cultivars reveals incongruence between S-SAP, SNP and pedigree data. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 54: 83-97. 10.1007/s10722-005-1886-4.
46. Souza E. Sorrells M.E. 1989. Pedigree analysis of North American oat cultivars released from 1951 to 1985. Crop Sci. 29: 595-601. 10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900030008x.
47. Thornsberry J.M. Goodman M.M. Doebley J. Kresovich S. Nielsen D. Buckler E.S. IV. 2001. Dwarf8 polymorphisms associate with variation in flowering time. Nat. Genet. 28: 286-289. 10.1038/90135. 11431702.
48. Tinker N.A. Mather D.E. 1993. KIN: software for computing kinship coefficients. J. Hered. 84: 238.
49. Tinker N.A. Fortin M.G. Mather D.E. 1993. Random amplified polymorphic DNA and pedigree relationships in spring barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85: 976-984. 10.1007/BF00215037.
50. Varshney R.K. Thiel T. Sretenovic-Rajicic T. Baum M. Valkoun J. Guo P. et al 2008. Identification and validation of a score set of informative genic SSR and SNP markers for assaying functional diversity in barley. Mol. Breed. 22: 1-13. 10.1007/s11032-007-9151-5.
51. Wenzl P. Carling J. Kudrna D. Jaccoud D. Huttner E. Kleinhofs A. et al 2004. Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) for whole-genome profiling of barley. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101: 9915-9920. 10.1073/pnas.0401076101. 15192146.
52. Xia L. Peng K. Yang S. Wenzl P. Carmen de Vicente M. Fregene M. et al 2005. DArT for high-throughput genotyping of cassava (Manihot esculenta) and its wild relatives. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110: 1092-1098. 10.1007/s00122-005-1937-4. 15742202.
53. Zhang L.Y. Marchand S. Tinker N.A. Belzile F. 2009. Population structure and linkage disequilibrium in barley assessed by DArT markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 119: 43-52. 10.1007/s00122-009-1015-4. 19343317.
54. Zhou H. Muehlbauer G. Steffenson B. 2012. Population structure and linkage disequilibrium in elite barley breeding germplasm from the United States. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B, 13 (6): 438-451. 10.1631/jzus.B1200003.