Modelling sequential text with an adaptive topic model

EMNLP-CoNLL 2012 - 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 535-545

  Du, Lan ^a   Buntine, Wray ^b   Jin, Huidong ^b  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GIBBS SAMPLERS; LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; SEMANTIC TECHNIQUES; SEQUENTIAL STRUCTURE; TEXT ANALYSIS; TOPIC ADAPTATION; TOPIC MODEL; TOPIC MODELING;

SEMANTICS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84883323597     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. R. Arora and B. Ravindran. 2008. Latent Dirichlet allocation and singular value decomposition based multi-document summarization. In ICDM '08: Proc. of 2008 Eighth IEEE Inter. Conf. on Data Mining, pages 713-718.
2. R. Barzilay and L. Lee. 2004. Catching the drift: Probabilistic content models, with applications to generation and summarization. In HLT-NAACL 2004: Main Proceedings, pages 113-120. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. D.M. Blei and J.D. Lafferty. 2006. Dynamic topic models. In ICML '06: Proc. of 23rd international conference on Machine learning, pages 113-120.
4. D.M. Blei and P.J. Moreno. 2001. Topic segmentation with an aspect hidden Markov model. In Proc. of 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 343-348.
5. D.M. Blei, A.Y. Ng, and M.I. Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:993-1022.
6. W. Buntine and M. Hutter. 2012. A Bayesian view of the Poisson-Dirichlet process. Technical Report arXiv:1007.0296v2, ArXiv, Cornell, February.
7. H. Chen, S.R.K. Branavan, R. Barzilay, and D.R. Karger. 2009. Global models of document structure using latent permutations. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conf. of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 371-379, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. C. Chen, L. Du, and W. Buntine. 2011. Sampling for the Poisson-Dirichlet process. In European Conf. on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Database, pages 296-311.
9. S.C. Deerwester, S.T. Dumais, T.K. Landauer, G.W. Fur-nas, and R.A. Harshman. 1990. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 41(6):391-407.
10. L. Du, W. Buntine, and H. Jin. 2010. A segmented topic model based on the two-parameter Poisson-Dirichlet process. Machine Learning, 81:5-19.
11. L. Du, W. Buntine, H. Jin, and C. Chen. 2012. Sequential latent dirichlet allocation. Knowledge and Information Systems, 31(3):475-503.
12. J. Eisenstein and R. Barzilay. 2008. Bayesian unsuper-vised topic segmentation. In Proc. of Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 334-343. Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. T.L. Griffiths, M. Steyvers, D.M. Blei, and J.B. Tenenbaum. 2005. Integrating topics and syntax. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17, pages 537-544.
14. A. Gruber, Y. Weiss, and M. Rosen-Zvi. 2007. Hidden topic markov models. Journal of Machine Learning Research - Proceedings Track, 2:163-170.
15. E.A. Hardisty, J. Boyd-Graber, and P. Resnik. 2010. Modeling perspective using adaptor grammars. In Proc. of the 2010 Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 284-292, Strouds-burg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. M. Johnson. 2010. PCFGs, topic models, adaptor grammars and learning topical collocations and the structure of proper names. In Proc. of 48th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 1148-1157, Uppsala, Sweden, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. H. Misra, F. Yvon, O. Capp, and J. Jose. 2011. Text segmentation: A topic modeling perspective. Information Processing & Management, 47(4):528-544.
18. D. Newman, J.H. Lau, K. Grieser, and T. Baldwin. 2010. Automatic evaluation of topic coherence. In North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Human Language Technologies, pages 100-108.
19. D. Newman, E.V. Bonilla, and W. Buntine. 2011. Improving topic coherence with regularized topic models. In J. Shawe-Taylor, R.S. Zemel, P. Bartlett, F.C.N. Pereira, and K.Q. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24, pages 496-504.
20. C.P. Robert and G. Casella. 2004. Monte Carlo statistical methods. Springer. second edition.
21. M. Rosen-Zvi, T. Griffiths, M. Steyvers, and P. Smyth. 2004. The author-topic model for authors and documents. In Proc. of 20th conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 487-494.
22. Y. W. Teh, M. I. Jordan, M. J. Beal, and D. M. Blei. 2006. Hierarchical Dirichlet processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101:1566-1581.
23. Y. W. Teh. 2006. A hierarchical Bayesian language model based on Pitman-Yor processes. In Proc. of 21st Inter. Conf. on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 985-992.
24. H. Wallach, D. Mimno, and A. McCallum. 2009. Rethinking LDA: Why priors matter. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19.
25. H. Wang, D. Zhang, and C. Zhai. 2011. Structural topic model for latent topical structure analysis. In Proc. of 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Volume 1, pages 1526-1535, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.