A broader view of evidence-based programs reveals more options for state juvenile justice systems

Criminology and Public Policy

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 515-523

  Lipsey, Mark W ^a   Howell, James C ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883323231     PISSN: 15386473     EISSN: 17459133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00827.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Barnoski, Robert. 2004. Outcome Evaluation of Washington State's Research-Based Programs for Juvenile Offenders. Document No. 04-01-1201. Olympia : Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Retrieved from http://wsipp.wa.gov/.
2. Greenwood, Peter W. and Brandon C. Welsh. 2012. Promoting evidence-based practice in delinquency prevention at the state level: Principles, progress, and policy directions. Criminology & Public Policy. 11: 493-513.
3. Howell, James C. 2009. Preventing and Reducing Juvenile Delinquency: A Comprehensive Framework, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
4. Lipsey, Mark W. 2008. The Arizona Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) for Assessing the Effectiveness of Programs for Juvenile Probationers: SPEP Ratings and Relative Recidivism Reduction for the Initial SPEP Sample. A Report to the Juvenile Justice Services Division, Administrative Office of the Courts, State of Arizona. Center for Evaluation Research and Methodology, Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies. Retrieved from http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/peabody_research_institute/publications.xml.
5. Lipsey, Mark W. 2009. The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders, 4: 124-147.
6. Lipsey, Mark W. and Francis T. Cullen. 2007. The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3: 297-320.
7. Lipsey, Mark W., James C. Howell, Marion R. Kelly, Gabrielle Chapman, and Darin Carver. 2011. Improving the Effectiveness of Juvenile Justice Programs: A New Perspective on Evidence-Based Practice. Washington, DC : Georgetown University, Center for Juvenile Justice Reform.
8. Redpath, David P. and Jeanne K Brandner. 2010. The Arizona Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) for Assessing the Effectiveness of Programs for Juvenile Probationers: SPEP Rating and Relative Recidivism Reduction; An Update to the January 2008 Report by Dr. Mark Lipsey. Phoenix : Arizona Supreme Court, Administrative Office of the Courts, Juvenile Justice Service Division. Retrieved from http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/peabody_research_institute/publications.xml
9. Slobogin, Christopher and Mark R. Fondacaro. 2011. Juveniles at Risk: A Plea for Preventive Justice. New York : Oxford University Press.
10. Wilson, John J. and James C. Howell. 1993. A Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent and Chronic Juvenile Offenders. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.