Non-carious cervical lesions: Influence of morphology and load type on biomechanical behaviour of maxillary incisors

Australian Dental Journal

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 306-314

  Soares, Paulo Vinícius ^a   Santos Filho, P C F ^a   Soares, C J ^a   Faria, Vlg ^a   Naves, M F ^a   Michael, J A ^b   Kaidonis, J A ^b   Ranjitkar, S ^b   Townsend, G C ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Biomechanical behaviour; composite resin; finite element analysis; non carious cervical lesion; teeth

Indexed keywords

DENTAL MATERIAL; RESIN;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR; BIOMECHANICS; DENTAL PROCEDURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INCISOR; MASTICATION; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; NON-CARIOUS CERVICAL LESION; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE;

BIOMECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR; COMPOSITE RESIN; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; NON-CARIOUS CERVICAL LESION; TEETH;

BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BITE FORCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INCISOR; MAXILLA; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH ABRASION; TOOTH CERVIX;

EID: 84883302163     PISSN: 00450421     EISSN: 18347819     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/adj.12084     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Michael JA, Townsend GC, Greenwood LF, Kaidonis JA,. Abfraction: separating fact from fiction. Aust Dent J 2009; 54: 2-8.
2. Pecie R, Krejci I, Garcia-Godoy F, Bortolotto T,. Noncarious cervical lesions-a clinical concept based on the literature review. Part 1: prevention. Am J Dent 2011; 24: 49-56.
3. Rees JS, Hammadeh M, Jagger DC,. Abfraction lesion formation in maxillary incisors, canines and premolars: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111: 149-154.
4. Grippo JO, Simring M, Coleman TA,. Abfraction, abrasion, biocorrosion, and the enigma of noncarious cervical lesions: a 20-year perspective. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012; 24: 10-23.
5. Nguyen C, Ranjitkar S, Kaidonis JA, Townsend GC,. A qualitative assessment of non-carious cervical lesions in extracted human teeth. Aust Dent J 2008; 53: 46-51.
6. Kaidonis JA, Richards LC, Townsend GC,. Non-carious changes to tooth crowns. In:, Mount GJ, Hume WR, eds. Preservation and restoration of tooth structure. Brighton: Knowledge Books and Software, 2005: 47-60.
7. Rees JS,. A review of the biomechanics of abfraction. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2000; 8: 139-144.
8. Dejak B, Młotkowski A,. Finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of cast posts compared to glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts in anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2011; 105: 115-126.
9. Bartlett DW, Shah PA,. Critical review of non-carious cervical (wear) lesions and the role of abfraction, erosion, and abrasion. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 306-312.
10. Daley TJ, Harbrow DJ, Kahler B, Young WG,. The cervical wedge-shaped lesion in teeth: a light and electron microscopic study. Aust Dent J 2009; 54: 212-219.
11. Michael JA, Kaidonis JA, Townsend GC,. Non-carious cervical lesions on permanent anterior teeth: a new morphological classification. Aust Dent J 2010; 55: 134-137.
12. Ferracane JL,. Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29-38.
13. Soares CJ, Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, et al,. The influence of cavity design and glass fiber posts on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars. J Endod 2008; 34: 1015-1019.
14. Silva NR, Castro CG, Santos-Filho PC, et al,. Influence of different post design and composition on stress distribution in maxillary central incisor: finite element analysis. Indian J Dent Res 2009; 20: 153-158.
15. Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LR, Soares CJ,. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99: 30-37.
16. Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Gomide HA, et al,. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99: 114-122.
17. Giannini M, Soares CJ, de Carvalho RM,. Ultimate tensile strength of tooth structures. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 322-329.
18. Romeed SA, Malik R, Dunne SM,. Stress analysis of occlusal forces in canine teeth and their role in the development of non-carious cervical lesions: abfraction. Int J Dent 2012; Article ID 234845.
19. Kaidonis JA,. Tooth wear: the view of the anthropologist. Clin Oral Investig 2008; 12 (Suppl 1): S21-S26.
20. Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Queiroz EC, et al,. Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin. J Prosthodont 2008; 17: 114-119.
21. Stewardson D, Thornley P, Bigg T, et al,. The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice: part 1, baseline data. Br Dent J 2010; 208: E17.
22. Stewardson D, Creanor S, Thornley P, et al,. The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice: part 3, five-year survival. Br Dent J 2012; 212: E14.
23. Vandewalle KS, Vigil G,. Guidelines for the restoration of Class V lesions. Gen Dent 1997; 45: 254-260.
24. Ichim I, Schmidlin PR, Kieser JA, Swain MV,. Mechanical evaluation of cervical glass-ionomer restorations: 3D finite element study. J Dent 2007; 35: 28-35.