Automatic shoeprint retrieval system for use in forensic investigations

Proceedings of the 2005 UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence, UKCI 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 137-142

  Zhang, Lin ^a   Allinson, Nigel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRENT PRACTICES; EDGE INFORMATION; FORENSIC EVIDENCE; FORENSIC INVESTIGATION; REFERENCE DATABASE; RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; ROTATIONAL INVARIANCES; SHOEPRINT IMAGES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

QUERY PROCESSING;

EID: 84883294421     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Alexandre, G. (1996). Computer Classification of the Shoeprint of Burglar Shoes. Forensic Science International., Volume 82, pp59-65.
2. Alexander, A., Bouridane, A. & Crookes, D. (1999). Automatic Classification and Recognition of Shoeprints. Image Processing and its Applications, Seventh International Conference on, Volume 2, pp638-641.
3. Ashley, W. (1996). What Shoe was that? The use of computerised image database to assist in identification. Forensic Science International., Volume 82, pp67-79.
4. Bodziac, W.J. (2000). Footwear Impression Evidence Detection, Recovery and Examination, 2nd Edition. Published by CRC Press.
5. Bouridane, A., Alexander, A., Nibouche, M. & Crookes, D. (2000). Application of Fractals to the Detection and Classification of Shoeprints. Image Processing, Proceedings. International Conference on, Volume 1, pp474-477.
6. Canny, J. (1986). A computational Approach to Edge Detection. IEEE Trans. On Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. PAMI-8, pp679-698.
7. Chazal, P.D., Flynn, J. & Beilly, R.B. (2005). Automated Processing of Shoeprint Images Based on the Fourier Transform for Use in Forensic Science. IEEE Trans. On Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol 27, No.3, pp341-350.
8. Faloutsos, C., Barber, R., Flickner, M., Hafner, J., Niblack, W., Petkovic, D. & Equitz, W. (1994). Efficient and Effective Querying by Image Content. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, Vol. 3, pp 231-262.
9. Geradts, Z. & Keijzer, J. (1996). The Image Data REBEZO for Shoeprint with Developments for Automatic Classification of Shoe Outsole Designs. Forensic Science International., Volume 82, pp21-31.
10. Jain, A.K. & Vailaya, A. (1996). Image Retrieval using Color and Shape. Pattern Recognition, 29(8), pp1233-1244.
11. Keijzer, J., Geradts, Z. & Keereweer, I. (1995). A Nationwide Classification System for Shoe Outsoles Designs. Journal of Forensic Identification., Volume 45, pp30-37.
12. Mikkonen, S., Suominen, V. & Heinonen, P. (1996). Use of Footwear Impressions in Crime Scene Investigations Assisted by Computerised Footwear Collection System. Forensic Science International., Volume 82, pp67-79.
13. Mikkonen, S. & Astikainen, T. (1994). Databased Classification System for Shoe Sole Patterns: Identification of Partial Footwear Impression Found at a Scene of Crime. Journal of Forensic Science Volume 39, pp1227-1246.
14. Rix, B. (2004). The contribution of shoemark data to police intelligence, crime detection and prosecution. Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Research Report 236.
15. Sawyer, N. (1995). SHOE-FIT A Computerised Shoeprint Database. Institution of Electrical Engineers, UK.
16. Weickert, J. (1998). Anisotropic Diffusion in Image Processing. B.G. Teubner Sttutgart, Deutschland.
17. Yezzi A.,Modified curvature motion for image smoothing and enhancement, IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 1998 352.