The image-database REBEZO for shoeprints with developments on automatic classification of shoe outsole designs

Forensic Science International

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 21-31

  Geradts, Zeno ^a   Keijzer, Jan ^a  

^a Forensic Science Laboratory   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA BASE; FORENSIC SCIENCE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHOE;

EID: 0030587551     PISSN: 03790738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0379-0738(96)01963-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. [1] W.J. Bodziak, Footwear Impression Evidence, Elsevier, New York, 1990.
2. [2] W. Ashley, Shoe sole pattern file, State Forensic Science Laboratory, Victoria, Australia, International association of forensic studies; thematic symposia: footwear and type tread impressions, Adelaide, 1990 and European meeting for shoeprint toolmark examiners, May 8-11, 1995, National Bureau of Investigation, Finland.
3. [3] R.J. Davis, An intelligence approach to footwear marks and tool marks, J. Forensic Sci. Soc., 21 (1981) 183-193.
4. [4] T. Ebding, Spurennachweis und Spurenrecherche: Das Spuren-Recherche-System ISAS Pro. Kriminalistik, 11 (1994) 732-734.
5. [5] S. Mikkonen and T. Astikainen, Databased classification system for shoe sole patterns -Identification of partial footwear impression found at a scene of crime. J. Forensic Sci., 39(5) (1994) 1227-1236.
6. [6] Smithers Biomedical Systems, Kent, Ohio, United States.
7. [7] Program Khoros. developed by the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, more information can be found on internet at http://www.khoros.unm.edu or a sample article K. Konstantinides, J.R. Rasure, 'The Khoros software development environment for image and signal processing'. IEEE-Transactions on Image-Processing (USA), 3(3) (1994) 243-252.
8. [8] O.E. Facey, I.D. Hannah and D. Rosen, Shoe wear patterns and pressure distribution under feet and shoes, determined by image analysis. J. Forensic Sci. Soc., 32(1) 15-25.
9. [9] E.R. Davies, Machine Vision: Theory, Algorithms, Practicalities, Academic Press, 1990.
10. [10] C. Kingston, Neural networks in forensic science. J. Forensic Sci., 37(1) (1992) 252-264.
11. [11] T.W. Rauber, M.M. Barata and A.S. Steiger-Garçao, A toolbox for analysis and visualisation of sensor data in supervision, Universidade Nova de Lisboa - Intelligent Robotics Group, 2825. Monte de Caparica - Portugal - postscript document on internet ftp-address fct.unl.pt, 1994.
12. [12] J.W. Sammon Jr., A non-linear mapping for data structure analysis. IEEE Trans. on Computers, C-18(5) (1969) 401-409.
13. [13] D.E. Rumelhart, G.E. Hinton and R.J. Williams, Learning internal presentations by error propagation, In D.E. Rumelhart and J.L. McClelland (eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing; Exploration in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 1, MIT-Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.
14. [14] L. Pratt, Hair comparison with neural networks, internet address WWW http://vita-.mines.colorado.edu:3 857/0/1pratt/forensics.html, 1995.
15. [15] A. Khotanzad and J.H. Lu, Classification of invariant image representations using a neural network. IEEE Transactions Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 38 (1990) 1028-1038.
16. [16] S.S. Reddi, Radial and angular moment invariants for image identification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern recognition and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-3(2) (1981) 240-242.
17. [17] M. Hu, Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. IRE Transactions on Inf. Theory, IT-8 (1962) 179.
18. [18] Shuenn-Shyang Wang, Po-Cheng Chen, Wen-Gou Lin, Invariant pattern recognition by moment Fourier descriptor. Pattern Recognition, 27(12) 1735-1742.
19. [19] Yan-Song Chen, Shi-Hai Zheng, De-Hua Li, Extracting invariant moments of images by a hybrid optical processor for pattern recognition. Proc. of the SPIE - The Int. Soc. for Opt. Eng., 1702, 192-198.