Neighbourhood social ties: How much do residential, physical and virtual mobility matter?

British Journal of Sociology

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 425-452

  Knies, Gundi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Family ties; Internet; Mobility; Neighbourhood; Social interactions; SOEP; Transport

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DEMOGRAPHY; FAMILY; FAMILY TIES; GERMANY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILITY; NEIGHBORHOOD; OBJECT RELATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; SOEP; TRANSPORT; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

FAMILY TIES; INTERNET; MOBILITY; NEIGHBOURHOOD; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; SOEP; TRANSPORT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DATA COLLECTION; FAMILY; GERMANY; HUMANS; INTERNET; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MIDDLE AGED; OBJECT ATTACHMENT; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84883289246     PISSN: 00071315     EISSN: 14684446     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12026     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. ARD/ZDF-Arbeitsgruppe Multimedia 1999 'ARD/ZDF-Online-Studie 1999: Wird Online Alltagsmedium?', Media Perspektiven 8: 401-414.
2. Aronson, S.H. 1971 'The Sociology of the Telephone', International Journal of Comparative Sociology 12(3): 153-167.
3. Belot, M. and Ermisch, J. 2009 'Friendship Ties and Geographical Mobility: Evidence from Great Britain', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 172(2): 427-442.
4. Dietz, R.D. 2002 'The Estimation of Neighborhood Effects in the Social Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Approach', Social Science Research 31(4): 539-575.
5. Diewald, M. 1991 Soziale Beziehungen: Verlust oder Liberalisierung? Soziale Unterstützung in informellen Netzwerken, Berlin: Edition Sigma.
6. Durkheim, E. 1893 The Division of Labour in Society, New York: Macmillan.
7. ECIN 2002 'Digital Divide in Deutschland: Ein Ost-West-Problem?', Vol. 2006: http://www.ecin.de/news/2002/06/05/04363.
8. Etzioni, A. 1993 The Spirit of the Community. Rights, Responsibilities and the Communitarian Agenda, New York: Crown Publishers.
9. Feiring, C. and Lewis, M. 1991 'The Development of Social Networks from Early to Middle Childhood: Gender Differences and the Relation to School Competence', Sex Roles 25: 237-253.
10. Friedrichs, J., Galster, G.C. and Musterd, S. 2003 'Neighbourhood Effects on Social Opportunities: The European and American Research and Policy Context', Housing Studies 18(6): 797-806.
11. Greene, W.H. and Henscher, D.A. 2010 Modeling Ordered Choices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Haisken-DeNew, J., Pischner, R. and Wagner, G.G. 2000 'Computer- und Internetnutzung hängen stark von Einkommen und Bildung ab - geschlechtsspezifische Nutzungsunterschiede in der Freizeit besonders ausgeprägt', Wochenbericht des DIW Berlin 41.
13. Haisken-DeNew, J., Pischner, R. and Wagner, G.G. 2001 'Private Internet-Nutzung: Bildung und Einkommen auch bei Jugendlichen von großer Bedeutung', Wochenbericht des DIW Berlin 40.
14. Häußermann, H. 1994 'Das Erkenntnisinteresse von Gemeindestudien. Zur De- und Rethematisierung lokaler und regionaler Kultur', in H.-U. Derlien, U. Gerhardt and F.W. Scharpf (eds) Systemrationalität und Partialinteresse, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
15. Hendrix, L. 1976 'Kinship, Social Networks, and Integration Among Ozark Residents and Out-Migrants', Journal of Marriage and Family 38(1): 97-104.
16. Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T.W. 1974 'Gemeindestudien', in M. Horkheimer and T.W. Adorno (eds) Soziologische Exkurse, Frankfurt am Main: EVA.
17. Isengard, B. 2005 'Unterschiede im Freizeitverhalten: Ausdruck sozialer Ungleichheitsstrukturen oder Ergebnis individualisierter Lebensfuehrung?', KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 57(2): 254-277.
18. Kasarda, J.D. and Janowitz, M. 1974 'Community Attachment in Mass Society', American Sociological Review 39(3): 328-339.
19. Kenyon, S., Rafferty, J. and Lyons, G. 2003 'Social Exclusion and Transport: A Role for Virtual Accessibility in the Alleviation of Mobility Related Social Exclusion?', Journal of Social Policy 32(3): 317-338.
20. Klages, H. 1958 Der Nachbarschaftsgedanke und die nachbarliche Wirklichkeit in der Grossstadt Cologne: Obladen.
21. Kling, J.R. and Liebman, J.B. 2004 'Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects on Youth', NBER Working Paper 11577.
22. Knies, G. 2007 'Mobility Effects on Neighbourliness', in G. Knies, Neighbourhood Effects in Germany, Ph.D. dissertation, Bristol: University of Bristol, pp. 133-171.
23. Knies, G. 2009a 'The Effects of Mobility on Neighbourhood Social Ties', SOEPpapers, no 175, Berlin: DIW Berlin.
24. Knies, G. 2009b 'The Effects of Mobility on Neighbourhood Social Ties', ISER Working Paper, no. 2009-15, Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research.
25. Knies, G. 2012 'Income Comparisons Among Neighbours and Satisfaction in East and West Germany', Social Indicators Research 106(3): 471-489.
26. Köllinger, P. 2003 'Internetnutzung in Deutschland: Nach Boom nun langsamerer Anstieg erwartet', Wochenbericht des DIW Berlin 30.
27. König, R. 1958 Grundformen der Gesellschaft: Die Gemeinde, Hamburg: Rowohlt.
28. Larsen, J., Urry, J. and Axhausen, K. 2006 Mobilities, Networks, Geographies, Abindon, Oxon: Ashgate Publishing Group.
29. Lee, B.A. and Campbell, K.E. 1999 'Neighbor Networks of Black and White Americans', in B. Wellman (ed) Networks in the Global Village. Life in Contemporary Communities, Colorado & Oxford: Westview Press.
30. Litwak, E. 1960 'Geographic Mobility and Extended Family Cohesion', American Sociological Review 25(3): 385-394.
31. Logan, J.R. and Spitze, G.D. 1994 'Family Neighbors', American Journal of Sociology 100(2): 453-476.
32. Lynd, R.S. and Lynd, H.M. 1929 Middletown. A Study in Contemporary American Culture, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
33. Matei, S. and Ball-Rokeach, S.J. 2001 'Real and Virtual Social Ties. Connections in Everyday Lives of Seven Ethnic Neighbourhoods', American Behavioral Scientist 45(3): 550-564.
34. Mayntz, R. 1958 Soziale Schichtung und sozialer Wandel in einer Industriegemeinde: Eine soziologische Untersuchung der Stadt Euskirchen, Stuttgart: Enke.
35. Nie, N.H. 2001 'Sociability, Interpersonal Relations, and the Internet - Reconciling Conflicting Findings', American Behavioral Scientist 45(3): 420-435.
36. Park, R.E. and Burgess, E.W. 1925 The City. Suggestions for Investigation of Human Behaviour in the Urban Environment, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
37. Paugam, S. and Russel, H. 2000 'The Effects of Employment Precarity and Unemployment on Social Isolation', in D. Gallie and S. Paugam (eds) Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Pelizäus-Hoffmeister, H. 2001 Mobilität: Chance oder Risiko für soziale Beziehungen? Soziale Netzwerke unter den Bedingungen räumlicher Mobilität - das Beispiel freie Journalistinnen, Obladen: Leske + Budrich.
39. Pickup, L. and Giuliano, G. 2005 'Transport and Social Exclusion in the US', in K. Donaghy, S. Poppelreuter and G. Rudinger (eds) Social Dimensions of Sustainable Transport: Transatlantic Perspectives, London: Ashgate.
40. Robinson, J.P. and Martin, S. 2010 'IT Use and Declining Social Capital?', Social Science Computer Review 28(1): 45-63.
41. Sampson, R.J. 2001 'Linking the Micro- and Macrolevel Dimensions of Community Social Organisation', Social Forces 70(1): 43-64.
42. Sampson, R.J., Morenoff, J.D. and Gannon-Rowley, T. 2002 'Assessing "Neighborhood Effects": Social Processes and New Directions in Research', Annual Review of Sociology 28: 443-478.
43. Schmitt, C. 2005 'Informelle soziale Beziehungen, in SOFI, IAB, ISF and INIFES (eds) Berichterstattung zur sozio-oekonomischen Entwicklung in Deutschland. Arbeit und Lebensweisen. Erster Bericht, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fuer Sozialwissenschaften.
44. Shklovski, I., Kraut, R. and Rainie, L. 2004 'The Internet and Social Participation: Contrasting Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses', Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(1).
45. Simmel, G. 1908 'Group Expansion and the Development of Individuality', in D.N. Levine (ed) Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. StataCorp 2009 Statistical Software: Release 11.0, College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
47. Tobey, R., Wetherell, C. and Brigham, J. 1990 'Moving Out and Settling In: Residential Mobility, Home Owning, and the Public Enframing of Citizenship, 1921-1950', American Historical Review 95(5): 1395-1422.
48. Tönnies, F. 1887 Community and Association, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
49. van Eimeren, B. and Gerhard, H. 2000 'ARD/ZDF-Online-Studie 2000: Gebrauchswert entscheidet ueber Internetnutzung', Media Perspektiven 8: 338-349.
50. Vierecke, K.D. 1972 Nachbarschaft. Ein Beitrag zur Stadtsoziologie, Vol. 4, Cologne: Verlag J. P. Bachem.
51. Wagner, G.G., Frick, J.R. and Schupp, J. 2007 'The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Scope, Evolution and Enhancements', Schmollers Jahrbuch 127(1): 139-169.
52. Weber, M. 1956 Wirtschaft Und Gesellschaft, Tübingen: Mohr.
53. Wellman, B. 1979 'The Community Question. The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers', American Journal of Sociology 84(5): 1201-1231.
54. Wellman, B. 2001a 'The Persistence and Transformation of Community: From Neighbourhood Groups to Social Networks', Toronto: Law Commission of Canada.
55. Wellman, B. 2001b 'Physical Place and Cyberplace: The Rise of Personalized Networking', International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25(2): 227-252.
56. Wellman, B. and Leighton, B. 1979 'Networks, Neighborhoods, and Communities', Urban Affairs Quarterly 14(3): 363-390.
57. Wirth, L. 1938 'Urbanism as a Way of Life', American Journal of Sociology 44(1): 1-24.
58. Zapf, K., Heil, K.H. and Rudolph, J. 1969 Stadt am Stadtrand. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung in vier Münchner Neubausiedlungen, Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.