-
1
-
-
84883266752
-
-
[ http://www.netscc.ac.uk/glossary/ (date last accessed, 16 August 2013)]
-
NETSCC definition of pilot and feasibility studies [ http://www.netscc. ac.uk/glossary/ (date last accessed, 16 August 2013)]
-
NETSCC Definition of Pilot and Feasibility Studies
-
-
-
2
-
-
77954554568
-
What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy
-
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/10/67 (date last accessed 19 August 2013) 10.1186/1471-2288-10-67 20637084
-
What is a pilot or feasibility study? a review of current practice and editorial policy. Arain M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, Lancaster GA, BMC Med Res Methodol 2010 10 67 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/10/67 (date last accessed 19 August 2013) 10.1186/1471-2288-10-67 20637084
-
(2010)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.10
, pp. 67
-
-
Arain, M.1
Campbell, M.J.2
Cooper, C.L.3
Lancaster, G.A.4
-
3
-
-
84861183854
-
Optimal sample sizes for phase II clinical trials and pilot studies
-
10.1002/sim.4357 22052407
-
Optimal sample sizes for phase II clinical trials and pilot studies. Stallard N, Stat Med 2012 31 1031 1042 10.1002/sim.4357 22052407
-
(2012)
Stat Med
, vol.31
, pp. 1031-1042
-
-
Stallard, N.1
-
4
-
-
77249142355
-
A tutorial on pilot studies: The what, why and how
-
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/10/1 (date last accessed 19 August 2013) 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1 20053272
-
A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, et al. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010 10 1 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/10/1 (date last accessed 19 August 2013) 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1 20053272
-
(2010)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.10
, pp. 1
-
-
Thabane, L.1
Ma, J.2
Chu, R.3
Cheng, J.4
Ismaila, A.5
Rios, L.P.6
-
5
-
-
0024528537
-
The potential uses of pilot work
-
10.1097/00006199-198901000-00015 2911515
-
The potential uses of pilot work. Prescott PA, Soeken KL, Nurs Res 1989 38 60 62 10.1097/00006199-198901000-00015 2911515
-
(1989)
Nurs Res
, vol.38
, pp. 60-62
-
-
Prescott, P.A.1
Soeken, K.L.2
-
6
-
-
42949170914
-
Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies
-
10.1002/nur.20247 18183564
-
Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Hertzog MA, Res Nurs Health 2008 31 180 191 10.1002/nur.20247 18183564
-
(2008)
Res Nurs Health
, vol.31
, pp. 180-191
-
-
Hertzog, M.A.1
-
7
-
-
10644225889
-
Sample sizes for estimation in clinical research
-
DOI 10.1002/pst.125
-
Sample sizes for estimation in clinical research. Julious SA, Patterson SD, Pharm Stat 2004 3 213 215 10.1002/pst.125 (Pubitemid 39654842)
-
(2004)
Pharmaceutical Statistics
, vol.3
, Issue.3
, pp. 213-215
-
-
Julious, S.A.1
Patterson, S.D.2
-
8
-
-
0029162725
-
On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination
-
10.1002/sim.4780141709 8532986
-
On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Browne RH, Stat Med 1995 14 1933 1940 10.1002/sim.4780141709 8532986
-
(1995)
Stat Med
, vol.14
, pp. 1933-1940
-
-
Browne, R.H.1
-
9
-
-
29544433886
-
Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study
-
DOI 10.1002/pst.185
-
Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Julious SA, Pharm Stat 2005 4 287 291 10.1002/pst.185 (Pubitemid 43013602)
-
(2005)
Pharmaceutical Statistics
, vol.4
, Issue.4
, pp. 287-291
-
-
Julious, S.A.1
-
10
-
-
84856013568
-
The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency
-
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.011 22169081
-
The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. Sim J, Lewis M, J Clin Epidemiol 2012 65 301 308 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.011 22169081
-
(2012)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.65
, pp. 301-308
-
-
Sim, J.1
Lewis, M.2
-
11
-
-
0018974024
-
Statistics and ethics in medical research. III. How large a sample?
-
Statistics and ethics in medical research lll: How large a sample? Altman DG, Br Med J 1980 281 1336 1338 10.1136/bmj.281.6251.1336 7437789 (Pubitemid 10029868)
-
(1980)
British Medical Journal
, vol.281
, Issue.6251
, pp. 1336-1338
-
-
Altman, D.G.1
-
12
-
-
3042664421
-
Design and analysis of pilot studies: Recommendations for good practice
-
Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR, J Eval Clin Pract 2002 10 2 307 312
-
(2002)
J Eval Clin Pract
, vol.10
, Issue.2
, pp. 307-312
-
-
Lancaster, G.A.1
Dodd, S.2
Williamson, P.R.3
-
13
-
-
84883302420
-
-
UKCRN, date last accessed, 20 March 2013)
-
UKCRN, http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/search/ (date last accessed, 20 March 2013)
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
84878754441
-
-
NIHR [cited 2013 15 March]; Available from: [date last accessed 20th March 2013]
-
NIHR, NIHR clinical research network portfolio 2013 [cited 2013 15 March]; Available from: http://www.crncc.nihr.ac.uk/about-us/processes/ portfolio/portfolio, [date last accessed 20th March 2013]
-
(2013)
NIHR Clinical Research Network Portfolio
-
-
-
16
-
-
84857099891
-
Recommendations for planning pilot studies in clinical and translational research
-
10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00347.x 22029804
-
Recommendations for planning pilot studies in clinical and translational research. Moore CG, Carter RE, Nietert PJ, Stewart PW, Clin Transl Sci 2011 4 5 332 337 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00347.x 22029804
-
(2011)
Clin Transl Sci
, vol.4
, Issue.5
, pp. 332-337
-
-
Moore, C.G.1
Carter, R.E.2
Nietert, P.J.3
Stewart, P.W.4
-
17
-
-
77955506490
-
Outcome reporting among drug trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
-
10.7326/0003-4819-153-3-201008030-00006 20679560
-
Outcome reporting among drug trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. Bourgeois FT, Murthy S, Mandl KD, Ann Intern Med 2010 153 158 166 10.7326/0003-4819-153-3-201008030-00006 20679560
-
(2010)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.153
, pp. 158-166
-
-
Bourgeois, F.T.1
Murthy, S.2
Mandl, K.D.3
-
18
-
-
0028839815
-
Sample sizes for dichotomous, ordered categorical and continuous outcomes in two group comparisons
-
With Erratrum 1996, 312, 96 10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1145
-
Sample sizes for dichotomous, ordered categorical and continuous outcomes in two group comparisons. Campbell MJ, Julious SA, Altman DG, Br Med J 1995 311 1145 1148 With Erratrum 1996, 312, 96 10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1145
-
(1995)
Br Med J
, vol.311
, pp. 1145-1148
-
-
Campbell, M.J.1
Julious, S.A.2
Altman, D.G.3
|