Soybean leaf hydraulic conductance does not acclimate to growth at elevated [CO2] or temperature in growth chambers or in the field

Annals of Botany

Volumn 112, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 911-918

  Locke, Anna M ^a   Sack, Lawren ^b   Bernacchi, Carl J ^a,c   Ort, Donald R ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

climate change; elevated CO2; Glycine max; Leaf hydraulic conductance; soybean; temperature; water potential

Indexed keywords

ACCLIMATION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; GAS EXCHANGE; GROWTH; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SOYBEAN; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; TRANSPIRATION;

EID: 84883252515     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct143     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aasamaa K, Niinemets U, Sõber A. 2005. Leaf hydraulic conductance in relation to anatomical and functional traits during Populus tremula leaf ontogeny. Tree Physiology 25: 1409-1418.
2. Ainsworth EA, Long SP. 2005. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)?Ameta-analytic reviewof the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytologist 165: 351-371.
3. Allen Jr LH, Pan D, Boote KJ, Pickering NB, Jones JW. 2003. Carbon dioxide and temperature effects on evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of soybean. Agronomy Journal 95: 1071-1981.
4. Bernacchi CJ, Kimball BA, Quarles DR, Long SP, Ort DR.2007. Decreases in stomatal conductance of soybean under open-air elevation of [CO2] are closely coupled with decreases in ecosystem evapotranspiration. Plant Physiology 143: 134-144.
5. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM. 2003. Changes in leaf hydraulic conductance during leaf shedding in seasonally dry tropical forest. New Phytologist 158: 295-303.
6. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM. 2004. Diurnal depression of leaf hydraulic conductance in a tropical tree species. Plant, Cell and Environment 27: 820-827.
7. Brodribb TJ, Jordan GJ. 2008. Internal coordination between hydraulics and stomatal control in leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment 31: 1557-1564.
8. Brodribb TJ, Jordan GJ. 2011. Water supply and demand remain balanced during leaf acclimation of Nothofagus cunninghamii trees. New Phytologist 192: 437-448.
9. Brodribb TJ, Feild TS, Jordan GJ. 2007. Leaf maximum photosynthetic rate and venation are linked by hydraulics. Plant Physiology 144: 1890-1898.
10. Bunce JA. 1996. Growth at elevated carbon dioxide concentration reduces hydraulic conductance in alfalfa and soybean. Global Change Biology 2: 155-158.
11. Bunce JA, Ziska LH. 1998. Decreased hydraulic conductance in plants at elevated carbon dioxide. Plant, Cell and Environment 21: 121-126.
12. Cohen JE. 1988. Statisticalpoweranalysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Domec J-C, Palmroth S, Ward E, Maier CA, Thérézien M, Oren R. 2009. Acclimation of leaf hydraulic conductance and stomatal conductance of Pinus taeda (loblolly pine) to long-term growth in elevated CO2 (free-air CO2 enrichment) and N-fertilization. Plant, Cell and Environment 32: 1500-1512.
14. Flexas J, Barbour MM, Brendel O, et al. 2012. Mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2: An unappreciated central player in photosynthesis. Plant Science 193-194: 70-84.
15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2010. Food and agricultural commodities production. Rome: FAO.
16. Hewitt EJ. 1966. Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition. London: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau.
17. Hubbard RM, Bond BJ, Ryan MG.1999. Evidence that hydraulic conductance limits photosynthesis in old Pinus ponderosa trees. Tree Physiology 19: 165-172.
18. Leakey ADB, Bernacchi CJ, Ort DR, Long SP. 2006. Long-term growth of soybean at elevated [CO2] does not cause acclimation of stomatal conductance under fully open-air conditions. Plant, Cell and Environment 29: 1794-1800.
19. Maherali H, DeLucia EH. 2000. Interactive effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on water transport in ponderosa pine. American Journal of Botany 87: 243-249.
20. Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, et al. 2007. Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Quin D, Manning M, et al eds. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Mudge JF, Baker LF, Edge CB, Houlahan JE. 2012. Setting an optimal a that minimizes errors in null hypothesis significance tests. PLoS One 7: E32734.
22. Nardini A, Salleo S. 2000. Limitation of stomatal conductance by hydraulic traits: Sensing or preventing xylem cavitation? Trees 15: 14-24.
23. Nardini A, Raimondo F, Lo Gullo MA, Salleo S. 2010. Leafminers help us understand leaf hydraulic design. Plant, Cell and Environment 33: 1091-1100.
24. OsborneCP, SackL. 2012.Evolution ofC4plants: A newhypothesis foran interaction of CO2 and water relations mediated by plant hydraulics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367: 583-600.
25. Rogers A, Allen DJ, Davey PA, et al. 2004. Leaf photosynthesis and carbohydrate dynamics of soybeans grown throughout their life-cycle under Free-Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment. Plant, Cell and Environment 27: 449-458.
26. Ruiz-Vera UM, Siebers M, Gray SB, et al. 2013. Globalwarming can negate the expected CO2 stimulation in photosynthesis and productivity for soybean grown in the Midwest United States. Plant Physiology 162: 410-423.
27. Sack L, Frole K. 2006. Leaf structural diversity is related to hydraulic capacity in tropical rain forest trees. Ecology 87: 483-491.
28. Sack L, Holbrook NM. 2006. Leaf hydraulics. Annual Review of Plant Biology 57: 361-381.
29. Sack L, Scoffoni C. 2013. Leaf venation: Structure, function, development, evolution, ecology, and applications in past, present, and future. New Phytologist 198: 983-1000.
30. Sack L, Melcher PJ, Zwieniecki MA, Holbrook NM.2002. The hydraulic conductance of the angiosperm leaf lamina: A comparison of three measurement methods. Journal of Experimental Botany 53: 2177-2184.
31. Sack L, Cowan PD, Jaikumar N, Holbrook NM. 2003. The 'hydrology' of leaves: Co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant, Cell and Environment 26: 1343-1356.
32. Sack L, Streeter CM, Holbrook NM. 2004. Hydraulic analysis of water flow through leaves of sugar maple and red oak. Plant Physiology 134: 1824-1833.
33. Salleo S, Nardini A, Pitt F, Lo Gullo MA.2000. Xylem cavitation and hydraulic control of stomatal conductance in laurel (Laurus nobilis L). Plant, Cell and Environment 23: 71-79.
34. Scoffoni C, Pou A, Aasamaa K, Sack L. 2008. The rapid light response of leaf hydraulic conductance: New evidence from two experimental methods. Plant, Cell and Environment 31: 1803-1812.
35. Sellin A, Kupper P. 2007. Temperature, light and leaf hydraulic conductance of little-leaf linden (Tilia cordata) in a mixed forest canopy. Tree Physiology 27: 679-688.
36. Sober A. 1997. Hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance, and maximal photosynthetic rate in bean leaves. Photosynthetica 34: 599-603.
37. Tsuda M, Tyree MT. 2000. Plant hydraulic conductance measured by the high pressure flow meter in crop plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 823-828.
38. Uhl D, MosbruggerV. 1999. Leaf venation density as a climate and environmental proxy: A critical review and new data. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 149: 15-26.
39. Yang S, Tyree MT. 1993. Hydraulic resistance in Acer saccharum shoots and its influence on leaf water potential and transpiration. Tree Physiology 12: 231-242.
40. Yang Z, Sinclair TR, Zhu M, Messina CD, Cooper M, Hammer GL. 2012. Temperature effect on transpiration response of maize plants to vapour pressure deficit. Environmental and Experimental Botany 78: 157-162.
41. Zhang Y-J, Meinzer FC, Hao G-Y, et al. 2009. Size-dependent mortality in a Neotropical savanna tree: The role of height-related adjustments in hydraulic architecture and carbon allocation. Plant, Cell and Environment 32: 1456-1466.