Anti-biofouling conducting polymer nanoparticles as a label-free optical contrast agent for high resolution subsurface biomedical imaging

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 35, 2013, Pages 8925-8940

  Au, Kin Man ^a   Lu, Zenghai ^a   Matcher, Stephen J ^a   Armes, Steven P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conducting polymer nanoparticles; Optical coherence tomography; Optical contrast agent; Protein nanoparticle interactions; Subsurface imaging

Indexed keywords

CONDUCTING POLYMER NANOPARTICLES; OLIGO(ETHYLENE GLYCOL) METHACRYLATE; OPTICAL CONTRAST AGENT; PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITION; POLY (VINYL ALCOHOL) (PVA); SPECTROSCOPIC MEASUREMENTS; STATISTICAL COPOLYMERS; SUB-SURFACE IMAGING;

CONDUCTING POLYMERS; ETHYLENE GLYCOL; INFRARED DEVICES; MEDICAL IMAGING; OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYPYRROLES; TISSUE;

NANOPARTICLES;

2 ((METHACRYLOYLOXY)ETHYL AMINOCARBOXYMETHYL)THIOPHENE; ANTIFOULING AGENT; CONDUCTING POLYMER NANOPARTICLE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; COPOLYMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; NANOPARTICLE; OPTICAL CONTRAST AGENT; POLY(2 (METHACRYLOYLOXY)ETHYLAMINOCARBOXYMETHYL)THIOPHENE OLIGO(ETHYLENE GLYCOL) METHACRYLIC ACID; POLYPYRROLE; POLYVINYL ALCOHOL; THIOPHENE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHICKEN; COLLOID; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISK CENTRIFUGE PHOTOSEDIMENTOMETRY; EX VIVO STUDY; IN VITRO STUDY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; LIGHT SCATTERING; NONHUMAN; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OPTICS; PARTICLE SIZE; PHANTOM; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SKIN; SUBSURFACE IMAGING; SWINE; SYNTHESIS; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROSCOPY; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

SUS;

CONDUCTING POLYMER NANOPARTICLES; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OPTICAL CONTRAST AGENT; PROTEIN-NANOPARTICLE INTERACTIONS; SUBSURFACE IMAGING;

ANIMALS; BIOFOULING; CHICKENS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EMULSIONS; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; NANOPARTICLES; PARTICLE SIZE; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMERS; PYRROLES; SKIN; SOYBEAN OIL; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, INFRARED; SWINE; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 84883218331     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.094     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Huang D.D., Swanson E.A., Lin C.P., Schuman J.S., Stinson W.G., Chang W., et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991, 254(5035):1178-1181.
2. Fujimoto J.G., Brezinski M.E., Tearney G.J., Boppart S.A., Bouma B., Hee M.R., et al. Optical biopsy and imaging using optical coherence tomography. Nat Med 1995, 1:970-972.
3. Drexler W., Morgner U., Ghanta R.K., Kärtner F.X., Schuman J.S., Fujimoto J.G. Ultrahigh-resolution ophthalmic optical coherence tomography. Nat Med 2000, 7:502-507.
4. Choma M.A., Sarunic M.V., Yang C., Izatt J.A. Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2003, 11(18):2183-2189.
5. Sivak M.V., Kobayashi K., Izatt J.A., Rollins A.M., Ung-Runyawee R., Clak A., et al. High-resolution endoscopic imaging of the GI tract using optical coherence tomography. Gastrointest Endosc 2000, 51(4):474-479.
6. Vakoc B.J., Fukumura D., Jain R.K., Bouma B.E. Cancer imaging by optical coherence tomography: preclinical progress and clinical potential. Nat Rev Cancer 2012, 12(5):363-368.
7. Ko H.J., Tan W., Boppart S.A. Optical coherence elastography of engineered and developing tissue. Tissue Eng 2006, 12(1):63-73.
8. Zhou X.M., Sun J.B., Yuan H.P., Wu D.L., Zhou X.R., Sun D.W., et al. Arat model for studying neural stem cell transplantation. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2009, 30:1496-1504.
9. Park B.H., Saxer C., Srinivas S.M., Nelson J.S., de Boer J.F. Invivo burn depth determination by high-speed fiber-based polarisation sensitive optical coherence tomography. JBiomed Opt 2001, 6(4):474-479.
10. Boppart S.A., Oldenburg A.L., Xu C., Marks D.L. Optical probes and techniques for molecular contrast enhancement in coherence imaging. JBiomed Opt 2005, 10(4):041208.
11. Wang R.K., Xu X., Tuchin V.V., Elder J.B. Depolarization and blurring of optical images by biological tissue. JOpt Soc Am A 2001, 18(4):948-960.
12. Wang R.K., Elder J.B. Propylene glycol as a contrast agent for optical coherence tomography to image gastrointestinal tissues. Laser Surg Med 2002, 30(3):201-208.
13. Dobre G.M., Podoleanu A.G., Rosen R.B. Simultaneous optical coherence tomography - indocyanine green dye fluorescence imaging system for investigations of eye's fundus. Opt Lett 2005, 30(1):58-60.
14. Chang H., Sun T., Li Z.Y., Chen J., Wiley B.J., Xia Y., et al. Gold nanocages as contrast agents for spectroscopic optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 2005, 30(22):3048-3050.
15. Oldenburg A.L., Hansen M.N., Zweifel D.A., Wei A., Boppart S.A. Plasmon-resonant gold nanorods as low backscattering albedo contrast agents for optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2006, 14(15):6724-6738.
16. Tseng H.Y., Lee C.K., Wu S.Y., Chi T.T., Yang K.M., Wang J.Y., et al. Au nanorings for enhancing absorption and backscattering monitored with optical coherence tomography. Nanotechnology 2010, 21(29):295102.
17. Gobin A.M., Lee M.H., Halas N.J., James W.D., Drezek R.A., West J.L. Near-infrared resonant nanoshells for combined optical imaging and photothermal cancer therapy. Nano Lett 2007, 7(7):1929-1934.
18. Ma L.L., Feldman M.D., Tam J.M., Paranjape A.S., Cheruku K.K., Larson T.A., et al. Small multifunctional nanoclusters (nanoroses) for targeted cellular imaging and therapy. ACS Nano 2009, 3(9):2686-2696.
19. Acosta M.M., Boyce H.W. Chromoendoscopy - where is it useful?. JClin Gastroenterol 1998, 27(1):13-20.
20. Fennerty M.B. Tissue staining (chromoscopy) of the gastrointestinal tract. Can J Gastroenterol 1999, 13(5):423-429.
21. The United States Food and Drug Administration medical device regulation guideline (based on definition under Section 201(h) of the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C)) June 2013, [online]. Available from URL:. http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm259059.htm/.
22. McNeill R., Siudak R., Wardlaw J.H., Weiss D.E. Electronic conduction in polymers. I. The chemical structure of polypyrrole. Aust J Chem 1963, 16(6):1056-1075.
23. Saunder B.R., Fleming R.J., Murray K.S. Recent advances in the physical and spectroscopic properties of polypyrrole films, particularly those containing transition-metal complexes as counterions. Chem Mater 1995, 7(6):1082-1094.
24. Bjorklund R.B., Lieberg B. Electrically conducting composites of colloidal polypyrrole and methylcellulose. JChem Soc Chem Commun 1986, 16:1293-1294.
25. Bai M.Y., Cheung Y.J., Wickline S.A., Xia Y. Colloidal hollow spheres of conducting polymers with smooth surface and uniform, controllable sizes. Small 2009, 5(15):1747-1752.
26. Ge J., Neofytou E., Cahill T.J., Beygui R.E., Zare R.N. Drug release from electric-field-responsive nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2012, 6(1):227-233.
27. Pope M.R., Armes S.P., Tarcha P.J. Specific activity of polypyrrole nanoparticulate immunoreagents: comparison of surface chemistry and immobilization options. Bioconjug Chem 1996, 7(4):436-444.
28. Zha Z., Yue X., Ren Q., Dai Z. Uniform polypyrrole nanoparticles with high photothermal conversion efficiency for photothermal ablation of cancer cells. Adv Mater 2013, 25(5):777-782.
29. Au K.M., Lu Z., Matcher S.J., Armes S.P. Polypyrrole nanoparticles: a potential optical coherence tomography contrast agent for cancer imaging. Adv Mater 2011, 23(48):5792-5795.
30. Harder P., Grunze M., Dahint R., Whitesides G.M., Laibinis P.E. Molecular conformation in oligo(ethylene glycol)-terminated self-assembled monolayers on gold and silver surfaces determines their ability to resist protein adsorption. JPhys Chem B 1998, 102(2):426-436.
31. Dalsin J.L., Hu B.H., Lee B.P. Mussel adhesive protein mimetic polymers for preparation of nonfouling surfaces. JAm Chem Soc 2003, 125:4253-4258.
32. Au K.M., Armes S.P. Heterocoagulation as a facile route to prepare stable serum albumin-nanoparticle conjugates for biomedical applications: synthetic protocols and mechanistic insights. ACS Nano 2012, 6(9):8261-8279.
33. Genies E.M., Bidan G., Diaz A.F. Spectroelectrochemical study of polypyrrole films. JElectroanal Chem 1983, 149(1-2):101-113.
34. Simmons M.R., Chaloner P.A., Armes S.P., Greaves S.J., Watts J.F. Synthesis and characterization of colloidal polypyrrole particles using reactive polymeric stabilizer. Langmuir 1998, 14(3):611-618.
35. Aguilar-Hernàndez J., Potje-Kamloth K. Optical and electrical characterization of a conducting polypyrrole composite prepared by in situ electropolymerization. Phys Chem Chem Phys 1999, 1:1735-1742.
36. Armes S.P., Miller J.F., Vincent B. Aqueous dispersions of electrically conducting monodisperse polypyrrole particles. JColloid Interface Sci 1987, 118(2):401-406.
37. Kato H., Nishikawa O., Matsui T., Honma S., Kokado H. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy study of conducting polymer polypyrrole: higher order structure of electrochemically-synthesized film. JPhys Chem 1991, 95(15):6014-6016.
38. Yao R., Xu D.F., Li Q., Weng S., Yang Y., Xu Z.H., et al. Study on the hydration of poly(vinyl acetate) by FTIR spectroscopy. Proc SPIE 1992, 1575:350.
39. Trmcic-Cvitas J., Hasan E., Ramstedt M., Li X., Cooper M.A., Abell C., et al. Biofunctionalized protein resistant oligo(ethylene glycol)-derived polymer brushes as selective immobilization and sensing platforms. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10(10):2885-2894.
40. McCarthy S.J., Meijs G.F., Mitchell N., Gunatillake P.A., Heath G., Brandwood A., et al. In-vivo degradation of polyurethanes: transmission-FTIR microscopic characterization of polyurethanes sectioned by cryomicrotomy. Biomaterials 1997, 18(21):1387-1409.
41. High resolution XPS of organic polymers: the scienta ESCA300 database 1992, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 1st ed. G. Beamson, D. Briggs (Eds.).
42. Hucknall A., Simnick A.J., Hill R.T., Chilkoti A., Garcia A., Johannes M.S., et al. Biointerphase 2009, 4(2):FA50-7.
43. Zotti G., Zecchin S., Schiavon G., Louwet F., Groenendaal L., Crispin X., et al. Electrochemical and XPS studies toward the role of monomeric and polymeric sulfonate counterions in the synthesis, composition, and properties of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). Macromolecules 2003, 36(9):3337-3344.
44. Bredas J.L., Scott J.C., Yakushi K., Street G.B. Polarons and bipolarons in polypyrrole in polypyrrole: evolution of the band structure and optical spectrum upon doing. Phys Rev B 1984, 30:1023-1025.
45. Light scattering by small particles 1981, Dover Publications, Inc., Canada. H.C. van de Hulst (Ed.).
46. Mie calculations were performed using Mie scattering theory calculator, an open-source Java program, written by Prof. Scott Prahl at the Oregon Health and Science University (US) June 2013, [online]. Available from URL:. http://omlc.ogi.edu/calc/mie_calc.html.
47. Morisaku T., Watanabe J., Konno T., Takai M., Ishihara K. Hydration of phosphorylcholine groups attached to highly swollen polymer hydrogels studied by thermal analysis. Polymer 2008, 49(21):4652-4657.
48. Na L., Zhongzhou L., Shuguang X. Dynamically formed poly(vinyl alcohol) ultrafiltration membranes with good anti-fouling characteristics. JMembr Sci 2000, 169(1):17-28.
49. Gunkel G., Weinhart M., Becherer T., Haag R., Huck W.T.S. Effect of polymer brush architecture on antibiofouling properties. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12(11):4169-4172.
50. Wang X., Xia T., Ntim S.A., Ji Z., George S., Meng H., et al. Quantitative techniques for assessing and controlling the dispersion and biological effects of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in mammalian tissue culture cells. ACS Nano 2010, 4(12):7241-7252.
51. Kim S., Oh W.K., Jeong Y.S., Hong J.Y., Cho B.R., Hahn J.S., et al. Cytotoxicity of, and innate immune response to, size-controlled polypyrrole nanoparticles in mammalian cells. Biomaterials 2011, 32(9):2342-2350.
52. Ramanaviciene A., Kausaite A., Tautkus S., Ramanavicius A. Biocompatibility of polypyrrole particles: an in-vivo study in mice. JPharm Pharmacol 2007, 59(2):311-315.
53. van Staveren H.J., Moes C.J.M., van Marle J., Prahl S.A., van Gemert M.J.C. Light scattering in intralipid-10% in the wavelength of 400-1100nm. Appl Opt 1991, 30(31):4507-4514.
54. Schmitt J.M., Knuttel A., Bonner R.F. Measurement of optical properties of biological tissues by low-coherence reflectometry. Appl Opt 1993, 32(30):6032-6042.
55. Ungureanu C., Amelink A., Rayavarapu R.G., Sterenborg H.J.C.M., Manohar S., van Leeuwen T.G. Differential pathlength spectroscopy for the quantification of optical properties of gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2010, 4(7):4081-4089.
56. Zagaynova E.V., Shirmanova M.V., Kirillin M.Y., Khlebtsov B.N., Orlova A.G., Balalaeva I.V., et al. Contrasting properties of gold nanoparticles for optical coherence tomography: phantom, invivo studies and Monte Carlo simulation. Phys Med Biol 2008, 53:4995-5009.
57. Li C., Guan G., Li S., Huang Z., Wang R.K. Evaluating elastic properties of heterogeneous soft tissue by surface acoustic wave detected by phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography. JBiomed Opt 2012, 17(5):057002.
58. Kholodnykh A.I., Petrova I.Y., Larin K.V., Motamedi M., Esenaliev R. Precision of measurement of tissue optical properties with optical coherence tomography. Appl Opt 2003, 42(16):3027-3037.
59. Cain C., Milner T., Telenkov S., Schuster K., Stockton K., Stolarski D., et al. Porcine skin thermal response to near-IR lasers using a fast infrared camera. Proc SPIE 2004, 5319:313-324.
60. Sapozhnikova V.V., Prough D., Kuranov R.V., Cicenaite I., Esenaliev R.O. Influence of osmolytes on invivo glucose monitoring using optical coherence tomography. Exp Biol Med 2006, 231(8):1323-1332.
61. Pegoraro C., MacNeil S., Battaglia G. Transdermal drug delivery: from micro to nano. Nanoscale 2012, 4(6):1881-1894.
62. Welzel J., Bruhns M., Wolff H.H. Optical coherence tomography in contact dermatitis and psoriasis. Arch Dermatol Res 2003, 295(2):50-55.
63. Ulrich M., Stockfleth E., Roewert-Huber J., Astner S. Noninvasive diagnostic tools for nonmelanoma skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 2007, 157(Suppl.2):56-58.
64. Dodson J.W. The differentiation of epidermis. I. The interrelationship of epidermis and dermis in embryonic chicken skin. JEmbryol Exp Morph 1967, 17:83.
65. Carrillo-Farga J., Torres A.P., Rodriguez A., Bizarro S.A. Adenosine triphosphatase-positive Langerhans-like cells in the epidermis of the chicken (Gallas gallus). JAnat 1991, 176:1-8.
66. Gray G.M., White R.J., Williams R.H., Yardley H.J. Lipid composition of the superficial stratum corneum cells of the epidermis. Br J Dermatol 1982, 106:59-63.
67. Kirillin M., Shirmanova M., Sirotkina M., Bugrove M., Khlebtsov B., Zagaynova E. Contrasting properties of gold nanoshells and titanium dioxide nanoparticles for optical coherence tomography imaging of skin: Monte Carlo simulations and invivo study. JBiomed Opt 2009, 14(2):021017.
68. Firdous S., Ikram M., Nawaz M., Aslam M. Measurement of an optical parameters: absorption, scattering and auto-fluorescence of skin invitro. Int J Cancer Res 2005, 1(1):10-15.