Shape curves and geodesic modelling

Biometrika

Volumn 97, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 567-584

  Kenobi, Kim ^a   Dryden, Ian L ^a   Le, Huiling ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complex Watson distribution; Curve fitting; Geodesic; Growth; Landmark; Likelihood; Non Euclidean space; Polynomial; Shape; Size

Indexed keywords

PRIMATES; RATTUS;

EID: 77955877494     PISSN: 00063444     EISSN: 14643510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asq027     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. AMARAL, G. J. A., DRYDEN, I. L. & WOOD, A. T. A. (2007). Pivotal bootstrap methods for k-sample problems in directional statistics and shape analysis. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 102, 695-707.
2. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. (1991). Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. DRYDEN, I. L. & MARDIA, K. V. (1998). Statistical Shape Analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
4. FISHER, N. I., LEWIS, T. & EMBLETON, B. J. (1987). Statistical Analysis of Spherical Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. FLETCHER, P. T., LU, C., PIZER, S. M. & JOSHI, S. C. (2004). Principal geodesic analysis for the study of nonlinear statistics of shape. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 23, 995-1005.
6. GOODALL, C. R. (1991). Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape (with discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. B 53, 285-339.
7. GOODALL, C. R. & LANGE, N. (1989). Growth curve models for correlated triangular shapes. In Proc. 21st INTERFACE Symposium. Fairfax Station: Interface Foundation, 445-454
8. GOWER, J. C. (1975). Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40, 33-50.
9. HUCKEMANN, S. & ZIEZOLD, H. (2006). Principal components analysis for Riemannian manifolds, with an application to triangular shape spaces. Adv. Appl. Prob. 38, 299-319.
10. JUPP, P. E. & KENT, J. T. (1987). Fitting smooth paths to spherical data. J. R. Statist. Soc. C 36, 34-46.
11. KENDALL, D. G. (1983). The shape of Poisson-Delaunay triangles. In Studies in Probability and Related Topics, Ed. M. C. Demetrescu and M. Iosifescu, pp. 321-330 Montreal: Nagard.
12. KENDALL, D. G. (1984). Shape manifolds, Procrustean metrics and complex projective spaces. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 16, 81-121.
13. KENDALL, D. G. (1989). A survey of the statistical theory of shape. Statist. Sci. 4, 87-120.
14. KENDALL, D. G., BARDEN, D., CARNE, T. K. & LE, H. (1999). Shape and Shape Theory. Chichester: Wiley.
15. KENT, J. T. & MARDIA, K. V. (2001). Shape, tangent projections and bilateral symmetry. Biometrika 469-485
16. KENT, J. T., MARDIA, K. V., MORRIS, R. J. & AYKROYD, R. G. (2001). Functional models of growth for landmark data. In Proceedings in Functional and Spatial Data Analysis, Ed. K. V. Mardia and R. G. Aykroyd, pp. 109-115 LASR2001. Leeds: University of Leeds.
17. KUME, A., DRYDEN, I. L. & LE, H. (2007). Shape space smoothing splines for planar landmark data. Biometrika 94, 513-528
18. LE, H. & KUME, A. (2000). Detection of shape changes in biological features. J. Microsc. 200, 140-147
19. LE, H.-L. (1991). On geodesics in Euclidean shape spaces. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 44, 360-372
20. MARDIA, K. V. & DRYDEN, I. L. (1999). The complex Watson distribution and shape analysis. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 61, 913-926
21. MARDIA, K. V. & JUPP, P. E. (2000). Directional Statistics.Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Chichester:Wiley.
22. MARDIA, K. V., KENT, J. T. & BIBBY, J. M. (1979). Multivariate Analysis. London: Academic Press.
23. MONTEIRO, L. R. (1999). Multivariate regression models and geometric morphometrics: the search for causal factors in the analysis of shape. Syst. Biol. 48, 192-199.
24. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM (2010). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. URL http://www.R-project.org.
25. WILKS, S. S. (1938). The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. Ann. Math. Statist. 9, 60-62