SMFM adopts GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) for clinical guidelines

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 209, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 163-165

  Chauhan, Suneet P ^a   Blackwell, Sean C ^a  

^a Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD SAMPLING; EDITORIAL; EVALUATION; FETAL BLOOD SAMPLING; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM;

CORDOCENTESIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84883147675     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: 10976868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.012     Document Type: Editorial

References (17)

1. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine S.M. Berry, J. Stone, M. Norton, M. Johnson, and V. Berghella SMFM Clinical Guideline: fetal blood sampling Am J Obstet Gynecol 209 2013 170-80
2. G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, G. Vist for the GRADE Working Group Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations BMJ 336 2008 924 926
3. G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, and R. Kunz GRADE guidelines, 2: framing the question and deciding on important outcomes J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 395 400
4. H. Balshem, M. Helfand, and H.J. Schünemann GRADE guidelines, 3: rating the quality of evidence J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 401 406
5. G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, and G. Vist GRADE guidelines, 4: rating the quality of evidence-study limitations (risk of bias) J Clin Epidemiol 64 2001 407 415
6. G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, and V. Montori GRADE guidelines, 5: rating the quality of evidence-publication bias J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 1277 1282
7. G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, and R. Kunz GRADE guidelines, 6: rating the quality of evidence-imprecision J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 1283 1293
8. G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, R. Kunz GRADE Working Group GRADE guidelines, 7: rating the quality of evidence-inconsistency J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 1294 1302
9. G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, R. Kunz GRADE Working Group GRADE guidelines, 8: rating the quality of evidence-indirectness J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 1303 1310
10. G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, S. Sultan GRADE Working Group GRADE guidelines, 9: rating up the quality of evidence J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 1311 1316
11. M. Bruneti, I. Shemilt, and S. Pregno GRADE guidelines, 10: considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence J Clin Epidemiol 66 2013 140 150
12. G. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, and S. Sultan GRADE guidelines, 11: making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes J Clin Epidemiol 66 2013 151 157
13. G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, and N. Santesso GRADE guidelines, 12: preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes J Clin Epidemiol 66 2013 158 172
14. G.H. Guyatt, K. Thorlund, and A.D. Oxman GRADE guidelines, 13: preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes J Clin Epidemiol 66 2013 173 183
15. J. Andrews, G. Guyatt, and A.D. Oxman GRADE guidelines, 14: going from evidence to recommendations; the significance and presentation of recommendations J Clin Epidemiol 66 2013 719 725
16. J.C. Andrews, H.J. Schünemann, and A.D. Oxman GRADE guidelines, 15: going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength J Clin Epidemiol 66 2013 726 735
17. UpToDate, grading guide http://www.uptodate.com/home/grading- guide#GradingRecommendations. Accessed March 8, 2013.