Can trans-anal reinforcing sutures after double stapling in lower anterior resection reduce the need for a temporary diverting ostomy?

World Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 19, Issue 32, 2013, Pages 5309-5313

  Baek, Se Jin ^a   Kim, Jin ^a   Kwak, Jungmyun ^a   Kim, Seon Hahn ^a  

^a Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Anastomotic leak; Double stapled anastomotic technique; Low anterior resection; Rectal neoplasms; Reinforcement sutures

Indexed keywords

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE STAPLED ANASTOMOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; INCIDENCE; MALE; RECTUM ANTERIOR RESECTION; RECTUM CANCER; STOMA; TRANS ANAL REINFORCING SUTURE; ANAL CANAL; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURING METHOD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTORS; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84882985986     PISSN: 10079327     EISSN: 22192840     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i32.5309     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ, Sinclair G, Dent OF, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL. Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 1261-1266 [PMID: 14515297 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4219]
2. Jung SH, Yu CS, Choi PW, Kim DD, Park IJ, Kim HC, Kim JC. Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 902-908 [PMID: 18408971 DOI: 10.1007/s10350-008-9272-x]
3. Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1157-1168 [PMID: 11531861 DOI: 10.1046/ j.0007-1323.2001.01829.x]
4. Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC. Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 400-404 [PMID: 11260107 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01719.x]
5. Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Gregoire R, Burpee SE, Poulin EC. Could laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery become the standard of care? A review and experience with 750 procedures. Can J Surg 2003; 46: 432-440 [PMID: 14680350]
6. Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Andersson M, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 2004; 6: 462-469 [PMID; 15521937 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00657.x]
7. Goriainov V, Miles AJ. Anastomotic leak rate and outcome for laparoscopic intra-corporeal stapled anastomosis. J Minim Access Surg 2008; 4: 39-43 [PMID: 19547680 DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.41942]
8. McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 1150-1154 [PMID: 16035134 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5054]
9. Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 2000; 179: 92-96 [PMID: 10773140 DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00252-X]
10. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, van de Velde CJ. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 211-216 [PMID: 15584062 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4806]
11. Alberts JC, Parvaiz A, Moran BJ. Predicting risk and diminishing the consequences of anastomotic dehiscence following rectal resection. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5: 478-482 [PMID; 12925084 DOI: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00515.x]
12. Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY, Chen JS, Chen HH, Chiang JM, Tang R. Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 9-13 [PMID: 15621985]
13. Isbister WH. Anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a single surgeon's experience. ANZ J Surg 2001; 71: 516-520 [PMID; 11527260 DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02189.x]
14. Collopy BT. Colorectal anastomotic leak rates are measures of technical skill in surgery. ANZ J Surg 2001; 71: 508-510 [PMID: 11527258]
15. Griffen FD, Knight CD, Whitaker JM, Knight CD. The double stapling technique for low anterior resection. Results, modifications, and observations. Ann Surg 1990; 211: 745-51; discussion 751-2 [PMID: 2357137 DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199 006000-00014]
16. Knight CD, Griffen FD. An improved technique for low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapler. Surgery 1980; 88: 710-714 [PMID: 7434211]
17. Baran JJ, Goldstein SD, Resnik AM. The double-staple technique in colorectal anastomoses: a critical review. Am Surg 1992; 58: 270-272 [PMID: 1586088]
18. Marecik SJ, Chaudhry V, Pearl R, Park JJ, Prasad LM. Singlestapled double-pursestring anastomosis after anterior resection of the rectum. Am J Surg 2007; 193: 395-399 [PMID; 17320542 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.12.008]
19. Gadiot RP, Dunker MS, Mearadji A, Mannaerts GH. Reduction of anastomotic failure in laparoscopic colorectal surgery using antitraction sutures. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 68-71 [PMID; 20661752 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1131-x]
20. Portillo G, Franklin ME. Clinical results using bioabsorbable staple-line reinforcement for circular stapler in colorectal surgery: a multicenter study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010; 20: 323-327 [PMID: 20465429 DOI: 10.1089/ lap.2009.0201]
21. Moore JW, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL. Morbidity and mortality after single-and double-stapled colorectal anastomoses in patients with carcinoma of the rectum. Aust N Z J Surg 1996; 66: 820-823 [PMID: 8996062]
22. Mukai M, Fukasawa M, Kishima K, Iizuka S, Fukumitsu H, Yazawa N, Tajima T, Nakamura M, Makuuchi H. Trans-anal reinforcing sutures after double stapling for lower rectal cancer: report of two cases. Oncol Rep 2009; 21: 335-339 [PMID; 19148504 DOI: 10.3892/or_00000226]
23. Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ, Mehanna D, Dent OF, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL. Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 255-259 [PMID; 15273549 DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133186.81222.08]
24. Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J, Haffner J, Wiig JN. Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7: 51-57 [PMID: 15606585 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00700. x]
25. Thalheimer A, Bueter M, Kortuem M, Thiede A, Meyer D. Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomy in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 1011-1017 [PMID; 16598401 DOI: 10.1007/s10350-006-0541-2]
26. Mala T, Nesbakken A. Morbidity related to the use of a protective stoma in anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10: 785-788 [PMID: 18190612 DOI: 10.1111/ j.1463-1318.2007.01456.x]
27. Giannakopoulos GF, Veenhof AA, van der Peet DL, Sietses C, Meijerink WJ, Cuesta MA. Morbidity and complications of protective loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11: 609-612 [PMID: 19175642 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01690.x]
28. Tsunoda A, Tsunoda Y, Narita K, Watanabe M, Nakao K, Kusano M. Quality of life after low anterior resection and temporary loop ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 218-222 [PMID: 18172730 DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9101-7]