Scale refinement and initial evaluation of a behavioral health function measurement tool for work disability evaluation

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 94, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1679-1686

  Marfeo, Elizabeth E ^a   Ni, Pengsheng ^a   Haley, Stephen M ^a   Bogusz, Kara ^a   Meterko, Mark ^a   McDonough, Christine M ^a,b   Chan, Leighton ^c   Rasch, Elizabeth K ^c   Brandt, Diane E ^c   Jette, Alan M ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Disability evaluation; Outcome assessment (health care); Rehabilitation; United States Social Security Administration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EMOTION; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOOD; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIABILITY; SELF CONCEPT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SIMULATION; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL SECURITY; SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION BEHAVIORAL HEALTH FUNCTION INSTRUMENT; TREATMENT RESPONSE; WORK DISABILITY;

EID: 84882920901     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: 1532821X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.012     Document Type: Note

References (34)

1. Social Security Administration Annual Statistical Report on the Social Security Disability Insurance Program, 2011 2012 Social Security Administration Washington (DC) Report No. 13-11827
2. Social Security Advisory Board Disability Roundtable. A disability system for the 21st century. Available at: http://www.ssab.gov/documents/disability- system-21st.pdf. Accessed April 5, 2013.
3. Committee on Improving the Disability Decision Process SSA's listing of impairments and agency access to medical expertise. Summary J.D. Stobo, M. McGeary, D.K. Barnes, Improving the social security disability decision process 2007 The National Academies Pr Washington (DC)
4. D.E. Brandt, A.J. Houtenville, M. Huynh, L. Chan, and E.K. Rasch Connecting contemporary paradigms to Social Security Administration's disability evaluation process Journal of Disability Policy Studies 20 2011 1 13
5. W.A. Anthony, E.S. Rogers, M. Cohen, and R.R. Davies Relationships between psychiatric symptomatology, work skills, and future vocational performance Psychiatr Serv 46 1995 353 358
6. K. MacDonald-Wilson, E.S. Rogers, and W.A. Anthony Unique issues in assessing work function among individuals with psychiatric disabilities J Occup Rehabil 11 2001 217 232
7. S. Bilder, and D. Mechanic Navigating the disability process: persons with mental disorders applying for and receiving disability benefits Milbank Q 81 2003 75 106
8. Social Security Administration Administrative review process for adjudicating initial disability claims. Final rule Fed Regist 71 2006 16423 16462
9. Committee on Improving the Disability Decision Process SSA's listing of impairments and agency access to medical expertise. 7 findings and recommendations J.D. Stobo, M. McGeary, D.K. Barnes, Improving the Social Security disability decision process 2007 National Academies Pr Washington (DC)
10. A.M. Jette, D.S. Tulsky, and P. Ni Development and initial evaluation of the spinal cord injury-functional index Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93 2012 1733 1750
11. Reeve B. Applications of item response theory (IRT) modeling for building and evaluating questionnaires measuring patient-reported outcomes. 2004. Available at: http://outcomes.cancer.gov/conference/irt/reeve.pdf. Accessed September 6, 2012.
12. E.E. Marfeo, S.M. Haley, and A.M. Jette A conceptual foundation for measures of physical function and behavioral health function for Social Security work disability evaluation Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013 In press
13. E.E. Marfeo, P. Ni, and A.M. Jette Development of an instrument to measure behavioral health function for work disability: item pool construction and factor analysis Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013 94:1670-8
14. Rivers D. Sample matching: representative sampling from internet panels. A white paper on the advantages of the sample matching methodology. YouGovPolymetrix. Available at: http://psfaculty.ucdavis.edu/bsjjones/rivers. pdf. Accessed February 10, 2010.
15. F. Samejima Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores Psychometrika (Monograph Suppl) 34 1969 100
16. M. Orlando, and D. Thissen New item fit indices for dichotomous item response theory models Appl Psychol Meas 24 2000 50 64
17. M. Orlando, and D. Thissen Further investigation of the performance of S-X2: an item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models Appl Psychol Meas 27 2003 289 298
18. T. Kang, and T. Chen Performance of the generalized S-X2 item fit index for polytomous IRT models Journal of Educational Measurement 45 2008 391 406
19. J.B. Bjorner, K.J. Smith, C. Stone, and X. Sun IRTFIT: a macro for item fit and local dependence tests under IRT models 2007 QualityMetric Lincoln
20. M.G. Jodoin, and M.J. Gierl Evaluating type I error and power rates using an effect size measure with the logistic regression procedure for DIF detection Applied Measurement in Education 14 2001 329 349
21. Y. Benjamini, and Y. Hochberg Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing J R Stat Soc. Series B (Methodological) 57 1995 289 300
22. D. Thissen, L. Steinberg, and D. Kuang Quick and easy implementation of the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure for controlling the false positive rate in multiple comparisons J Educ Behav Stat 27 2002 77 83
23. L. Steinberg, and D. Thissen Using effect sizes for research reporting: examples using item response theory to analyze differential item functioning Psychol Methods 11 2006 402 415
24. T.A. Warm Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory Psychometrika 54 1989 427 450
25. L.C. Mâsse, K.C. Heesch, K.E. Eason, and M. Wilson Evaluating the properties of a stage-specific self-efficacy scale for physical activity using classical test theory, confirmatory factor analysis and item response modeling Health Educational Research 21 2006 133 146
26. R.P. McDonald Test theory: a unified treatment 1999 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah
27. N.S. Raju, L.H. Price, T.C. Oshima, and M.L. Nering Standardized conditional SEM: a case for conditional reliability Appl Psychol Meas 31 2007 169 180
28. M.O. Edelen, and B.B. Reeve Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement Qual Life Res 16 Suppl 1 2007 5 18
29. Y. Cheng, K.H. Yuan, and C. Liu Comparison of reliability measures under factor analysis and item response theory Educ Psychol Meas 72 2012 52 67
30. D. Cella, W. Riley, and A. Stone The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008 J Clin Epidemiol 63 2010 1179 1194
31. D. Cella, S. Young, and N. Rothrock The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group during its first two years Med Care 45 5 Suppl 2007 S3 S11
32. B. Gandek, S.J. Sinclair, A.M. Jette, and J.E. Ware Jr. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC) Am J Phys Med Rehabil 86 2007 57 71
33. A.M. Jette, S.M. Haley, and W. Tao Prospective evaluation of the AM-PAC-CAT in outpatient rehabilitation settings Phys Ther 87 2007 385 398
34. S.M. Haley, P. Ni, and A.M. Jette Replenishing a computerized adaptive test of patient-reported daily activity functioning Qual Life Res 18 2009 461 471