PVQM - A perceptual video quality measure

Signal Processing: Image Communication

Volumn 17, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 781-798

  Hekstra, A P ^a   Beerends, J G ^a   Ledermann, D ^b   De Caluwe, F E ^c   Kohler, S ^b   Koenen, R H ^d   Rihs, S ^b   Ehrsam, M ^e   Schlauss, D ^b  

^a KPN RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^b Swisscom AG   (Switzerland)

^c Total E and P   (Netherlands)

^d Intertrust Technologies Corporation   (United States)

^e Sohard AG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Objective video quality measurement

Indexed keywords

BANDWIDTH; BIT ERROR RATE; CODING ERRORS; IMAGE QUALITY; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

VIDEO CODING SYSTEMS;

IMAGE CODING;

EID: 0036844611     PISSN: 09235965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0923-5965(02)00056-5     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Alpert T., Baroncini V., Choi D., Contin L., Koenen R., Pereira F., Peterson H. Subjective evaluation of MPEG-4 video codec proposals: Methodological approach and test procedures. Signal Processing: Image Communication. 9:1997;305-325.
2. J.G. Beerends, Modelling cognitive effects that play a role in the perception of speech quality, in: DEGA, ITG, EURASIP (Eds.), Speech Quality Assessment, Bochum, November 1994, pp. 1-9.
3. Beerends J.G., Stemerdink J.A. A perceptual speech quality measure based on a psychoacoustic sound representation. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 42:March 1994;115-123.
4. S. Daly, The visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity, in: A.B. Watson (Ed.), Digital Images and Human Vision, Part III, Measurement and Prediction of Visual Quality, MIT Press, London, England, 1993, Chapter 14, pp. 179-206.
5. A.P. Hekstra, J.G. Beerends, R.H. Koenen, F.E. de Caluwe, A method, an arrangement, an ASIC and their use for objective assessment of video quality, European Patent EP0940996, March 1998.
6. http://www.vqeg.org.
7. ISO-IEC, Coding of moving pictures and associated audio, International Standard 13818, 1995.
8. ITU-R, Encoding parameters of digital television for studios, Recommendation 601, 1992.
9. ITU-T, Video coding for low bit rate communication, Recommendation H.263, March 1996.
10. ITU-T Study Group 12, Review of validation tests for objective speech quality measures, Document COM 12-74, March 1996.
11. ITU-T, Objective quality measurement of telephone-band (300-3400 Hz) speech codecs, Recommendation P.861, August 1996.
12. ITU-T Study Group 12, Final report from VQEG on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment, Geneva, Temporary Document 8 (WP2/12), May 2000.
13. Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ), an objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrowband telephone networks and speech codecs, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland, February 2001.
14. S. Lubin, The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance, in: A.B. Watson (Ed.), Digital Images and Human Vision, Part III, Measurement and Prediction of Visual Quality, MIT Press, London, England, 1993, Chapter 13, pp. 161-178.
15. MPEG AOE Group, MPEG-4 testing and evaluation procedures document, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, Document N999, Tokyo MPEG Meeting, July 1995.
16. L.A. Olzak, J.P. Thomas, Seeing spatial patterns, in: L. Kaufman, K.R. Boff, J.P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Section II, Basic Sensory processes I, Wiley, New York, 1986, Chapter 7.
17. A.W. Rix, M.P. Hollier, The perceptual analysis measurement system for robust end-to-end speech quality assessment, IEEE ICASSP, June 2000.