Bladder tissue regeneration using acellular bi-layer silk scaffolds in alarge animal model of augmentation cystoplasty

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 34, 2013, Pages 8681-8689

  Tu, Duong D ^a,b   Chung, Yeun Goo ^a   Gil, Eun Seok ^c   Seth, Abhishek ^a,b   Franck, Debra ^a   Cristofaro, Vivian ^b,d,e   Sullivan, Maryrose P ^b,d,e   Di Vizio, Dolores ^a,b,f   Gomez, Pablo ^a,b   Adam, Rosalyn M ^a,b   Kaplan, David L ^c   Estrada, Carlos R ^a,b   Mauney, Joshua R ^a,b  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c Tufts University   (United States)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Bladder; Silk; Tissue engineering; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

BLADDER; BOMBYX MORI SILK FIBROIN; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; SMOOTH MUSCLE REGENERATIONS; SUPPORT REGENERATIONS; ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH; VASCULARIZATION PROCESS; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; COMPLIANCE CONTROL; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; HISTOLOGY; MUSCLE; PROTEINS; REPAIR; SILK; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE REGENERATION;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

ACELLULAR BILAYER SILK SCAFFOLD; CYTOKERATIN; PROTEIN P63; SILK; SILK FIBROIN; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SOLVENT; SYNAPTOPHYSIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UROPLAKIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLADDER; BLADDER CAPACITY; BLADDER COMPLIANCE; BLADDER RECONSTRUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; EX VIVO STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMPLANTATION; LEACHING; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SMOOTH MUSCLE; SURVIVAL; SWINE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE REGENERATION; UROTHELIUM; VASCULARIZATION;

ANIMALIA; BOMBYX MORI; SUIDAE; SUS;

BLADDER; SILK; TISSUE ENGINEERING; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BOMBYX; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FEMALE; FIBROINS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SMOOTH; REGENERATION; SWINE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; URINARY BLADDER; URODYNAMICS; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; UROTHELIUM;

EID: 84882857243     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Guys J.M., Hery G., Haddad M., Borrionne C. Neurogenic bladder in children: basic principles, new therapeutic trends. Scand J Surg 2011, 100:256-263.
2. Biers S.M., Venn S.N., Greenwell T.J. The past, present and future of augmentation cystoplasty. BJU Int 2012, 109:1280-1293.
3. Scales C.D., Wiener J.S. Evaluating outcomes of enterocystoplasty in patients with spina bifida: a review of the literature. JUrol 2008, 180:2323-2329.
4. Husmann D.A., Rathbun S.R. Long-term follow up of enteric bladder augmentations: the risk for malignancy. JPediatr Urol 2008, 4:381-385.
5. Atala A., Bauer S.B., Soker S., Yoo J.J., Retik A.B. Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty. Lancet 2006, 367:1241-1246.
6. Caione P., Boldrini R., Salerno A., Nappo S.G. Bladder augmentation using acellular collagen biomatrix: a pilot experience in exstrophic patients. Pediatr Surg Int 2012, 28:421-428.
7. Kropp B.P., Zwischenberger J.B. Tissue-engineered autologous bladders: new possibilities for cystoplasty. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2006, 3:588-589.
8. Yoo J.J., Meng J., Oberpenning F., Atala A. Bladder augmentation using allogenic bladder submucosa seeded with cells. Urology 1998, 51:221-225.
9. Oberpenning F., Meng J., Yoo J.J., Atala A. De novo reconstitution of a functional mammalian urinary bladder by tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol 1999, 17:149-155.
10. Lai J.Y., Chang P.Y., Lin J.N. Bladder autoaugmentation using various biodegradable scaffolds seeded with autologous smooth muscle cells in a rabbit model. JPediatr Surg 2005, 40:1869-1873.
11. Flieger A., Golka K., Schulze H., Follmann W. Primary cultures of human urothelial cells for genotoxicity testing. JToxicol Environ Health A 2008, 71:930-935.
12. Chamley-Campbell J., Campbell G.R., Ross R. The smooth muscle cell in culture. Physiol Rev 1979, 59:1-61.
13. Hipp J.A., Hipp J.D., Yoo J.J., Atala A., Andersson K.E. Microarray analysis of bladder smooth muscle from patients with myelomeningocele. BJU Int 2008, 102:741-746.
14. Subramaniam R., Hinley J., Stahlschmidt J., Southgate J. Tissue engineering potential of urothelial cells from diseased bladders. JUrol 2011, 186:2014-2020.
15. Bolin S.R., Matthews P.J., Ridpath J.F. Methods for detection and frequency of contamination of fetal calf serum with bovine viral diarrhea virus and antibodies against bovine viral diarrhea virus. JVet Diagn Invest 1991, 3:199-203.
16. Kim U.J., Park J., Kim H.J., Wada M., Kaplan D.L. Three-dimensional aqueous-derived biomaterial scaffolds from silk fibroin. Biomaterials 2005, 26:2775-2785.
17. Altman G.H., Diaz F., Jakuba C., Calabro T., Horan R.L., Chen J., et al. Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials 2003, 24:401-416.
18. Wang Y., Rudym D.D., Walsh A., Abrahamsen L., Kim H.J., Kim Hs, et al. Invivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds. Biomaterials 2008, 29:3415-3428.
19. Mauney J.R., Cannon G.M., Lovett M.L., Gong E.M., Di Vizio D., Gomez P., et al. Evaluation of gel spun silk-based biomaterials in a murine model of bladder augmentation. Biomaterials 2011, 32:808-818.
20. Seth A., Chung Y.G., Gil E.S., Tu D., Franck D., Di Vizio D., et al. The performance of silk scaffolds in a rat model of augmentation cystoplasty. Biomaterials 2013, 34:4758-4765.
21. Kang I.S., Lee J.W., Seo I.Y. Robot-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty: a case report. Int Neurourol J 2010, 14:61-64.
22. Merguerian P.A., Reddy P.P., Barrieras D.J., Wilson G.J., Woodhouse K., Bagli D.J., et al. Acellular bladder matrix allografts in the regeneration of functional bladders: evaluation of large-segment (>24cm) substitution in a porcine model. BJU Int 2000, 85:894-898.
23. Clementson Kockum C., Willén R., Malmfors G. Bladder augmentation with different forms of intestinal grafts: an experimental study in the pig. BJU Int 1999, 83:305-311.
24. Gomez P., Gil E.S., Lovett M.L., Rockwood D.N., Di Vizio D., Kaplan D.L., et al. The effect of manipulation of silk scaffold fabrication parameters on matrix performance in a murine model of bladder augmentation. Biomaterials 2011, 32:7562-7570.
25. Seth A., Chung Y.G., Kim D., Ramachandran A., Cristofaro V., Gomez P., et al. The impact of discrete modes of spinal cord injury on bladder muscle contractility. BMC Urol 2013, 13:24.
26. Wahl E.F., Lerman S.E., Lahdes-Vasama T.T., Churchill B.M. Measurement of bladder compliance can be standardized by a dimensionless number: theoretical perspective. BJU Int 2004, 94:8957.
27. Schaefer M., Kaiser A., Stehr M., Beyer H.J. Bladder augmentation with small intestinal submucosa leads to unsatisfactory long-term results. JPediatr Urol 2013, [Epub ahead of print].
28. Shang K., Rnjak-Kovacina J., Lin Y., Hayden R.S., Tao H., Kaplan D.L. Accelerated invitro degradation of optically clear low beta-sheet silk films by enzyme-mediated pretreatment. Trans Vis Sci Tech 2013, 2:2.
29. de Boer W.I., Schuller A.G., Vermey M., van der Kwast T.H. Expression of growth factors and receptors during specific phases in regenerating urothelium after acute injury invivo. Am J Pathol 1994, 145:1199-1207.
30. Kong X.T., Dend F.M., Hu P., Liang F.X., Zhou G., Auerback A.B., et al. Roles of uroplakins in plaque formation, umbrella cell enlargement, and urinary tract diseases. JCell Biol 2004, 167:1195-1204.
31. 2+ in carbachol-induced tonic contraction of the pig detrusor smooth muscle. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 1994, 350:398-402.
32. Hawthorn M.H., Chapple C.R., Cock M., Chess-Williams R. Urothelium-derived inhibitory factor(s) influences on detrusor muscle contractility invitro. Br J Pharmacol 2000, 129:416-419.
33. Brading A.F., Mostwin J.L. Electrical and mechanical responses of guinea-pig bladder muscle to nerve stimulation. Br J Pharmacol 1989, 98:1083-1090.