The structure of joint leisure trips: Analyzing two-person leisure trips of Dutch students

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 31, Issue , 2013, Pages 216-225

  Ettema, Dick ^a   Zwartbol, Danielle ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Social network links; Social recreational travel; Spatial context; Students

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; SOCIAL NETWORK; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84882841626     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Axhausen K.W. Social networks, mobility biographies, and travel: survey challenges. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2008, 35:981-996.
2. Bhat C.R., Lockwood A. On distinguishing between physically active and physically passive episodes and between travel and activity episodes: an analysis of weekend recreational participation in the San Francisco Bay area. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2004, 38:573-592.
3. Carrasco J.-A., Miller E.J. Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: a social network approach. Transportation 2006, 33:463-480.
4. Carrasco J.-A., Miller E.J. The social dimension in action: a multilevel, personal networks model of social activity frequency between individuals. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2009, 43:90-104.
5. Cools M., Moons E., Wets G. Assessing the impact of public holidays on travel time expenditure: differentiation by trip motive. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2010, 2157:29-37.
6. Ettema D., Schwanen T. A relational approach to analysing leisure travel. Journal of Transport Geography 2012, 24:173-181.
7. Farber S., Páez A. My car, my friends, and me: a preliminary analysis of automobility and social activity participation. Journal of Transport Geography 2009, 17:216-225.
8. Ginsberg Y. Joint leisure activities and social networks in two neighborhoods in Tel Aviv. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1975, 37:668-676.
9. Hägerstrand T. What about people in regional science?. Papers in Regional Science 1970, 24:7-21.
10. Harms L. Overwegend Onderweg [Mostly Mobile] 2008, SCP, The Hague.
11. Kemperman A.D.A.M., Borgers A.W.J., Oppewal H., Timmermans H.J.P. Consumer choice of theme parks: a conjoint choice model of seasonality effects and variety seeking behaviour. Leisure Sciences 2000, 22:1-18.
12. Kwak N., Campbell S. Mobile communication and social capital: an analysis of geographically differentiated usage patterns. New Media and Society 2010, 12:435-451.
13. Limtanakool N., Dijst M., Schwanen T. The influence of socioeconomic characteristics, land use and travel time considerations on mode choice for medium- and longer-distance trips. Journal of Transport Geography 2006, 14:327-341.
14. Mok D., Wellman B., Basu R. Did distance matter before the Internet? Interpersonal contact and support in the 1970s. Social Networks 2007, 29:430-461.
15. Neutens T., Schwanen T., Miller H. Dealing with preferences, privileges and timing in opportunities for joint activity participation. Geographical Analysis 2010, 42:245-266.
16. Ohnmacht T., Götz K., Schad H. Leisure mobility styles in Swiss conurbations: construction and empirical analysis. Transportation 2009, 36:243-265.
17. Ren F., Kwan M.-P. The impact of the Internet on human activity-travel patterns: analysis of gender differences using multi-group structural equation models. Journal of Transport Geography 2009, 17:440-450.
18. Schad H., Ohnmacht T., Götz K. Leisure mobility styles in Swiss conurbations: construction and empirical analysis. Transportation 2009, 36:243-265.
19. Scheiner J. Does the car make elderly people happy and mobile? Settlement structures, car availability and leisure mobility of the elderly. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 2006, 6:151-172.
20. Schlich R., Schönfelder S., Hanson S., Axhausen K.W. Structures of leisure travel: temporal and spatial variability. Transport Reviews 2004, 34:219-237.
21. Sener I.N., Copperman R.B., Pendyala R.M., Bhat C.R. An analysis of children's leisure activity engagement: examining the day of week, location, physical activity level, and fixity dimensions. Transportation 2008, 35:673-696.
22. Sharmeen, F., Ettema, D., 2010. Whom to Hang Out With and Where? Analysis of the Influence of Spatial Setting on the Choice of Activity Company. Paper Presented at the 12th WCTR Conference, 11-15 July, 2010, Lisbon, Portugal.
23. Silvis, J., Niemeier, D., D'Souza, R., 2006. Social Networks and Travel Behavior: Report from an Integrated Travel Diary. Paper Presented in the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto, Japan.
24. Stauffacher, M., Schlich, R., Axhausen, K.W., Scholz, R.W., 2005. The Diversity of Travel Behaviour: Motives and Social Interactions in Leisure Time Activities. (accessed 07.10.10). http://e-collection.ethbib.ethz.ch/eserv/eth:28934/eth-28934-01.pdf.
25. Tarigan A.M., Kitamura R. Week-to-week leisure trip frequency and its variability. Transportation Research Record 2009, 2135:43-51.
26. Tillema, T., Dijst, M., 2007. Electronic and Face-to-Face Communication in Maintaining Social Relationships. Paper Presented in Workshop Frontiers in Transportation 2007, Amsterdam.
27. Wheeler J.O., Stutz F.P. Spatial dimensions of urban social travel. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1971, 61:371-386.