Treatment may influence self-report and jeopardize our understanding of outcome

Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

Volumn 74, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 770-776

  Nirenberg, Ted ^a,b,c   Longabaugh, Richard ^b   Baird, Janette ^a,c   Mello, Michael J ^a,c  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MANDATORY PROGRAM; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF REPORT; STATISTICAL BIAS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOL-RELATED DISORDERS; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDATORY PROGRAMS; MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; RISK-TAKING; SELF REPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRUTH DISCLOSURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84882772178     PISSN: 19371888     EISSN: 19384114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2013.74.770     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1990). Invalidity of true experiments: Selfreport pretest biases. Evaluation Review, 14, 374-390.
2. Babor, T. F., Steinberg, K., Anton, R., & Del Boca, F. (2000). Talk is cheap: Measuring drinking outcomes in clinical trials. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 55-63.
3. Babor, T. F., Stephens, R. S., & Marlatt, G. A. (1987). Verbal report methods in clinical research on alcoholism: Response bias and its minimization. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 48, 410-423.
4. Baird, J., Longabaugh, R., Lee, C. S., Nirenberg, T. D., Woolard, R., Mello, M. J., Gogineni, A. (2007). Treatment completion in a brief motiva-tional intervention in the emergency department: The effect of multiple interventions and therapists' behavior. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 31, Supplement s3, 71s-75s.
5. Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16, 252-260.
6. Brener, N. D., Billy, J. O. G., & Grady, W. R. (2003). Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: Evidence from the scientific literature. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 436-457.
7. Daeppen, J. B., Yersin, B., Landry, U., Pécoud, A., & Decrey, H. (2000). Reliability and validity of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) imbedded within a general health risk screening questionnaire: Results of a survey in 332 primary care patients. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 659-665.
8. Del Boca, F. K., & Darkes, J. (2003). The validity of self-reports of alcohol consumption: State of the science and challenges for research. Addiction, 98, Supplement s2, 1-12.
9. Donovan, J. E. (2009). Estimated blood alcohol concentrations for child and adolescent drinking and their implications for screening instruments. Pediatrics, 123, e975-e981.
10. Fleming, M. F., Barry, K. L., & MacDonald, R. (1991). The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in a college sample. International Journal of the Addictions, 26, 1173-1185.
11. Howard, G. S. (1980). Response-shift bias: A problem in evaluating interventions with pre/post self-reports. Evaluation Review, 4, 93-106.
12. Karno, M., Granholm, E., & Lin, A. (2000). Factor structure of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in a mental health clinic sample. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 751-758.
13. MacKenzie, K. R. (1983). The clinical application of group climate measure. In R. R. Dies and K. R. MacKenzie (Eds.), Advances in group psychotherapy: Integrating research and practice (pp. 159-170). New York, NY: International Universities Press.
14. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. McNally, A. M., Palfai, T. P., & Kahler, C. W. (2005). Motivational inter-
15. ventions for heavy drinking college students: Examining the role of discrepancy-related psychological processes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 79-87.
16. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17. Nirenberg, T., Baird, J., Longabaugh, R., & Mello, M. J. (2013). Motivational counseling reduces future police charges in court referred youth. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 53, 89-99.
18. Ogrodniczuk, J. S., & Piper, W. E. (2003). The effect of group climate on outcome in two forms of short-term group therapy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 64-76.
19. Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption-II. Addiction, 88, 791-804.
20. Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1992). Timeline follow-back: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In R. Litten & J. Allen (Eds.), Measuring alcohol consumption. New York, NY: Humana Press.