À la recherche du temps perdu: Extracting temporal relations from medical text in the 2012 i2b2 NLP challenge

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 843-848

  Cherry, Colin ^a   Zhu, Xiaodan ^a   Martin, Joel ^a   de Bruijn, Berry ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; DATA EXTRACTION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MACHINE LEARNING; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PREDICTION; SEMANTICS; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TIME; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PROCEDURES; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TEXT; INFORMATION EXTRACTION; METHODOLOGY; RELATION EXTRACTION; TEMPORAL REASONING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PATIENT DISCHARGE SUMMARIES; TIME; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

CLINICAL TEXT; INFORMATION EXTRACTION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; RELATION EXTRACTION; TEMPORAL REASONING;

EID: 84882748440     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001624     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Verhagen M, Gaizauskas R, Schilder F, et al. SemEval-2007 task 15: Tempeval temporal relation identification. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2007); June 2007, Prague, Czech Republic: Stroudsburg, PA: Assoc for Computational Linguistics, 2007:75-80. doi:10.3115/1621474.1621488
2. Zhou L, Hripcsak G. Temporal reasoning with medical data-a review with emphasis on medical natural language processing. J Biomed Inform 2007;40:183-202.
3. Sun W, Rumshisky A, Uzuner O. Evaluating temporal relations in clinical text: 2012 i2b2 challenge overview. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:806-13.
4. Mani I, Verhagen M, Wellner B, et al. Machine learning of temporal relations. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006:753-60.
5. de Bruijn B, Cherry C, Kiritchenko S, et al. Machine-learned solutions for three stages of clinical information extraction: the state of the art at i2b2 2010. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:557-62.
6. Aronson AR, Lang FM. An overview of MetaMap: historical perspective and recent advances. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:229-36.
7. UzZaman N, Allen J. Temporal evaluation. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Portland, OR. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011:351-6.
8. Vilain M, Kautz H. Constraint propagation algorithms for temporal reasoning. The Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-86); Los Altos, CA: Philadelphia, PA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1986:377-82.
9. Floyd RW. Algorithm 97: shortest path. Commun ACM 1962;5:345.
10. Aho A, Garey M, Ullman J. The transitive reduction of a directed graph. SIAM J Comput 1972;1:131-7.
11. Berger A, Pietra V, Pietra S. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational Linguistics 1996;22:39-71.
12. http://opennlp.sourceforge.net/projects.html (updated Sep 23, 2010; accessed 12 July 2012).
13. Charniak E, Johnson M. Coarse-to-fine n-best parsing and MaxEnt discriminative reranking. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005:173-80. doi:10.3115/1219840.1219862
14. McClosky D, Charniak E, Johnson M. Effective self-training for parsing. In: Proceedings of Human Language Technology conference / North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Annual Meeting. New York, NY, USA. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006:152-9. doi:10.3115/1220835.1220855
15. de Marneffe MC, MacCartney B, Manning CD. Generating Typed Dependency Parses from Phrase Structure Parses. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Genoa, Italy. Paris, France: European Language Resources Association, 2006;449-54.
16. National Library of Medicine. UMLS. Bethesda, MD: U.S. National Library of Medicine http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/about_umls.html (updated Aug 29, 2011; accessed 27 Jun 2012).
17. Roberts K, Rink B, Harabagiu S. Extraction of Medical Concepts, Assertions, and Relations from Discharge Summaries for the Fourth i2b2/VA Shared Task Fourth i2b2/VA Shared-Task and Workshop Challenges in Natural Language Processing for Clinical Data, Washington, DC, 2010. Boston, MA: Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2).
18. Fan R-E, Chang K-W, Hsieh C-J, et al. LIBLINEAR: a library for large linear classification. J Mach Learn Res 2008;9:1871-74.