A less conservative method to adjust for familywise error rate in neuropsychological research: The Holm's sequential Bonferroni procedure

NeuroRehabilitation

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 693-696

  Eichstaedt, Katie E ^a   Kovatch, Keith ^a   Maroof, David Aaron ^b  

^a Argosy University   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Bonferroni; Holm's sequential; neuropsychology; Type I error

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BONFERRONI PROCEDURE; COGNITION; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; HOLM SEQUENTIAL PROCEDURE; LANGUAGE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NULL HYPOTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COGNITION; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RESEARCH;

EID: 84882679489     PISSN: 10538135     EISSN: 18786448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-130893     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abdi, H. (2010). Holm's sequential Bonferroni procedure, In Neil Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Research Design. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
2. Aickin, M.,&Gensler,H. (1996). Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: The Bonferroni vs Holm methods. American Journal of Public Health, 86(5), 726-728.
3. Aschengrau, A., & Seage, G. R. (2008). Random error. Essentials of Epidemiology in Public Health. Jones and Bartlett Publishers: Burlington, 307-342.
4. Blakesley, R. E., Mazumdar, S., Dew, M. A., Houck, P. R., Tang, G., Renolds, C. F.,&Butters, M. A. (2009). Comparisons of methods for multiple hypothesis testing in neuropsychological research. Neuropsychology, 23(2), 255-264.
5. Brandt, J. (2007). 2005 INS presidential address: Neuropsychological crimes and misdemeanors. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21(4), 553-568. Doi: 10.1080/13854040600770800
6. Castaneda, M. B., Levin, J. R., & Dunham, R. B. (1993). Using planned comparisons in management research: A case for the bonferroni procedure. Journal of Management, 19(3), 707-724.
7. Grasman, R. P. P. P., Huizenga, H. M.,Weeda,W. D.,&Waldorp, L. J. (2009). Data split-half roi selection, Bonferroni correction, and statistical power. Neuroimage, 47(1), 76. Doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70539-7
8. Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75(4), 800-802.
9. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65-70.
10. Klockars, A. J., Hancock, G. R., & McAweeney, M. J. (1995). Power of unweighted and weighted versions of simultaneous and sequential multiple-comparison procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 118(2), 300-307. Doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.300
11. Levin, B. (1996). Annotation: On the Holm, Simes, and Hochberg multiple test procedures. American Journal of Public Health, 86(5), 628-629.
12. Lix, L. M., & Sajobi, T. (2010). Testing multiple outcomes in repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 268-280. Doi:10.1037/a0017737
13. Perneger, T. V. (1998). What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ, 316, 1238-1240.
14. Sankoh, A. J., Huque, M. F., & Dubey, S. D. (1997). Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 16(22), 2529-2542.
15. Sarkar, S. K., Guo, W. & Finner, H. (2012). On adaptive procedures controlling the familywise error rate. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 142(1), 65-78. Doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2011.06.022
16. Silverstein, A. B. (1986) Statistical power lost and statistical power regained: The Bonferroni procedure in exploratory research. Education and Psychological Measurement, 46(2), 303-307. Doi: 10.1177/001316448604600202
17. Rothman, K. J. (1990). No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology, 1(1), 43-46.