Enhancing inhibition: How impulsivity and emotional activation interact with different implementation intentions

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 144, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 291-297

  Burkard, Christina ^a   Rochat, Lucien ^a   Van der Linden, Martial ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Emotional activation; Implementation intentions; Inhibition; Urgency

Indexed keywords

2300; 2340; 2360; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTION; EMOTIONAL ACTIVATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLEMENTATION INTENTIONS; IMPULSIVENESS; INHIBITION; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; URGENCY; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

2300; 2340; 2360; EMOTIONAL ACTIVATION; IMPLEMENTATION INTENTIONS; INHIBITION; URGENCY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CUES; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMPULSIVE BEHAVIOR; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); INTENTION; MALE; VISION, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84882663268     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adriaanse M.A., Ridder D.T.D., de Wit J.B.F. Finding the critical cue: Implementation intentions to change one's diet work best when tailored to personally relevant reasons for unhealthy eating. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2009, 35:60-71.
2. Adriaanse M.A., Van Oosten J.M.F., De Ridder D.T.D., De Wit J.B.F., Evers C. Planning what not to eat: Ironic effects of implementation intentions negating unhealthy habits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2011, 37:69-81.
3. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Newbury Park, London, England.
4. Andersson E.K., Moss T.P. Imagery and implementation intention: A randomised controlled trial of interventions to increase exercise behaviour in the general population. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2011, 12:63-70.
5. Bechara A., Van der Linden M. Decision-making and impulse control after frontal lobe injuries. Current Opinion in Neurology 2005, 18:734-739.
6. Billieux J., Gay P., Rochat L., Van der Linden M. The role of urgency and its underlying psychological mechanisms in problematic behaviours. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2010, 48:1085-1096.
7. Billieux J., Rochat L., Ceschi G., Carré A., Offerlin-Meyer I., Defeldre A.-C., et al. Validation of a short French version of the UPPS-P impulsive behavior scale. Comprehensive Psychiatry 2012, 53:609-615.
8. Brandstätter V., Lengfelder A., Gollwitzer P.M. Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 81:946-960.
9. Burkard C., Rochat L., Emmenegger J., Juillerat Van der Linden A.-C., Gold G., Van der Linden M. Implementation intentions improve prospective memory and inhibition performances in the elderly: The role of visualization 2013, (submitted for publication).
10. Chapman J., Armitage C.J. Evidence that boosters augment the long-term impact of implementation intentions on fruit and vegetable intake. Psychology and Health 2010, 25:365-381.
11. Chapman J., Armitage C.J., Norman P. Comparing implementation intention interventions in relation to young adults' intake of fruit and vegetables. Psychology and Health 2009, 24:317-332.
12. Churchill S., Jessop D. Spontaneous implementation intentions and impulsivity: Can impulsivity moderate the effectiveness of planning strategies?. British Journal of Health Psychology 2010, 15:529-541.
13. Churchill S., Jessop D.C. Too impulsive for implementation intentions? Evidence that impulsivity moderates the effectiveness of an implementation intention intervention. Psychology and Health 2011, 26:517-530.
14. Cohen A.L., Bayer U.C., Jaudas A., Gollwitzer P.M. Self-regulatory strategy and executive control: Implementation intentions modulate task switching and Simon task performance. Psychological Research 2008, 72:12-26.
15. Cyders M.A., Coskunpinar A. Measurement of constructs using self-report and behavioral lab tasks: Is there overlap in nomothetic span and construct representation for impulsivity?. Clinical Psyhology Review 2011, 31:965-982.
16. Cyders M.A., Smith G.T. Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: Positive and negative urgency. Psychological Bulletin 2008, 134:807-828.
17. Enticott P.G., Ogloff J.R.P. Elucidation of impulsivity. Australian Psychologist 2006, 41:3-14.
18. Gaudreau P., Sanchez X., Blondin J.-P. Positive and negative affective states in a performance-related setting: Testing the factorial structure of the PANAS across two samples of French-Canadian participants. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 2006, 22:240-249.
19. Gawrilow C., Gollwitzer P.M. Implementation intentions facilitate response inhibition in children with ADHD. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2008, 32:261-280.
20. Gawrilow C., Gollwitzer P.M., Oettingen G. If-then plans benefit executive functions in children with ADHD. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 2011, 30:616-646.
21. Gay P., Rochat L., Billieux J., d'Acremont M., Van der Linden M. Heterogeneous inhibition processes involved in different facets of self-reported impulsivity: Evidence from a community sample. Acta Psychologica 2008, 129:332-339.
22. Gilbert S.J., Gollwitzer P.M., Cohen A.L., Oettingen G., Burgess P.W. Separable brain systems supporting cued versus self-initiated realization of delayed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:905-915.
23. Gollwitzer P.M. Goal achievement: The role of intentions. European Review of Social Psychology 1993, 4:141-185.
24. Gollwitzer P.M. Implementation intentions. American Psychologist 1999, 54:493-503.
25. Gollwitzer P.M., Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2006, 38:69-119.
26. Goudriaan A.E., Oosterlaan J., de Beurs E., van den Brink W. Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: A comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls. Addiction 2006, 101:534-547.
27. Grilli M.D., McFarland C.P. Imagine that: Self-imagination improves prospective memory in memory-impaired individuals with neurological damage. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2011, 21:847-859.
28. Knäuper B., McCollam A., Rosen-Brown A., Lacaille J., Kelso E., Roseman M. Fruitful plans: Adding mental imagery to implementation intentions increases fruit consumption. Psychology and Health 2011, 26:601-617.
29. Knäuper B., Roseman M., Johnson P.J., Krantz L.H. Using mental imagery to enhance the effectiveness of implementation intentions. Current Psychology 2009, 28:181-186.
30. Lengfelder A., Gollwitzer P.M. Reflective and reflexive action control in patients with frontal brain lesions. Neuropsychology 2001, 15:80-100.
31. Logan G.D. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A user's guide to the stop signal paradigm. Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language 1994, 189-239. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. D. Dagenbach, T.H. Carr (Eds.).
32. Logan G.D., Cowan W.B. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review 1984, 91:295-327.
33. Logan G.D., Schachar R.J., Tannock R. Impulsivity and inhibitory control. Psychological Science 1997, 8:60-64.
34. Maglio S.J., Gollwitzer P.M., Oettingen G. Action control by implementation intentions: The role of discrete emotions. Decomposing the will 2013, 221-243. Oxford University Press, New York. A. Clark, J. Kiverstein, T. Vierkant (Eds.).
35. McFarland C., Glisky E. Implementation intentions and imagery: Individual and combined effects on prospective memory among young adults. Memory and Cognition 2011, 40:62-69.
36. Meeks J.T., Marsh R.L. Implementation intentions about nonfocal event-based prospective memory tasks. Psychological Research 2010, 74:82-89.
37. Miyake A., Friedman N.P., Emerson M.J., Witzki A.H., Howerter A. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology 2000, 41:49-100.
38. Noël X., Bechara A., Dan B., Hanak C., Verbanck P. Response inhibition deficit is involved in poor decision making under risk in nonamnesic individuals with alcoholism. Neuropsychology 2007, 21:778-786.
39. Oettingen G., Hönig G., Gollwitzer P.M. Effective self-regulation of goal attainment. International Journal of Educational Research 2000, 33:705-732.
40. Paul I., Gawrilow C., Zech F., Gollwitzer P.M., Rockstroh B., Odenthal G., et al. If-then planning modulates the P300 in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. NeuroReport 2007, 18:653-657.
41. Pessoa L. How do emotion and motivation direct executive control?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:160-166.
42. Shelton J.T., Elliott E.M., Hill B.D., Calamia M.R., Gouvier W.D. A comparison of laboratory and clinical working memory tests and their prediction of fluid intelligence. Intelligence 2009, 37:283-293.
43. Verbruggen F., De Houwer J. Do emotional stimuli interfere with response inhibition? Evidence from the stop signal paradigm. Cognition and Emotion 2007, 21:391-403.
44. Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 54:1063-1070.
45. Watson D., Wiese D., Vaidya J., Tellegen A. The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 76:820-838.
46. Webb T.L., Sheeran P. Can implementation intentions help to overcome ego-depletion?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2003, 39:279-286.
47. Wechsler D. Echelle d'intelligence de Wechsler pour adultes [Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale] 2000, Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée, Paris. 3rd ed.
48. Whiteside S.P., Lynam D.R. The five factor model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences 2001, 30:669-689.