An Evaluation of Harvest Control Rules for Data-Poor Fisheries

North American Journal of Fisheries Management

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 845-860

  Wiedenmann, John ^a,b   Wilberg, Michael J ^a   Miller, Thomas J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CATCH STATISTICS; EXPLOITATION; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHERY POLICY; HARVESTING; LIFE HISTORY; OVERFISHING; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; RELATIVE ABUNDANCE; STANDARD (REGULATION);

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84882638118     PISSN: 02755947     EISSN: 15488675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2013.811128     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Berkson, J., Barbieri, L., Cadrin, S. X., Cass-Calay, S. L., Crone, P., Dorn, M., Friess, C., Kobayashi, D., Miller, T. J., Patrick, W. S., Pautzke, S., Ralston, S. and Trianni, M. 2011. Calculating acceptable biological catch for stocks that have reliable catch data only (only reliable catch stocks-ORCS). NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-616, Available: http://www.pifsc.noaa.gov/tech/NOAA_Tech_Memo_SEFSC_616.pdf. (February 2011)
2. Cope, J. M. and Punt, A. E. 2009. Length-based reference points for data-limited situations: applications and restrictions. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science, 1: 169 - 186. [online serial]
3. Costello, C., Ovando, D., Hilborn, R., Gaines, S. G., Deschenes, O. and Lester, S. E. 2012. Status and solutions for the world's unassessed fisheries. Science, 338: 517 - 520.
4. Deroba, J. J. and Bence, J. R. 2008. A review of harvest policies: understanding relative performance of control rules. Fisheries Research, 94: 210 - 223.
5. Dick, E. J. and MacCall, A. D. 2011. Depletion-based stock reduction analysis: a catch-based method for determining sustainable yields for data-poor fish stocks. Fisheries Research, 110: 331 - 341.
6. Hilborn, R. 2008. Pretty good yield and exploited fishes. Marine Policy, 34: 193 - 196.
7. MacCall, A. D. 2009. Depletion-corrected average catch: a simple formula for estimating sustainable yields in data-poor situations. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 2267 - 2271.
8. Myers, R. A., Bowen, K. G. and Barrowman, N. J. 1999. Maximum reproductive rates of fish at low population sizes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 56: 2404 - 2419.
9. NEFSC (Northeast Fisheries Science Center). 2002. " Final report of the working group on re-evaluation of biological reference points for NewEngland groundfish ". Woods Hole, Massachusetts: NEFSC. Reference Document 02-04, Available: http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/. (July 2010)
10. NEFSC (Northeast Fisheries Science Center). 2006. 43rd Northeast regional stock assessment workshop (43rd SAW), stock assessment review committee (SARC), consensus summary of assessments, Woods Hole, Massachusetts: NEFSC. Reference Document 06-25, Available: http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/. (April 2011)
11. NEFSC (Northeast Fisheries Science Center). 2008. " 47th Northeast regional stock assessment workshop (47th SAW), assessment report ". Woods Hole, Massachusetts: NEFSC, Reference Document 08-12a. Available: http://www.nefsc.noaa. gov/nefsc/publications/. (October 2011)
12. NEFSC (Northeast Fisheries Science Center). 2010. 49th Northeast regional stock assessment workshop (49th SAW), assessment report, Woods Hole, Massachusetts: NEFSC, Reference Document 10-03. Available http://www.nefsc.noaa. gov/nefsc/publications/. (March 2012)
13. Patrick, W. S., Spencer, P., Ormseth, O., Cope, J., Field, J., Kobayashi, D., Gedamke, T., Cortés, E., Bigelow, K., Overholtz, W., Link, J. and Lawson, P. 2009. Use of productivity and susceptibility indices to determine stock vulnerability, with example applications to six U.S. fisheries. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-101, Available: http://www.pifsc.noaa.gov/library/pubs/NOAA_TM_NMFS_F-SPO_101.pdf. (November 2012)
14. Prager, M. H. and Shertzer, K. W. 2010. Deriving acceptable biological catch from the overfishing limit: implications for assessment models. NorthAmerican Journal of Fisheries Management, 30: 289 - 294.
15. Quinn, T. and Deriso, R. 1999. Quantitative fish dynamics, New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Ralston, S., Punt, A. E., Hamel, O. S., DeVore, J. D. and Conser, R. J. 2011. A meta-analytic approach to quantifying scientific uncertainty in stock assessments. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin, 109: 217 - 231.
17. Restrepo, V. R., Thompson, G. G., Mace, P. M., Gabriel, W. L., Low, L. L., MacCall, A. D., Methot, R. D., Powers, J. E., Taylor, B. L., Wade, P. R. and Witzig, J. F. 1998. Technical guidance on the use of precautionary approaches to implementing National Standard 1 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-31,
18. Scandol, J. P. 2003. Use of cumulative sum (CUSUM) control charts of landed catch in the management of fisheries. Fisheries Research, 64: 19 - 36.
19. Shepherd, J. G. 1982. A versatile new stock-recruitment relationship for fisheries, and the construction of sustainable yield curves. Journal du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, 40: 67-75
20. Shertzer, K., Prager, M. and Williams, E. 2008. A probability-based approach to setting annual catch levels. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin, 106: 225 - 232.
21. Thorson, J. T., Branch, T. A. and Jensen, O. P. 2012a. Using model-based inference to evaluate global fisheries status from landings, location, and life history data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 69: 645 - 655.
22. Thorson, J. T., Cope, J. M., Branch, T. A. and Jensen, O. P. 2012b. Spawning biomass reference points for exploited marine fishes, incorporating taxonomic and body size information. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 69: 1556 - 1568.
23. Vasconcellos, M. and Cochrane, K. 2005. " Overview of world status of data-limited fisheries: inferences from landings statistics ". In Fisheries assessment and management in data-limited situations, Edited by: Kruse, G. H., Gallucci, V. F., Hay, D. E., Perry, R. I., Peterman, R. M., Shirley, T. C., Spencer, P. D., Wilson, B. and Woodby, D. 1 - 20. Fairbanks: Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska.
24. Walters, C. J., Martell, S. J. D. and Korman, J. 2006. A stochastic approach to stock reduction analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 63: 212 - 223.
25. Wetzel, C. R. and Punt, A. E. 2011. Model performance for the determination of appropriate harvest levels in the case of data-poor stocks. Fisheries Research, 110: 342 - 355.
26. Zhou, S., Yin, S., Thorson, J. T., Smith, A. D. M. and Fuller, M. 2012. Linking fishing mortality reference points to life history traits: an empirical study. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 69: 1292 - 1301.