BREEDING AND GENETICS SYMPOSIUM: A systems biology definition for chicken semen quality

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 523-529

  Froman, D P ^a   Rhoads, D D ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Chicken; Phenotype; Semen; Single nucleotide polymorphism; SNPlotype; Sperm

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHICKEN; GENOTYPE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; STANDARD; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; GENOTYPE; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM MOTILITY; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84882619144     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: 15253163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5681     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Amann, R. P. 1981. A critical review of methods for the evaluation of spermatogenesis from seminal characteristics. J. Androl. 2:37-58.
2. Bailes, S. M., J. J. Devers, J. D. Kirby, and D. D. Rhoads. 2007. An inexpensive, simple protocol for DNA isolation from blood for high-throughput genotyping by polymerase chain reaction or restriction endonuclease digestion. Poult. Sci. 86:102-106.
3. Birkhead, T. R., J. G. Martínez, T. Burke, and D. P. Froman. 1999. Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl. Proc. Biol. Sci. 266:1759-1764.
4. de Reviers, M., and J. B. Williams. 1984. Testis development and production of spermatozoa in the cockerel (Gallus domesticus). In: F. J. Cunningham, P. E. Lake, and D. Hewitt, editors, Reproductive biology of poultry. British Poultry Science Ltd., Harlow, UK. p. 183-202.
5. Federation of Animal Science Societies (FASS). 2010. Poultry. In: Guide for the care and use of agricultural animals in research and teaching, 3rd ed. FASS, Champaign, IL. p. 103-128.
6. Freeman, B. M. 1985. Appendix X. Reproduction: Semen. In: Physiology and biochemistry of the domestic fowl, vol. 5. Academic Press, London, UK. p. 422-423.
7. Froman, D. P., E. R. Bowling, and J. L. Wilson. 2003. Sperm mobility phenotype not determined by sperm quality index. Poult. Sci. 82:496-502.
8. Froman, D. P., and A. J. Feltmann. 1998. Sperm mobility: A quantitative trait of the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Biol. Reprod. 58:379-384.
9. Froman, D. P., and A. J. Feltmann. 2000. Sperm mobility: Phenotype in roosters (Gallus domesticus) determined by concentration of motile sperm and straight line velocity. Biol. Reprod. 62:303-309.
10. Froman, D. P., A. J. Feltmann, K. Pendarvis, A. M. Cooksey, S. C. Burgess, and D. D. Rhoads. 2011. A proteome-based model for sperm mobility phenotype. J. Anim. Sci. 89:1330-1337.
11. Froman, D. P., A. J. Feltmann, M. L. Rhoads, and J. D. Kirby. 1999. Sperm mobility: A primary determinant of fertility in the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Biol. Reprod. 61:400-405.
12. Froman, D. P., and J. D. Kirby. 2005. Sperm mobility: Phenotype in roosters (Gallus domesticus) determined by mitochondrial function. Biol. Reprod. 72:562-567.
13. Froman, D. P., T. Pizzari, A. J. Feltmann, H. Castillo-Juarez, and T. R. Birkhead. 2002. Sperm mobility: Mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relation-ship with male status in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus. Proc. Biol. Sci. 269:607-612.
14. Froman, D. P., and D. D. Rhoads. 2012. Validation of a spectropho-tometer-based method for estimating daily sperm production and deferent duct transit. Poult. Sci. 91:2621-2627.
15. Groenen, M., H.-J. Megens, Y. Zare, W. Warren, L. Hillier, R. Crooi-jmans, A. Vereijken, R. Okimoto, W. Muir, and H. Cheng. 2011. The development and characterization of a 60K SNP chip for chicken. BMC Genomics 12:274.
16. Lake, P. E. 1981. Male genital organs. In: A. S. King and J. McLel-land, editors, Form and function in birds, volume 2. Academic Press, London, UK. p. 1-61.
17. Lake, P. E. 1984. The male in reproduction. In: Physiology and biochemistry of domestic fowl, vol. 5. B. M. Freeman, editor, Academic Press, London, UK. p. 381-405.
18. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1969a. Correlation. In: Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA. p. 494-548.
19. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1969b. Nested analysis of variance. In: Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA. p. 253-298.
20. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1969c. Single classification analysis of variance. In: Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA. p. 204-252.
21. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1969d. Analysis of frequencies. In: Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA. p. 549-620.
22. Westerhoff, H. V., and D. B. Kell. 2007. The methodologies of systems biology. In: F. C. Boogerd, F. J. Bruggeman, J.-H. S. Hofmeyr, and H. V. Westerhoff, editors, Systems biology: Philosophical foundations. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p. 23-70.
23. Wishart, G. J. 2009. Semen quality and semen storage. In: P. Hocking, editor, Biology of breeding poultry, Poultry Science Symposium Series, vol. 29. MPG Books Group, London, UK. p. 151-178.