Contrast Sensitivity and Glare Testing

Borish's Clinical Refraction

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 247-288

  Elliott, David B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882595580     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7506-7524-6.50013-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (225)

1. Nelson P, Aspinall P, Papasouliotis O, et al. Quality of life in glaucoma and its relationship with visual function. J Glaucoma 2003, 12:139-150.
2. McGwin G, Scilley K, Brown J, et al. Impact of cataract surgery on self-reported visual difficulties-comparison with a no-surgery reference group. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003, 29:941-948.
3. West SK, Rubin GS, Broman AT, et al. How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE Project. Arch Ophthalmol 2002, 120:774-780.
4. Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Brabyn J, Schneck ME, et al. The SKILL Card. An acuity test of reduced luminance and contrast. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999, 38:207-218.
5. Lord SR, Dayhew J Visual risk factors for falls in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001, 49:508-515.
6. Anand V, Buckley JG, Scally A, Elliott DB Postural stability changes in the elderly with cataract simulation and refractive blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003, 44:4670-4675.
7. Turano K, Rubin GS, Herdman SJ, et al. Visual stabilization of posture in the elderly: fallers versus non-fallers. Optom Vis Sci 1994, 70:761-769.
8. Wood JM, Troutbeck R Effect of visual impairment on driving. Hum Factors 1994, 36:476-487.
9. Owsley C, Stalvey BT, Wells J, et al. Visual risk factors for crash involvement in older drivers with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 2001, 119:881-887.
10. Leat SJ, Woodhouse JM Reading performance with low vision aids: relationship with contrast sensitivity. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1993, 13:9.
11. Haymes SA, Johnston AW, Heyes AD Relationship between vision impairment and ability to perform activities of daily living. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002, 22:79-91.
12. Szlyk JP, Seiple W, Fishman GA, et al. Perceived and actual performance of daily tasks: relationship to visual function tests in individuals with retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology 2001, 108:65-75.
13. Rubin GS, Roche KB, Prasada-Rao P, et al. Visual impairment and disability in older adults. Optom Vis Sci 1994, 71:750-760.
14. Leat SJ, Legge GE, Bullimore MA What is low vision? A re-evaluation of definitions. Optom Vis Sci 1999, 76:198-211.
15. Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy-a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2002, 109:175-187.
16. Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG, et al. Posterior capsular opacification with hydrogel, polymethylmethacrylate, and silicone intraocular lenses: two-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Am J Ophthalmol 2000, 129:577-584.
17. Hepsen IF, Uz E, Sogut S, et al. Early contrast sensitivity loss and oxidative damage in healthy heavy smokers. Neurol Res Comm 2003, 32:123-133.
18. Baker LJ, Baier ML, Pelak VS, et al. New low-contrast vision charts: reliability and test characteristics in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mull Scler 2000, 6:163-171.
19. Stavrou EP, Wood JM Letter contrast sensitivity changes in early diabetic retinopathy. Clin Exp Optom 2003, 86:152-156.
20. Ismail GM, Whitaker D Early detection of changes in visual function in diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998, 18:3-12.
21. Kaiserman I, Hazarbassanov R, Varssano D, et al. Contrast sensitivity after wave front-guided LASIK. Ophthalmology 2004, 111:454-457.
22. Hersh PS, Stulting RD, Steinert RF, et al. Results of phase III excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. Ophthalmology 1997, 104:1535-1553.
23. Chylack LT, Wolfe JK, Friend J, et al. Validation of methods for the assessment of cataract progression in the Roche European-American Anticataract Trial (REACT). Ophthalmol Epidemiol 1995, 2:59-75.
24. Bressler NM Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration with verteporfin: two-year results of 2 randomized clinical trials-TAP Report 2. Arch Ophthalmol 2001, 119:198-207. Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) Study Group.
25. Beck RW, Gal RL, Bhatti MX, et al. Visual function more than 10 years after optic neuritis: experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Am J Ophthalmol 2004, 137:77-83.
26. Trobe JD, Beck RW, Moke PS, et al. Contrast sensitivity and other vision tests in the optic neuritis treatment trial. Am J Ophthalmol 1996, 121:547-553.
27. Robson JG Contrast sensitivity: one hundred years of clinical measurement. Contrast Sensitivity 1993, 253. MIT Press., Cambridge. R. Shapley, D.M.-K. Lam (Eds.).
28. Charman WN Limits on visual performance set by the eye's optics and the retinal cone mosaic. Vision and Visual Dysfunction 1991, 5:81. Macmillan Press, London. J. Cronly-Dillon (Ed.).
29. Regan D A brief review of some of the stimuli and analysis methods used in spatiotemporal vision research. Vision and Visual Dysfunction 1991, 10:64. Macmillan Press., London. J. Cronly-Dillon (Ed.).
30. Campbell FW, Robson JG Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. J Physiol 1968, 197:551-566.
31. Enroth-Cugell C, Robson JG The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J Physiol 1966, 187:517-522.
32. Livingstone MS, Hubel DH Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement and depth. J Neurosci 1987, 7:3416-3468.
33. Rodiek RW Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. Vis Res 1965, 5:583-601.
34. Wilson HR Psychophysical models of spatial vision and hyperacuity. Vision and Visual Dysfunction 1991, 10:1. Macmillan Press., London. J. Cronly-Dillon (Ed.).
35. Regan D The Charles F. Prentice Award Lecture 1990: Specific tests and specific blindnesses: keys, locks, and parallel processing. Optom Vis Sci 1991, 68:489-512.
36. Ginsburg AP A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1984, 61:403-407.
37. Blakemore C, Campbell FW On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J Physiol 1969, 203:237-260.
38. Smith WJ Modern Optical Engineering 1966, 310. McGraw-Hill., New York.
39. Leguire LE Do letter charts measure contrast sensitivity?. Clin Vis Sci 1991, 6:391.
40. Elliott DB, Gilchrist J, Whitaker D Contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity changes with three types of cataract morphology: are these techniques necessary in a clinical evaluation of cataract?. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1989, 9:25-30.
41. Storch RL, Bodis-Wollner I Overview of contrast sensitivity and neuro-ophthalmic disease. Glare and Contrast Sensitivity for Clinicians 1990, 85. Springer-Verlag., New York. M.P. Nadler, D. Miller, D.J. Nadler (Eds.).
42. Woods RL, Strang NC, Atchison DA Measuring contrast sensitivity with inappropriate optical correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2000, 20:442-451.
43. Rubin GS Reliability and sensitivity of clinical contrast sensitivity tests. Clin Vis Sci 1988, 2:169-177.
44. Owsley C Vision and driving in the elderly. Optom Vis Sci 1994, 71:727-735.
45. Balboa RM, Grzywacz NM Power spectra and distribution of contrasts of natural images from different habitats. Vision Res 2003, 43:2527-2537.
46. Legge G. 1993. Aspects of contrast sensitivity with general disagreement. Proceedings of the Eye Care Technology Forum, 2nd annual meeting, p 160, NIH Bethesda, FL.
47. Elliott DB, Bullimore MA, Patla A, et al. The effect of a cataract simulation on clinical and real world vision. Br J Ophthalmol 1996, 80:799-804.
48. Pelli DG The visual requirements of mobility. Low Vision-Principles and Applications 1986, 134-146. Springer., New York. G.C. Woo (Ed.).
49. Pardhan S, Elliott DB Clinical measurements of binocular summation and inhibition in patients with cataract. Clin Vis Sci 1991, 6:355-359.
50. Campbell FW, Green DG Monocular versus binocular visual acuity. Nature 1965, 208:191-192.
51. Valberg A, Fosse P Binocular contrast inhibition in subjects with age-related macular degeneration. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2002, 19:223-228.
52. Laidlaw A, Harrad R Can second eye cataract extraction be justified?. Eye 1993, 7:680-686.
53. McElvanney A, Moseley M, Jones HS Binocular inhibition of visual performance in patients with cataract. Acta Ophthalmol 1994, 72:606-611.
54. Ginsburg AP, Cannon MW Comparison of three methods for rapid determination of threshold contrast sensitivity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983, 24:798-802.
55. Long CM, Tuck JP Reliabilities of alternate measures of contrast sensitivity functions. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988, 65:37-48.
56. King-Smith PL, Grigsby SS, Vingrys AJ, et al. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Res 1994, 34:885-912.
57. McKee SP, Klein SA, Teller DY Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions. Implications of probit analysis. Percept Psychophys 1985, 37:286-298.
58. Wetherill GB, Levitt H Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. Br J Math Stat Psychol 1965, 18:1-10.
59. Watson AB, Pelli DG QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Percept Psychophys 1983, 33:113-120.
60. Madigan R, Williams D Maximum-likelihood psychometric functions in two-alternative forced-choice: evaluation and recommendations. Percept Psychophys 1987, 42:240-249.
61. Higgins KE, Jaffe MJ, Caruso RC, et al. Spatial contrast sensitivity: effects of age, test-retest and psychophysical method. J Opt Soc Am 1988, A5:2173-2180.
62. Vaegan Halliday BL A forced-choice test improves clinical contrast sensitivity testing. Br J Ophthalmol 1982, 66:477-491.
63. Rubin GS, et al. American Academy of Ophthalmology report. Contrast sensitivity and glare testing in the evaluation of anterior segment disease. Ophthalmology 1990, 97:1233-1237.
64. Elliott DB, Bullimore MA Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993, 34:108-119.
65. Carkeet A Modeling logMAR visual acuity scores: effects of termination rules and alternative forced-choice options. Optom Vis Sci 2001, 78:529-538.
66. Elliott DB, Whitaker D Clinical contrast sensitivity chart evaluation. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1992, 12:275.
67. Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, et al. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991, 32:422-432.
68. Elliott DB, Hurst MA, Weatherill J Comparing clinical tests of visual function in cataract with the patient's perceived visual disability. Eye 1990, 4:712-717.
69. Reeves B Unfortunately diseases are rare. Optician 1989, 197(5298):18-19. 21-24.
70. Bland JM, Altman DG Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 1:307-310.
71. Elliott DB, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL Improving the reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test. Clin Vis Sci 1991, 6:471-475.
72. Pesudovs K, Hazel CA, Doran RM, et al. The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research. Br J Ophthalmol 2004, 88:11-16.
73. Regan D Do letter charts measure contrast sensitivity?. Clin Vis Sci 1991, 6:401.
74. Pelli DG, Robson JG Are letters better than gratings?. Clin Vis Sci 1991, 6:409.
75. Ginsburg AP Next generation contrast sensitivity testing. Functional Assessment of Low Vision 1996, 77. Mosby-Year Book., St. Louis. B. Rosenthal, R. Cole (Eds.).
76. Akutsu H, Bedell HE, Patel SS Recognition thresholds for letters with simulated dioptric blur. Optom Vis Sci 2000, 77:524-530.
77. Legge GE, Pelli DG, Rubin GS, et al. Psychophysics of reading-I. Normal vision. Vis Res 1985, 27:1165-1178.
78. Johansen J, Dam-Johansen M, Olsen T Contrast sensitivity with silicone and polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997, 23:1085-1088.
79. Tan JC, Spalton DJ, Arden GB The effect of neodymium: YAG capsulotomy on contrast sensitivity and the evaluation of methods for its assessment. Ophthalmology 1999, 106:703-709.
80. Fan-Paul NI, Li J, Miller JS, et al. Night vision disturbances after corneal refractive surgery. Sun Ophthalmol 2002, 47:533-546.
81. Montes-Mico R, Charman WN Mesopic contrast sensitivity function after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 2002, 18:9-13.
82. Fortuin GJ Visual power and visibility. Philips Res Rep 1951, 6:251. 347.
83. Arden GB, Jacobson JJ A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity; preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978, 17:23-32.
84. Reeves BC, Hill AR, Ross JE Test-retest reliability of the Arden Crating Test: inter-tester variability. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1988, 8:128-138.
85. Wilkins AJ, Delia Sala S, Somazzi L, et al. Age-related norms for the Cambridge low contrast gratings, including details concerning their design and use. Clin Vis Sci 1988, 2:201-212.
86. Jones HJ, Moseley MJ, Thompson JR Reliability of the Cambridge low contrast gratings. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1994, 14:287-289.
87. Reeves BC, Wood JM, Hill AR Vistech VCTS 6500 charts: within- and between-session reliability. Optom Vis Sci 1991, 68:728-737.
88. Elliott DB, Situ P Visual acuity versus letter contrast sensitivity in early cataract. Vision Res 1998, 38:2047-2052.
89. Elliott DB Evaluating visual function in cataract. Optom Vis Sci 1993, 70:896-902.
90. Adamsons I, Rubin GS, Vitale S, et al. The effect of early cataracts on glare and contrast sensitivity: a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol 1992, 110:1081-1086.
91. Elliott DB, Patla AE, Furniss M, Adkin A Improvements in clinical and functional vision and quality of life after second eye cataract surgery. Optom Vis Sci 2000, 77:13-24.
92. Rabin J Optical defocus: differential effects on size and contrast letter recognition thresholds. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994, 35:646-648.
93. Rabin I, Wicks J Measuring resolution in the contrast domain-the small letter contrast test. Optom Vis Sci 1996, 73:398-403.
94. Rabin J, Eckroth K, Leon G, et al. 2004. Quantification of visual resolution in the contrast domain. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ARVO abstract No. 4351.
95. van de Pol C, Soya K, Hwang DG Objective assessment of transient corneal haze and its relation to visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2001, 132:204-210.
96. Bailey I Detecting early vision losses in the elderly. Optom Vis Sci 1993, 70:299-305.
97. Regan D, Giaschi DE, Fresco BB Measurement of glare sensitivity in cataract patients using low-contrast letter charts. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1993, 13:115-123.
98. Haegerstrom-Portnoy G Evaluating visual function in special populations. Optom Vis Sci 1993, 70:306-314.
99. Hazel CA, Elliott DB The dependency of logMAR visual acuity measurements on chart design and scoring rule. Optom Vis Sci 2002, 79:788-792.
100. Long DT, Beck RW, Moke PS, et al. The SKILL Card test in optic neuritis: experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. J Neuroophthalmol 2001, 21:124-131.
101. Schneck ME, Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Lott LA, et al. Low contrast vision function predicts subsequent acuity loss in an aged population: the SKI study. Vision Res 2004, 44:2317-2325.
102. Haymes SA, Chen J Reliability and validity of the Melbourne Edge Test and High/Low Contrast Visual Acuity chart. Optom Vis Sci 2004, 81:308-316.
103. Pomerance GN, Evans DW Test-restest reliability of the CSV-1000 contrast test and its relationship to glaucoma therapy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994, 35:3357-3361.
104. Kennedy RS, Dunlap WP Assessment of the Vistech contrast sensitivity test for repeated-measures applications. Optom Vis Sci 1990, 67:248-251.
105. Reeves BC, Wood JM, Hill AR Vistech VCTS 6500 charts: within- and between-session reliability. Optom Vis Sci 1991, 68:728-737.
106. Pesudovs K, Hazel CA, Doran RML, Elliott DB The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research. Br J Ophthalmol 2004, 88:11-16.
107. Pelli DG, Rubin GS, Legge GE Predicting the contrast sensitivity of low vision observers. J Opt Soc Am 1986, 3:56.
108. Rohaly AM, Owsley C Modelling the contrast sensitivity functions of older adults. J Opt Soc Am 1993, 10:1591-1599.
109. Campbell FW, Green DG Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol 1965, 181:576.
110. Bradley A, Hook J, Haeseker J A comparison of clinical acuity and contrast sensitivity charts: Effect of uncorrected myopia. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1991, 11:218-226.
111. Elliott DB, Whitaker D, Bonette L Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1990, 10:323-326.
112. Woods RL, Thomson WD A comparison of psychometric methods for measuring the contrast sensitivity of experienced observers. Clin Vis Sci 1993, 8:401-405.
113. Mohn G, van Hof-van Duin J Development of spatial vision. Vision and Visual Dysfunction 1991, 10:179. Macmillan Press., London. J. Cronly-Dillon (Ed.).
114. Ciuffreda KJ, Levi DM, Selenow A Amblyopia. Basic and Clinical Aspects 1991, Butterworth-Heinemann., Boston.
115. Spear PD Neural bases of visual deficits during aging. Vis Res 1993, 33:2589-2609.
116. Pardhan S, Gilchrist J, Elliott DB, et al. A comparison of sampling efficiency and internal noise level in young and old subjects. Vis Res 1996, 36:1641-1648.
117. Pardhan S Contrast sensitivity loss with aging: sampling efficiency and equivalent noise at different spatial frequencies. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2004, 21:169-175.
118. Calver RI, Cox MJ, Elliott DB Effect of aging on the monochromatic aberrations of the human eye. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1999, 16:2069-2078.
119. Moseley MJ, Hill AR Contrast sensitivity testing in clinical practice. Br J Ophthalmol 1994, 78:795-797.
120. Lederer PJ, Bosse JC Clinical use of contrast sensitivity evaluation for general practice of optometry. Pract Optom 1992, 3:34-48.
121. Bailey MD, Olson MD, Bullimore MA, et al. The effect of LASIK on best-corrected high-and low-contrast visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 2004, 81:362-368.
122. Tanabe T, Miyata K, Samejima T, et al. Influence of wavefront aberration and corneal subepithelial haze on low-contrast visual acuity after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2004, 138:620-624.
123. Rubin GS, Legge GE Psychophysics of reading. VI-The role of contrast in low vision. Vis Res 1989, 29:79-91.
124. Whitaker SG, Lovie-Kitchin J Visual requirements for reading. Optom Vis Sci 1993, 70:54-65.
125. Rumney NJ Using visual thresholds to establish low vision performance. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1995, 15:S18-S24.
126. Loshin DS, White J Contrast sensitivity: the visual rehabilitation of the patient with macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 1984, 102:1303-1306.
127. Eldred KB, Jose RT Binocular contrast sensitivity testing for low vision patients. J Am Optom Assoc 1991, 62:766-769.
128. Cataract Management Guideline Panel: Cataract in adults: management of functional impairment. Clinical Practice Guideline, Number 4 1993, AHCPR Pub. No. 93-0542., US Department of Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD, February 1993.
129. Elliott DB, Whitaker D How useful are contrast sensitivity charts in optometric practice?. Optom Vis Sci 1992, 69:378.
130. Arend O, Remky A, Evans D, et al. Contrast sensitivity loss is coupled with capillary dropout in patients with diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997, 38:1819-1824.
131. North RV, Farrell U, Banford D, et al. Visual function in young IDDM patients over 8 years of age. A 4-year longitudinal study. Diabetes Care 1997, 20:1724-1730.
132. Banford D, North RV, Dolben J, et al. Longitudinal study of visual functions in young insulin dependent diabetics. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1994, 14:339-346.
133. Verrotti A, Lobefalo L, Petitti MT, et al. Relationship between contrast sensitivity and metabolic control in diabetics with and without retinopathy. Ann Med 1998, 30:369-374.
134. Woo GC Contrast sensitivity function as a diagnostic tool in low vision. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985, 62:648-651.
135. Wood JM, Lovie-Kitchin JE Evaluation of the efficacy of contrast sensitivity measurements for the detection of primary open-angle glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci 1992, 69:175-181.
136. Sponsel WE, DePaul KL, Martone JF, et al. Association of Vistech contrast sensitivity and visual field findings in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1991, 75:558-560.
137. Bassi CJ, Galanis JC Binocular visual impairment in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1991, 98:1406-1411.
138. Elliott DB, Fonn D, Flanagan JG, et al. The relative sensitivity of clinical tests to hydrophilic lens induced corneal thickness changes. Optom Vis Sci 1993, 70:1044-1048.
139. Hess RF, Howell ER The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: evidence for a two-type classification. Vis Res 1977, 17:1049-1055.
140. Gregg JR Vision and Sports: An Introduction 1987, Butterworths., Toronto.
141. Woods RL, Thomson WD A comparison of psychometric methods for measuring the contrast sensitivity of experienced observers. Clin Vision Sci 1993, 8:401-405.
142. Regan D Visual factors in hitting and catching. J Sports Sci 1997, 15:533-558.
143. McLeod P Visual reaction time and high speed ball games. Perception 1987, 16:49-59.
144. Kruk R, Regan D Visual test results compared with flying performance in telemetry-tracked aircraft. Aviat Space Environ Med 1983, 54:906-911.
145. van den Berg TJTP On the relation between glare and straylight. Doc Ophthalmol 1991, 78:177-181.
146. Lebensohn JE Photophobia: mechanisms and implications. Am J Ophthalmol 1951, 34:1294-1300.
147. Vos JJ Disability glare-a state of the art report. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) 1984, 3:39-53.
148. deWaard PWT, Ijspeert JK, van den Berg TJTP, et al. Intraocular light scattering in age-related cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992, 33:618-625.
149. van den Berg TJTP Analysis of intraocular straylight, especially in relation to aging. Optom Vis Sci 1995, 72:52-59.
150. Yager D, Yuan R, Mathews S What is the utility of the psychophysical "light scattering factor"?. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992, 33:688-690.
151. Thaung J, Beckman C, Abrahamsson M, et al. The "light scattering factor" Importance of stimulus geometry, contrast definition, and adaptation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995, 36:2313-2317.
152. Whitaker D, Elliott DB, Steen R Reconfirmation of the validity of the psychophysical light scattering factor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994, 35:317-321.
153. Maurice DM The structure and transparency of the cornea. J Physiol 1957, 136:263-286.
154. Michael R, van Marie J, Vrensen GF, van den Berg TJ Changes in the refractive index of lens fibre membranes during maturation-impact on lens transpency. Exp Eye Res 2003, 77:93-99.
155. Miller D, Nadler MP Light scattering: its relationship to glare and contrast in patients and normal subjects. Glare and Contrast Sensitivity for Clinicians 1990, 24. Springer-Verlag., New York. M.P. Nadler, D. Miller, D.J. Nadler (Eds.).
156. Finkelstein IS The biophysics of corneal scatter and diffraction of light induced by contact lenses. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1952, 29:185-208.
157. Lackner B, Pieh S, Schmidinger G, et al. Glare and halo phenomena after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003, 29:444-450.
158. van den Berg TJ, Hagenouw MP Ciliary corona and lenticular halo. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001, 27:10-11.
159. Cotlier E The lens. Adler's Physiology of the Eye 1981, 277. Mosby., London. 7th ed. R.A. Moses (Ed.).
160. Hemenger RP Light scatter in cataractous lenses. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1990, 10:394-396.
161. Bettelheim FA Physical basis of lens transparency. The Ocular Lens 1985, 265. Marcel Dekker., New York. H. Maisel (Ed.).
162. Gilliland KO, Freel CD, Johnsen S, et al. Distribution, spherical structure and predicted Mie scattering of multilamellar bodies in human age-related nuclear cataracts. Exp Eye Res 2004, 79:563-576.
163. Bettelheim FA, Ali S Light scattering of normal human lens III. Relationship between forward and back scatter of whole excised lenses. Exp Eye Res 1985, 41:1-9.
164. Elliott DB, Hurst MA Assessing the effect of cataract: a clinical evaluation of the Opacity Lensmeter 701. Optom Vis Sci 1989, 66:257-263.
165. Lohmann CP, Gartry DS, Kerr Muir M, et al. Corneal haze after excimer laser refractive surgery: objective measurements and functional implications. Eur J Ophthalmol 1991, 1:173-180.
166. Weak RA Real light scatter in the human crystalline lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1986, 224:463-466.
167. Ijspeert JK, deWaard PWT, van den Berg TJTP, et al. The intraocular straylight function in 129 healthy volunteers; dependence on angle, age and pigmentation. Vis Res 1990, 30:699-707.
168. van den Berg TJTP, Uspeert JK, deWaard PWT Dependence of intraocular straylight on pigmentation and light transmission through the ocular wall. Vis Res 1991, 31:1361.
169. Wesemann W Incoherent image formation in the presence of scattering eye media. J Opt Soc Am 1987, A4:1439-1447.
170. van den Berg TJTP, Tan KEWP Light transmittance of the human cornea from 320 to 700 nm for different ages. Vis Res 1994, 33:1453-1456.
171. Hemenger RP Sources of intraocular light scatter from inversion of an empirical glare function. Appl Opt 1992, 31:3687-3693.
172. Whitaker D, Steen R, Elliott DB Light scatter in the normal young, elderly and cataractous eye demonstrates little wavelength dependency. Optom Vis Sci 1993, 70:963-968.
173. van den Berg TJTP Quantal and visual efficiency of fluorescence in the lens of the human eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993, 34:3566-3573.
174. Elliott DB, Yang KCH, Dumbleton K, et al. Ultraviolet-induced lenticular fluorescence: intraocular straylight affecting visual function. Vis Res 1993, 33:1827-1833.
175. Zigman S Vision enhancement using a short wavelength light-absorbing filter. Optom Vis Sci 1990, 67:100-124.
176. Siik S, Chylack LT, Friend J, et al. Lens autofluorescence and light scatter in relation to the lens opacities classification system, LOCS III. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999, 77:509-514.
177. Sparrow JM, Bron AJ, Brown NA, et al. Autofluorescence of the crystalline lens in early and late onset diabetes. Br J Ophthalmol 1992, 76:25-31.
178. Whitaker D, Steen R, Elliott D, et al. The effect of disability glare on luminance and colour contrast sensitivities. Optom Vis Sci 1994, 71:792-796.
179. Bailey MD, Mitchell GL, Dhaliwal DK, et al. Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 2003, 110:1371-1378.
180. O'Brart DP, Lohmann CP, Fitzke FW, et al. Night vision after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy: haze and halos. Eur J Ophthalmol 1994, 4:43-51.
181. Brunette I, Gresset J, Boivin JF, et al. Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 2: survey of 690 patients. Ophthalmology 2000, 107:1790-1796.
182. Campbell C Observations on the optical effects of a cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999, 25:995-1003.
183. Neumann AC, McCarthy GR, Locke J, et al. Disability glare devices for cataractous eyes: a consumers guide. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988, 14:212-216.
184. Neumann AC, McCarthy GR, Steedle TO, et al. The relationship between outdoor and indoor Snellen visual acuity in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988, 14:40-45.
185. Meacock WR, Spalton DJ, Boyce J, et al. The effect of posterior capsule opacification on visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003, 44:4665-4669.
186. van den Berg TJTP, Ijspeert JK Clinical assessment of intraocular stray light. Appl Opt 1992, 31:3694-3696.
187. Schallhorn SC, Blanton CL, Kaupp SE, et al. Preliminary results of photorefractive keratectomy in active-duty United States Navy personnel. Ophthalmology 1996, 103:5-22.
188. van den Berg TJ, van Rijn LJ, European GLARE research group. 2004. Retinal straylight as measure for optical integrity of the eye for routine use. Invest Ophth Vis Sci ARVO abstract 5457.
189. Paulsson LE, Sjöstrand J Contrast sensitivity in the presence of a glare light. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1980, 19:401-406.
190. Thaung J, Beckman C, Abrahamsson M, et al. The "light scattering factor". Importance of stimulus geometry, contrast definition, and adaptation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995, 36:2313-2317.
191. Tan JC, Spalton DJ, Arden GB Comparison of methods to assess visual impairment from glare and light scattering with posterior capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998, 24:1626-1631.
192. Laming D Contrast sensitivity. Vision and Visual Dysfunction 1992, 5:35-43. CRC Press, Boca Raton. Cronly-Dillon (Ed.).
193. Estevez O, Cavonius C Low frequency attenuation in the detection of gratings: sorting out the artefacts. Vis Res 1976, 16:497-500.
194. Bailey IL, Bullimore MA A new test for the evaluation of disability glare. Optom Vis Sci 1991, 68:911-917.
195. Regan D, Giaschi DE, Fresco BB Measurement of glare sensitivity in cataract patients using low-contrast letter charts. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1993, 13:115-123.
196. Koch DD, Liu JF Survey of the clinical use of glare and contrast sensitivity testing. J Cataract Refract Surg 1990, 16:707-711.
197. Maltzman BA, Horan C, Rengel A Penlight test for disability glare of cataracts. Ophthalmic Surg 1988, 19:356-358.
198. Miller D, Jernigan ME, Molnar S, et al. Laboratory evaluation of a clinical glare tester. Arch Ophthalmol 1972, 87:324-332.
199. Miller D, Nadler MP Light scattering: its relationship to glare and contrast in patients and normal subjects. Glare and Contrast Sensitivity for Clinicians 1990, 24. Springer-Verlag., New York. M.P. Nadler, D. Miller, D.J. Nadler (Eds.).
200. Waring GO, Lynn MJ, Gelender H, et al. Results of the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy (PERK) study one year after surgery. Ophthalmology 1985, 92:177-198.
201. Frost NA, Sparrow JM Use of vision tests in clinical decision making about cataract surgery: results of a national survey. Br J Ophthalmol 2000, 84:432-434.
202. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Truillo TC, et al. Brightness acuity test and outdoor visual acuity in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 1987, 13:67-69.
203. Prager TC, Urso RG, Holladay JT, et al. Glare testing in cataract patients: instrument evaluation and identification of sources of methodological error. J Cataract Refract Surg 1989, 15:149-157.
204. van Rijn LJ, Wilhelm H, Emesz M, et al. Relation between perceived driving disability and scores of vision screening tests. Br J Ophthalmol 2002, 86:1262-1264.
205. Bass EB, Steinberg EP, Luthra R, et al. Variation in ophthalmic testing prior to cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1995, 113:27-31.
206. Rubin ML The little point that isn't there. Surv Ophthalmol 1972, 17:52-53.
207. Grover S, Alexander KR, Choi DM, Fishman GA Intraocular light scatter in patients with choroideremia. Ophthalmology 1998, 105:1641-1645.
208. Rubin GS, Adamsons IA, Stark WJ Comparison of acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare before and after cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1993, 111:56-61.
209. Coble RR, O'Brart DPS, Lohmann CP, et al. The role of light scatter in the degradation of visual performance before and after Nd:YAG capsulotomy. Eye 1994, 8:530-534.
210. van den Berg TJTP, Hwan BS, Delleman JW The intraocular straylight function in some hereditary corneal dystrophies. Doc Ophthalmol 1993, 85:13-20.
211. Mackie SW, Walsh G Contrast and glare sensitivity in diabetic patients with and without pan-retinal photocoagulation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998, 18:173-181.
212. Katz B, Melles RB, Schneider JA Clare disability in nephropathic cystinosis. Arch Ophthalmol 1987, 105:1670-1671.
213. Bichao IC, Yager D, Meng J Disability glare: effects of temporal characteristics of the gare source and of the visual field location of the test stimulus. J Opt Soc Am 1995, A12:2252-2258.
214. Carney LG, Jacobs RJ Mechanisms of visual loss in corneal edema. Arch Ophthalmol 1984, 102:1068-1071.
215. Feuk T, McQueen D The angular dependence of light scattered from rabbit corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1971, 10:294-299.
216. Mandell RB, Poise KA, Fatt I Corneal swelling caused by contact lens wear. Arch Ophthalmol 1970, 83:3-9.
217. Cox I, Holden BA Can vision loss be used as a quantitative assessment of corneal edema?. Int Contact Lens Clin 1990, 17:176-179.
218. Steen R, Whitaker D, Elliott DB, et al. Effect of filters on disability glare. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1993, 13:371.
219. Kelly SA, Goldberg SE, Banton TA Effect of yellow-tinted lenses on contrast sensitivity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1984, 61:657-662.
220. Sliney DH Eye protective techniques for bright light. Ophthalmology 1983, 90:937-944.
221. Brindley GS The discrimination of after-images. J Physiol 1959, 147:194.
222. Collins M, Brown B Clare recovery and age related maculopathy. Clin Vis Sci 1989, 4:145-153.
223. Wu G, Weiter JJ, Santos S, et al. The macular photostress test in diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 1990, 108:1556-1558.
224. Tengroth B, Hogman B, Linde C-J, et al. Readaptation time after photostress-readaptation time as a function of oxygen concentration. Arch Ophthalmol 1976, 54:507.
225. Glaser JS, Savino PJ, Sumers KD, et al. The photostress recovery test in the clinical assessment of visual function. Am J Ophthalmol 1977, 83:255.