Diabetes distress in type 1 diabetes-a new measurement fit for purpose

Diabetic Medicine

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1132-1139

  Joensen, L E ^a   Tapager, I ^b   Willaing, I ^a  

^a STENO DIABETES CENTER   (Denmark)

^b Holte Stationsvej 14   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIABETES DISTRESS SCALE; DIABETIC DIET; DISTRESS SYNDROME; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EMPOWERMENT; FEMALE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; QUALITY OF LIFE; SHORT FORM 12;

COST OF ILLNESS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DENMARK; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIA; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF CARE; SELF EFFICACY; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 84882582539     PISSN: 07423071     EISSN: 14645491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dme.12241     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Egede LE, Dismuke CE. Serious psychological distress and diabetes: a review of the literature. Curr Psychiatr Rep 2012; 14: 15-22.
2. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, Snoek FJ, Matthews DR, Skovlund SE. Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: results of the Cross-National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study. Diabet Med 2005; 22: 1379-1385.
3. Snoek FJ, Kersch NYA, Eldrup E, Harman-Boehm I, Hermanns N, Kokoszka A et al. Monitoring of Individual Needs in Diabetes (MIND): baseline data from the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) MIND study. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 601-603.
4. Pouwer F, Beekman ATF, Lubach C, Snoek FJ. Nurses' recognition and registration of depression, anxiety and diabetes-specific emotional problems in outpatients with diabetes mellitus. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 60: 235-240.
5. Hermanns N, Kulzer B, Krichbaum M, Kubiak T, Haak T. How to screen for depression and emotional problems in patients with diabetes: comparison of screening characteristics of depression questionnaires, measurement of diabetes-specific emotional problems and standard clinical assessment. Diabetologia 2006; 49: 469-477.
6. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J, Dudl RJ, Lees J, Mullan J et al. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 626-631.
7. Fisher L, Skaff MM, Mullan JT, Arean P, Mohr D, Masharani U et al. Clinical depression versus distress among patients with Type 2 diabetes: not just a question of semantics. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 542-548.
8. Gonzalez JS, Fisher L, Polonsky WH. Depression in diabetes: have we been missing something important? Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 236-239.
9. Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Mullan JT, Skaff MM, Polonsky WH. Development of a brief diabetes distress screening instrument. Ann Fam Med 2008; 6: 246-252.
10. Fisher L, Hessler DM, Polonsky WH, Mullan J. When is diabetes distress clinically meaningful?: establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 259-264.
11. Graue M, Haugstvedt A, Wentzel-Larsen T, Iversen MM, Karlsen B, Rokne B. Diabetes-related emotional distress in adults: reliability and validity of the Norwegian versions of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). Int J Nurs Stud 2012; 49: 174-182.
12. Polonsky WH, Anderson BJ, Lohrer PA, Welch G, Jacobson AM, Aponte JE et al. Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care 1995; 18: 754-760.
13. Amsberg S, Wredling R, Lins PE, Adamson U, Johansson UB. The psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (Swe-PAID-20): scale development. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45: 1319-1328.
14. Huis In 't Veld EM, Makine C, Nouwen A, Karsidag C, Kadioglu P, Karsidag K et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the problem areas in diabetes scale. Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol 2011; 2011: doi:10.1155/2011/315086.
15. Papathanasiou A, Koutsovasilis A, Shea S, Philalithis A, Papavasiliou S, Melidonis A et al. The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale: psychometric evaluation survey in a Greek sample with Type 2 diabetes. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2012; doi:10.1111/j.1356-2850.2012.01875.x. [Epub ahead of print].
16. Sigurdardottir AK, Benediktsson R. Reliability and validity of the Icelandic version of the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) Scale. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45: 526-533.
17. Snoek FJ, Pouwer F, Welch GW, Polonsky WH. Diabetes-related emotional distress in Dutch and US diabetic patients: cross-cultural validity of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 1305-1309.
18. Ting RZ, Nan H, Yu MW, Kong AP, Ma RC, Wong RY et al. Diabetes-related distress and physical and psychological health in chinese Type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 1094-1096.
19. Anderson R. The Diabetes Empowerment Scale: a measure of psychosocial self-efficacy. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 739-743.
20. Anderson RM, Fitzgerald JT, Gruppen LD, Funnell MM, Oh MS. The diabetes empowerment scale-short form (DES-SF) [8]. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 1641-1642.
21. Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bjorner JB, Brazier JE et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1171-1178.
22. Harper A, Power M, Orley J, Herrman H, Schofield H, Murphy B et al. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment. Psychol Med 1998; 28: 551-558.
23. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 943-950.
24. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34-42.
25. Maindal HT, Sokolowski I, Vedsted P. Adaptation, data quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish version of the PACIC questionnaire. Eur J Public Health 2012; 22: 31-36.
26. Streiner D, Norman G. Selecting the Items. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Developement and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
27. SAS/STAT(R) 9.2. User's Guide. 2nd edition. Principal Factor Analysis. Available at http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_factor_sect029.htm. Last accessed 31 January 2012.
28. Hatcher L. Developing Measurement Models with Confirmatory Factor Analysis. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modelling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1994a: 249-340.
29. Hatcher L. Steps in Conduction Exploratory Factor Analysis. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modelling. SAS Institute, 1994b: 79-107.
30. Wang RH, Wu LC, Hsu HY. A path model of health-related quality of life in Type 2 diabetic patients: a cross-sectional study in Taiwan. J Adv Nurs 2011; 67: 2658-2667.