Adaptation, data quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish version of the PACIC questionnaire

European Journal of Public Health

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 31-36

  Maindal, Helle Terkildsen ^a   Sokolowski, Ineta ^a   Vedsted, Peter ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DENMARK; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DENMARK; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84856450069     PISSN: 11011262     EISSN: 1464360X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq188     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Glasgow RE, Whitesides H, Nelson CC, King DK. Use of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) with diabetic patients: relationship to patient characteristics, receipt of care, and self-management. Diabetes Care 2005;28:2655-61. (Pubitemid 43951155)
2. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA 2002;288:1909-14. (Pubitemid 35168149)
3. Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, et al. Development and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC). Medical Care 2005;43:436-44. (Pubitemid 40694603)
4. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, et al. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff 2001;20:64-78. (Pubitemid 33707442)
5. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA 2002;288:1775-9.
6. National Board of health. Chronic Disease Management: a nationale strategy. Disease management Programmes and self-management support. Copenhagen, 2007.
7. Szecsenyi J, Rosemann T, Joos S, et al. German diabetes disease management programs are appropriate for restructuring care according to the chronic care model: an evaluation with the patient assessment of chronic illness care instrument. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1150-4.
8. Wensing M, van LJ, Jung HP, et al. The Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire in The Netherlands: a validation study in rural general practice. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:182.
9. Aragones A, Schaefer EW, Stevens D, et al. Validation of the Spanish translation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) survey. Prev Chronic Dis 2008;5:A113.
10. Gugiu PC, Coryn C, Clark R, Kuehn A. Development and evaluation of the short version of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument. Chronic Illness 2009;5:268-76.
11. Kristensen JK, Drivsholm TB, Carstensen B, et al. [Validation of methods to identify known diabetes on the basis of health registers]. Ugeskr Laeger 2007;169:1687-92.
12. Drivsholm TB, Frederiksen K, de Fine ON, et al. [The prevalence of diabetes in Denmark Development of a method for a registry-based assessment]. Ugeskr Laeger 2003;165:2887-91.
13. World Health organization. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments, WHO 2007. Available at: www.who.int/substance-abuse/research tools/translation/en/index.html (22 November 2010, date last accessed).
14. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health 2005;8:94-104. (Pubitemid 40525371)
15. Willis GB. Cognitive interview: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2005.
16. Vedsted P, Sokolowski I, Heje HN. Data quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish EUROPEP questionnaire on patient evaluation of general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 2008;26:174-80.
17. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus users guide, 5th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén, 2007.
18. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995;4:293-307.
19. McDowell I. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2006.
20. Sitzia J. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care 1999;11:319-28. (Pubitemid 29395018)
21. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
22. Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:945-52. (Pubitemid 28527149)
23. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of Life. Assessment, analysis and interpretation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2007.
24. McDonald RP, Ho MH. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol Methods 2002;7:64-82.
25. Muthén B, Kaplan D. A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non normal Likert variables. Br J Math Stat Psycol 1985;38:171-89.
26. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990;107:238-46.
27. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 1999;6:1-55.
28. The MacColl Institute for Health Care Innovation. The MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation at the Group Health Center for Health Studies is the home of Improving Chronic Illness Care (ICIC). 2007. Available at: www.improvingchroniccare.org (22 November 2010, date last accessed).
29. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Bouter LM. Current challenges in clinimetrics. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:1137-41. (Pubitemid 37532797)
30. Boyd CM, Reider L, Frey K, et al. The effects of guided care on the perceived quality of health care for multi-morbid older persons: 18-month outcomes from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:235-42.
31. Spicer J, Budge C, Carryer J. Taking the PACIC back to basics: the structure of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care. J Eval Clin Pract 2010 [Epub ahead of print, 25 October].
32. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:737-45.
33. Vrijhoef HJ, Berbee R, Wagner EH, Steuten LM. Quality of integrated chronic care measured by patient survey: identification, selection and application of most appropriate instruments. Health Expect 2009;12:417-29.