The effects of protoype medium on usability testing

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1033-1038

  Boothe, Chase ^a   Strawderman, Lesley ^a   Hosea, Ethan ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fidelity; Human computer interaction; Perception; Prototype; Usability

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; SENSORY PERCEPTION; TESTING;

FIDELITY; LOW FIDELITIES; PROTOTYPE; RESEARCH FRAMEWORKS; USABILITY; USABILITY PROBLEMS; USABILITY TESTING; USERS' PERCEPTION;

USABILITY ENGINEERING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; ERGONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; PERCEPTION; PROCESS DESIGN; USABILITY;

FIDELITY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; PERCEPTION; PROTOTYPE; USABILITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER TERMINALS; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PAPER; PERCEPTION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84882569502     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: 18729126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Catani M.B., Biers D.W. Usability evaluation and prototype fidelity: users and usability professionals. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting 1998, 1331-1335. SAGE.
2. Hall R.R. Usability and product design: a case study. Human Factors in Product Design: Current Practice and Future Trends 1999, 85-91. Taylor & Francis, London. W.S. Green, P.W. Jordan (Eds.).
3. Lewis J.R. Psychometric evaluation of the post-study system usability questionnaire: the PSSUQ. Proceedings of the Human Factors Soceity 36th Annual Meeting 1992, 1259-1263. Human Factors Society, Santa Monica.
4. Lewis J.R. Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five yearsof usability studies. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction 2002, 463-488.
5. Nielsen J. Paper versus computer implementations as mockup scenarios for heuristic evaluation. Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 Third Interational Conferenceon Human-computer Interaction 1990, 315-320. North-Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam.
6. Säde S., Nieminen M., Riihiaho S. Testing usability with 3D paper prototypes - case Halton system. Applied Ergonomics 1998, 67-73.
7. Sauer J., Sibel K., Rüttinger B. The influence of user expertise and prototype fidelity in usability tests. Applied Ergonomics 2010, 130-140.
8. Sefelin R., Tscheligi M., Giller V. Paper prototyping - what is it good for? A comparison of paper- and computer-based low-fidelity prototyping. Proceedings of CHI 2003, 778-779. ACM, New York.
9. Virzi R.A., Sokolov J.L., Karis D. Usability problem identification using both low- and high-fidelity prototypes. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1996, 236-243. ACM, New York.
10. Walker M., Takayama L., Landay J.A. High-fidelity or low-fidelity, paper or computer? Choosing attributes when testing web prototypes. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2002, 661-665.