The thematic and conceptual flow of disciplinary research: A citation context analysis of the journal of informetrics, 2007

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 64, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1903-1913

  Halevi, Gali ^a   Moed, Henk F ^a  

^a ELSEVIER MASSON   (France)

Author keywords

bibliometrics

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRICS; CITATION CONTEXT ANALYSIS; CROSS-DISCIPLINARY; FIRST YEAR; INFORMETRICS; LITERATURE REVIEWS; THEMATIC ANALYSIS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84882451864     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.22897     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Boyack, K.W., &, Klavans, R., (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (12), 2389-2404.
2. Chubin, D.E, &, Moitra, S., (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5, 423-441.
3. Cole, S., (1983). The hierarchy of the sciences? The American Journal of Sociology, 89 (1), 111-139.
4. Frost, C.O., (1979). The use of citations in literary research: A preliminary classification of citation functions. Library Quarterly, 49, 399-441.
5. Hooten, P.A., (1991). Frequency and functional use of cited documents in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 397-404.
6. Latour, B., &, Woolgar, S., (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7. Lipetz, B., (1965). Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science literature through inclusion of citation relationship indicators. American Documentation, 16, 81-90.
8. Maricic, S., Spaventi, J., Pavicic, L., &, Pifat-Mrzljak, G., (1998). Citation context versus the frequency counts of citation histories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 530-540.
9. McCain, K.W., (2011). Eponymy and obliteration by incorporation: The case of the "Nash Equilibrium." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (7), 1412-1424.
10. Moravcsik, M.J., &, Murugesan, P., (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5, 86-92
11. Oppenheim, C., &, Renn, S.P., (1978). Highly cited papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 29, 225-231.
12. Peritz, B., (1983). A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields. Scientometrics, 5, 303-312.
13. Small, H., (1982). Citation context analysis. In, B. Dervin, &, M.J. Voight, (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences, vol. III. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. pp. 287-310.
14. Small, H., &, Klavans R., (2011). Identifying scientific breakthroughs by combining co-citation analysis and citation context. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 13th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI2011).
15. Spiegel-Rosing, I., (1977). Science studies: Bibliometric and content analysis. Social Studies of Science, 7, 97-113.
16. White, H.D., (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 87-108.