Would patient ownership of health data improve confidentiality?

Virtual Mentor

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 724-732

  Evans, Barbara J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; ETHICS; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

CONFIDENTIALITY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT; HUMANS; OWNERSHIP; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84882272385     PISSN: 19377010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.9.pfor1-1209     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Nass SJ, Levit LA, Gostin LO eds.; Institute of Medicine Committee on Health Research and the Privacy of Health Info. Beyond The HIPAA Privacy Rule: Enhancing Privacy, Improving Health Through Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12458.html. Accessed August 8, 2012.
2. Ram N. Assigning rights and protecting interests: constructing ethical and efficient rights in human tissue research. Harvard J Law Tech. 2009;23(1):141.
3. Evans BJ. Much ado about data ownership. Harvard J Law Tech. 2012;25(1):69-130.
4. Rodwin MA. Patient data: property, privacy & the public interest. Am J Law Med. 2010;36(4):586-618.
5. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Pub L No 104-191, 110 Stat 1936
6. Office for Human Research Protections. Guidance on research involving coded private information or biological specimens; Oct. 16, 2008. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/cdebiol.html. Accessed July 15, 2012.
7. Advanced notice of proposed rulemaking: human subjects research protections: enhancing protections for research subjects and reducing burden, delay, and ambiguity for investigators. Fed Regist. 2011;76:44512-44531.
8. https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/07/26/2011-18792/human-subjects-research-protections-enhancing-protections-for-research-subjects- and-reducing-burden. Accessed August 9, 2012.
9. HHS. Fed Regist. 2011;76:44518-44521.
10. HHS, Fed Regist. 2011;76:44527, table 1
11. Proposal for the excused category of research involving pre-existing information or biospecimens. https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/07/26/2011-18792/human-subjects-research-protections-enhancing-protections-for-research-subjects- and-reducing-burden#t-1. Accessed August 9, 2012.
12. HHS. Fed Regist. 2011;76:44523-44525.
13. HHS. Fed Regist. 2011;76:44521
14. HHS. Fed Regist. 2011;76:44519.
15. HHS. Fed Regist. 2011;76:44523.
16. Evans BJ. Ethical and privacy issues in pharmacogenomic research. In: Macleod HL, ed. Pharmacogenomics: Applications to Patient Care. 2nd ed. Lenexa, KS: American College of Clinical Pharmacy; 2009:313-338.
17. Merrill TW. The economics of public use. Cornell Law Rev. 1986;72:61-116.
18. Calabresi G, Melamed AD. Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability: one view of the cathedral. Harvard Law Rev. 1972;85(6):1089-1128.
19. Claeys ER. Takings, regulations, and natural property rights. Cornell Law Rev. 2003;88(6):1549-1671.
20. Hart JF. Land use law in the early republic and the original meaning of the takings clause. Northwestern Univ Law Rev. 2000;94:1099-1156.
21. Hall MA. Property, privacy, and the pursuit of interconnected electronic medical records. Iowa Law Rev. 2010;95(2):631-663.
22. Parmet WE. After September 11: rethinking public health federalism. J Law Med Ethics. 2002;30(2):201-211.
23. Amoroso PJ, Middaugh JP. Research vs. public health practice: when does a study require IRB review? Preventive Med. 2003;36:250-253.
24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIPAA privacy rule and public health. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:1-20. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/other/m2e411.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2012.
25. Snider DE Jr, Stroup DF. Defining research when it comes to public health. Pub Health Rep. 1997;112(1): 29-32.
26. Hodge JG, Gostin LO. Public health practice vs. research. Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists; 2004:7. http://www.cste.org/pdffiles/newpdffiles/CSTEPHResRptHodgeFinal.5.24.04 .pdf. Accessed July 15, 2012.
27. Hodge JG. An enhanced approach to distinguishing public health practice and human subjects research. J Law Med Ethics. 2005;33(1):125-140.
28. Armstrong v United States, 364 US 40, 49 (1960).
29. Bell A, Parchomovsky G. The hidden function of takings compensation. Virginia Law Rev. 2010;96:1673-1725.
30. Casarett D, Karlawish J, Andrews E, Caplan A. Bioethical issues in pharmacoepidemiologic research. In: Strom BL, ed. Pharmacoepidemiology. 4th ed. Chicester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2005: 597.
31. Jacobson PD. Medical records and HIPAA: is it too late to protect privacy? Minn Law Rev. 2002;86(6):1497-1514.