Application of principal component analysis in clinical gait research: Identification of systematic differences between healthy and medial knee-osteoarthritic gait

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 46, Issue 13, 2013, Pages 2173-2178

  Federolf, P A ^a,b   Boyer, K A ^a,c,e   Andriacchi, T P ^a,c,d  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF SPORT SCIENCES   (Norway)

^c VA PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Bernstein's degree of freedom problem; Kinematics; Locomotion; Principal component analysis PCA; Small sample size

Indexed keywords

DEGREE OF FREEDOM; DISCRIMINANT VECTORS; GROUND REACTION FORCES; INTERNAL CONSTRAINTS; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MOTOR CONTROL SYSTEM; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT; SMALL SAMPLE SIZE;

BIOPHYSICS; BIPED LOCOMOTION; KINEMATICS;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY MOVEMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FORCE; GAIT DISORDER; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; LINEAR SYSTEM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE SIZE; SCORING SYSTEM; WEIGHT BEARING;

EID: 84882266719     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.06.032     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andriacchi T.P., Alexander E.J., Toney M.K., Dyrby C., Sum J. A point cluster method for in vivo motion analysis: applied to a study of knee kinematics. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1998, 120:743-749.
2. Astephen Wilson J.L., Deluzio K.J., Dunbar M.J., Caldwell G.E., Hubley-Kozey C.L. The association between knee joint biomechanics and neuromuscular control and moderate knee osteoarthritis radiographic and pain severity. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2011, 19:186-193.
3. Astephen J.L., Deluzio K.J. Changes in frontal plane dynamics and the loading response phase of the gait cycle are characteristic of severe knee osteoarthritis application of a multidimensional analysis technique. Clinical Biomechanics 2005, 20:209-217.
4. Astephen J.L., Deluzio K.J., Caldwell G.E., Dunbar M.J., Hubley-Kozey C.L. Gait and neuromuscular pattern changes are associated with differences in knee osteoarthritis severity levels. Journal of Biomechanics 2008, 41:868-876.
5. Bartlett R., Wheat J., Robins M. Is movement variability important for sports biomechanists?. Sports Biomechanics 2007, 6:224-243.
6. Bernstein N.A. The Coordination and Regulation of Movements 1967, Pergamon Press, London.
7. Black D., Smith B., Wu J., Ulrich B. Uncontrolled manifold analysis of segmental angle variability during walking: preadolescents with and without Down syndrome. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 183:511-521.
8. Boyer K.A., Federolf P., Lin C., Nigg B.M., Andriacchi T.P. Kinematic adaptations to a variable stiffness shoe: mechanisms for reducing joint loading. Journal of Biomechanics 2012, 45:1619-1624.
9. Boyer K.A., Angst M.S., Asay J., Giori N.J., Andriacchi T.P. Sensitivity of gait parameters to the effects of anti-inflammatory and opioid treatments in knee osteoarthritis patients. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 2012, 30:1118-1124.
10. Brandon S.C.E., Deluzio K.J. Robust features of knee osteoarthritis in joint moments are independent of reference frame selection. Clinical Biomechanics 2011, 26:65-70.
11. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 112:155-159.
12. Daffertshofer A., Lamoth C.J.C., Meijer O.G., Beek P.J. PCA in studying coordination and variability: a tutorial. Clinical Biomechanics 2004, 19:415-428.
13. Davis R.B. Reflections on clinical gait analysis. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 1997, 7:251-257.
14. Decker L.M., Cignetti F., Potter J.F., Studenski S.A., Stergiou N. Use of motor abundance in young and older adults during dual-task treadmill walking. PloS one 2012, 7:e41306.
15. Deluzio K.J., Astephen J.L. Biomechanical features of gait waveform data associated with knee osteoarthritis: an application of principal component analysis. Gait and Posture 2007, 25:86-93.
16. Deluzio K.J., Wyss U.P., Zee B., Costigan P.A., Serbie C. Principal component models of knee kinematics and kinetics: normal vs. pathological gait patterns. Human Movement Science 1997, 16:201-217.
17. Dingwell J.B., John J., Cusumano J.P. Do humans optimally exploit redundancy to control step variability in walking?. PLoS Computational Biology 2010, 6:e1000856.
18. Eskofier B.M., Federolf P., Kugler P.F., Nigg B.M. Marker-based classification of young-elderly gait pattern differences via direct PCA feature extraction and SVMs. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 2013, 16:435-442.
19. Federolf P., Reid R., Gilgien M., Haugen P. Smith G., The application of principal component analysis to quantify technique in sports. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, , in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01455.x.
20. Federolf P., Tecante K., Nigg B. A holistic approach to study the temporal variability in gait. Journal of Biomechanics 2012, 45:1127-1132.
21. Federolf P.A., Roos L., Nigg B. The effect of footwear on postural control in bipedal quiet stance. Footwear Science 2012, 4:115-122.
22. Huang S.C., Wei I.P., Chien H.L., Wang T.M., Liu Y.H., Chen H.L., Lu T.W., Lin J.G. Effects of severity of degeneration on gait patterns in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Medical Engineering & Physics 2008, 30:997-1003.
23. Hunt M.A., Birmingham T.B., Bryant D., Jones I., Giffin J.R., Jenkyn T.R., Vandervoort A.A. Lateral trunk lean explains variation in dynamic knee joint load in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2008, 16:591-599.
24. Kang N., Shinohara M., Zatsiorsky V.M., Latash M.L. Learning multi-finger synergies: an uncontrolled manifold analysis. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 157:336-350.
25. Kim S., Fung V.S.C. Unusual gait disorders. Uncommon Causes of Movement Disorders 2011, 185-197. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. N. Gálvez-Jiménez, P. Tuite (Eds.).
26. Kristianslund E., Krosshaug T., van den Bogert A.J. Effect of low pass filtering on joint moments from inverse dynamics: implications for injury prevention. Journal of Biomechanics 2012, 45:666-671.
27. Landry S.C., McKean K.A., Hubley-Kozey C.L., Stanish W.D., Deluzio K.J. Knee biomechanics of moderate OA patients measured during gait at a self-selected and fast walking speed. Journal of Biomechanics 2007, 40:1754-1761.
28. Latash M.L., Scholz J.P., Schöner G. Toward a new theory of motor synergies. Motor Control 2007, 11:276-308.
29. Latash M.L. Stages in learning motor synergies: a view based on the equilibrium-point hypothesis. Human Movement Science 2010, 29:642-654.
30. Latash M.L., Scholz J.P., Schöner G. Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 2002, 30:26-31.
31. Mündermann A., Asay J.L., Mündermann L., Andriacchi T.P. Implications of increased medio-lateral trunk sway for ambulatory mechanics. Journal of Biomechanics 2008, 41:165-170.
32. Mündermann A., Dyrby C.O., Andriacchi T.P. Secondary gait changes in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: increased load at the ankle, knee, and hip during walking. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2005, 52:2835-2844.
33. Maurer C., Federolf P., von Tscharner V., Stirling L., Nigg B.M. Discrimination of gender-, speed-, and shoe-dependent movement patterns in runners using full-body kinematics. Gait & Posture 2012, 36:40-45.
34. Nigg B.M. Biomechanics of Sport Shoes 2010, Topline Printing Inc., Calgary, AB, Canada.
35. Nigg B.M., Baltich J., Maurer C., Federolf P. Shoe midsole hardness, sex and age effects on lower extremity kinematics during running. Journal of Biomechanics 2012, 45:1692-1697.
36. Scholz J.P., Schöner G. The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Experimental Brain Research 1999, 126:289-306.
37. Schoner G. Recent developments and problems in human movement science and their conceptual implications. Ecological Psychology 1995, 7:291-314.
38. Stergiou N., Harbourne R.T., Cavanaugh J.T. Optimal movement variability: a new theoretical perspective for neurologic physical therapy. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 2006, 30:120-129.
39. Todorov E. Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7:907-915.
40. Todorov E., Jordan M.I. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:1226-1235.
41. Troje N.F. Decomposing biological motion: a framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision 2002, 2:371-387.
42. Winter D.A. Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: variability and compensating effects. Human Movement Science 1984, 3:51-76.
43. Witte K., Ganter N., Baumgart C., Peham C. Applying a principal component analysis to movement coordination in sport. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems 2010, 16:477-488.