Political economy, media, and climate change: Sinews of modern life

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 359-371

  Boykoff, Maxwell T ^a   Yulsman, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DIGITAL STORAGE; ECONOMICS; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

DIGITAL INNOVATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS; MEDIA REPRESENTATION; ORGANIZATIONAL FORMS; POLITICAL ECONOMY; SCIENTIFIC ISSUES; WATER QUANTITIES;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; INNOVATION; MASS MEDIA; PERCEPTION; POLITICAL ECONOMY; TWENTY FIRST CENTURY;

EID: 84882255968     PISSN: 17577780     EISSN: 17577799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.233     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Simon D. The Wire, HBO, 2002-2008.
2. Bridge G. Past peak oil: political economy of energy crises. In: Peet R, Robbins P, Watts M, eds. Global Political Ecology. London: Routledge; 2011, 307-324.
3. Broder J. In glare of climate talks, taking on too great a task, New York Times, December 2009.
4. Crutzen PJ. The anthropocene. J Phys IV France 2002, 10:1-5.
5. Revkin A. Global Warming: Understanding the Forecast. New York: American Museum of Natural History, Environmental Defense Fund, and Abbeville Press; 1992, 176.
6. IPCC. 2.4 Attribution of climate change. In IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: climate Change, 2.4 Attribution of climate change, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Reisinger A, eds.). Geneva: IPCC, 2007, 104pp. Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/syr/en/mains2-4.html.
7. 2 emissions after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis. Nat Clim Change 2012, 2:2-4.
8. Tans P. Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide, national oceanic and atmospheric administration. Available at: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/. (Accessed April 4, 2013).
9. Global Carbon Project Carbon Budget: Media Summary Highlights (compact) 2012. Available at: http://www.globalcarbonproject.org/carbonbudget/10/hl-compact.htm. (Accessed February 15, 2012).
10. Nelkin D. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1987, 217.
11. Antilla L. Self-censorship and science: a geographical review of media coverage of climate tipping points. Public Understand Sci 2010, 19:240-256.
12. Boykoff M. From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Trans Inst Br Geogr 2007, 32:477-489.
13. Trahant M. Truth a higher calling than fairness, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, November 12, 2005.
14. Schneider SH. Science as a Contact Sport: Inside the Battle to Save Earth's Climate. Washington, DC: National Geographic; 2009, 304.
15. Kovach B, Rosenstiel T. The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. New York: Three Rivers Press; 2001, 205.
16. Cunningham B. Re-thinking objectivity, Columbia Journalism Review, July/August 2005, 24-32.
17. A Free and Responsible Press. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1947, 162.
18. Peters HP, Brossard D, de Cheveigné S, Dunwoody S, Kallfass M, Miller S, Tsuchida S. Science-media interface: it's time to reconsider. Sci Commun 2008, 30:266-276.
19. Noam EM. Media Ownership and Concentration in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
20. Doctor K.The newsonomics of U.S. media concentration, Niemann Journalism Lab, 2011. Available at: http://www.niemanlab.org/2011/07/the-newsonomics-of-u-s-media-concentration/. (Accessed 28 April 2013)
21. Curran J. Media and Power. London: Routledge; 2002, 320.
22. Herman ES, Chomsky N. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Toronto, CA: Pantheon Books; 1988, 480.
23. Bagdikian BH. The New Media Monopoly. Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 2004, 299.
24. McChesney RW. Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press; 1999, 448.
25. Carvalho A. Representing the politics of the greenhouse effect. Crit Discourse Stud 2005, 2:1-29.
26. Frank L. The Withering Watchdog, Part One Exposé: America's Investigative Reports 2009. Available at: http://www.pbs.org/wnet/expose/2009/06/the-withering-watchdog.html#employment. (Accessed 9 March 2013)
27. Project for Excellence in Journalism. The Changing Newsroom: What is Being Gained and What is Being Lost in America's Daily Newspapers? Available at: http://www.journalism.org/files/PEJ-The%20Changing%20Newspaper%20Newsroom%20FINAL%20DRAFT-NOEMBARGO-PDF.pdf. (Accessed 3 May 2013)
28. Brumfiel G. Science journalism: supplanting the old media? Nature 2009, 458:274-277.
29. Project for Excellence in Journalism: The State of the News Media 2013. Available at: http://stateofthemedia.org. (Accessed March 20, 2013).
30. Russell C. Covering Controversial Science: Improving Reporting on Science and Public Policy, Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, #2006-4. Available at: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/publications/papers/working_papers/2006_04_russell.pdf. (Accessed March 20, 2013).
31. Anderson A. Media, Culture and the Environment. London: Routledge; 1997, 240.
32. Boykoff M. A discernible human influence on the COP15? Considering the role of media in shaping ongoing climate science, Copenhagen Climate Congress 2009, Theme 6, Session 53.
33. Luft O. First it was revenues, now it's jobs, Guardian, November 17, 2008, M1-2.
34. Ward B. Reporter Revkin's 'worst misstep': aftermath of a climate reporting gaffe, Yale Forum on Climate Change and the Media, May 5, 2009.
35. Revkin A. Industry ignored its scientists on climate, New York Times, April 24, 2009, A1.
36. Williams A, Clifford C. Mapping the field: specialist science news journalism in the UK national media, Cardiff University Report, 2009.
37. Davies N. Churnalism has taken the place of what we should be doing', Press Gazzette, February 4, 2008. Available at: http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/40117. (Accessed April 3, 2013).
38. Mitchell A, Rosenstiel T. Overview, Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism, The State of the News Media 2012. Available at: http://stateofthemedia.org/2012/overview-4. (Accessed 28 April 2013)
39. World Federation of Science Journalists. Available at: http://www.wfsj.org/about. (Accessed May 3, 2012).
40. Russell C. Some optimism for the future of science journalism, The Observatory, 2009. Available at: http://www.cjr.org/the_observatory/some_optimism_for_the_future_o.php. (Accessed 9 March 2013)
41. O'Neill SJ, Boykoff M. The role of new media in engaging the public with climate change. In: Whitmarsh L, O'Neill SJ, Lorenzoni I, eds. Engaging the Public with Climate Change: Communication and Behaviour Change. London: Earthscan; 2010, 233-251.
42. Brainard C. All thumbs, none green, Columbia Journalism Review: The Observatory, 2013. Available at: http://www.cjr.org/the_observatory/new_york_times_environment_cov.php. (Accessed March 20, 2013).
43. Weinger M. WaPo announces 'online strike force', staff changes, Politico, 2013. Available at: http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/03/wapo-announces-an-online-strike-force-staff-changes-158379.html. (Accessed March 20, 2013).
44. Doyle G. Media Ownership: The Economics and Politics of Convergence and Concentration in the UK and European Media. London: Sage Publications; 2002, 192.
45. Investigative News Network. 2012. Available at: http://www.investigativenewsnetwork.org/about/about-inn. (Accessed May 15, 2012).
46. Spencer M. Environmental journalism in the greenhouse era, FAIR Extra! February 2010.
47. Halpert J. Nonprofit journalism model: a future of environmental reporting? Yale Forum on Climate Change and the Media, September 15, 2009.
48. Picard RG. Why journalists deserve low pay, presentation to Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, RISJ Seminar Series, University of Oxford, May 6, 2009.
49. Jones AS. Losing the News: The Future of the News That Feeds Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009, 256.
50. Carvalho A. Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public Underst Sci 2007, 16:223-243.
51. Burgess J. Follow the argument where it leads: some personal reflections on 'policy-relevant' research. Trans Inst Br Geogr 2005, 30:273.
52. Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon NF. Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Clim Change 2006, 77(1/2):73-95.
53. Jasanoff S. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2005, 392.
54. Thacker PD. Climate change and American exceptionalism. Environ Sci Technol 2077, 2006:40.
55. Columbia Journalism Review. Brits vs. Yanks: who does journalism right? Columbia Journalism Review May/June 2004, 44-49.
56. Boykoff M, Rajan SR. Signals and noise: mass-media coverage of climate change in the USA and the UK. Eur Mol Biol Org Rep 2007, 8:1-5.
57. Tunstall J. The Media Were American: U.S. Mass Media in Decline. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007, 280.
58. Pooley E. How much would you pay to save the planet? The American press and the economics of climate change, Discussion Paper Series #D-49. Joan Shorenstein Center for Press, Politics, Public Policy, Kennedy School, Harvard University, 2009.
59. Boykoff MT. Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Mass Media Reporting on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011, 240.
60. National Aeronautics and Space Administration GISS Surface Temperature Analysis. Available at: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2007. (Accessed February 29, 2012).
61. Tyndall Decade in Review. Available at: http://tyndallreport.com/decadeinreview. (Accessed February 29, 2012).
62. IPCC. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation (Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Dahe Q, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner G, Allen SK et al, eds.) A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press; 2012, 1-19.
63. Project for Improved Environmental Coverage Environmental Coverage in the Mainstream News: We Need More, An Inaugural Ranking Report, January 2013. Available at: http://environmentalcoverage.org. (Accessed March 20, 2013).
64. Quinn K. Courting the great gray lady, Lingua Franca, April/May 1992, 27-29.
65. Boykoff M, Boykoff J. Climate change and journalistic norms: a case-study of U.S. mass-media coverage. Geoforum 2007, 38:1190-1204.
66. Boykoff M. Public enemy no.1? Understanding media representations of outlier views on climate change. Am Behav Sci 2013, 57:796-817. doi: 10.1177/0002764213476846.
67. Quart A. The trouble with experts, Columbia Journalism Review, July/August 2010, 17-18.
68. Hilgartner S, Bosk CL. The rise and fall of social problems: a public arenas model. Am J Sociol 1988, 94:53-78.
69. Boykoff M, Goodman MK, Curtis I. Cultural politics of climate change: interactions in everyday spaces. In: Boykoff M, ed. The Politics of Climate Change: A Survey. London: Routledge/Europa; 2009, 136-154.
70. Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Lowe L, Visser PS. The origins and consequences of democratic citizens' policy agendas: a study of popular concern about global warming. Clim Change 2006, 77:7-43.
71. O'Neill S, Boykoff M, Day SA, Niemeyer S. On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Global Environ Change 2013, 23:413-421. doi: org/10.1016/ j.gloenvcha.2012.11.006.
72. Boykoff M. The cultural politics of climate change discourse in UK tabloids. Polit Geogr 2008, 27:549-569.
73. Foucault M. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon; 1980, 288.
74. Nisbet MC, Hixon MA, Moore KD, Nelson M. Four cultures: new synergies for engaging society on climate change. Front Ecol Environ 2010, 8:329-331.
75. Revkin AC. Climate change as news: challenges in communicating environmental science. In: DiMento JFC, ed. Climate Change: What it Means for us, our Children, and our Grandchildren. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007, 139-160.
76. Brainard C. Mediaphobia at the IPCC, The Observatory-Columbia Journalism Review, July 12, 2010.
77. Curtis K. Background and tips for responding to the media. Media Backgrounder for Working Group 2, Resource Media, April 2010.
78. Revkin AC. 2010 Climate panel struggles with media plan Dot Earth, The New York Times, July 10, 2010.