The continued movement for open access to peer-reviewed literature

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 156, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 423-432

  Liesegang, Thomas J ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; AUTHOR; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; ENVIRONMENT; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MODEL; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84882242100     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: 18791891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.04.033     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Directory of Elsevier open access journals. Available at http://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-journals. Accessed April 27, 2013.
2. B.C. Bjork, P. Welling, M. Laakso, P. Majlender, T. Hedlund, and G. Gudnason Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009 PLoS One 5 6 2010 e11273
3. J. Kaiser Free journals grow amid ongoing debate Science 329 5994 2010 896 898
4. G.J. Gores Open access journals: why are we not there yet? (!) Hepatology 52 6 2010 1869 1871
5. Crossref.org. History/mission. Available at http://www.crossref.org/ 01company/02history.html. Accessed April 27, 2013.
6. A.J. Wolpert For the sake of inquiry and knowledge - the inevitability of open access N Engl J Med 368 9 2013 785 787
7. H.F. Dylla One publisher's journey through the public access debate Inf Serv Use 32 1-2 2012 65 78
8. Ware M, Mabe M. The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journals publishing. STM, 2009. Oxford: STM: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers; 2009. Available at http://www.stm-assoc.org/2009-10-13-MWC-STM-Report.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2013.
9. M. Frank Open but not free-publishing in the 21st century N Engl J Med 368 9 2013 787 789
10. B.A. Nosek, and Y. Bar-Anan Scientific Utopia: I. Opening scientific communication Psychol Inq 23 3 2012 217 243
11. Academic publishing. Open sesame. The Economist. April 14, 2012. Available at http://www.economist.com/node/21552574. Accessed April 27, 2013.
12. R. Van Noorden Open access: the true cost of science publishing Nature 495 7442 2013 426 429
13. A. Kirby Scientific communication, open access, and the publishing industry Polit Geogr 31 2012 256 259
14. D. Goodstein How science works National Research Council reference manual on scientific evidence 3rd ed. 2011 The National Academies Press Washington, DC 37 54
15. R. Kenney, and R. Warden An Open Access future? Report from the eurocancercoms project Ecancermedicalscience 5 2011 223
16. M.W. Carroll Creative Commons and the openness of open access N Engl J Med 368 9 2013 789 791
17. Budapest Open Access Initiative. Available at http://www. opensocietyfoundations.org/openaccess/read. Accessed April 1, 2013.
18. Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing. Available at http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4725199/suber-bethesda.htm?sequence= 1. Accessed April 27, 2013.
19. Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. Available at http://www.zim.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/berlin- declaration.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2013.
20. M. Laakso, P. Welling, H. Bukvova, L. Nyman, B.-C. Bjork, and T. Hedlund The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009 PLoS One 6 6 2011 e20961
21. DOAJ -; Directory of open access journals. Available at http://www.doaj.org/. Accessed April 27, 2013.
22. Y. Gargouri, C. Hajjem, and V. Larivière Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research PLoS One 5 10 2010 e13636
23. BioMed Central: an open access publisher. Available at http://www.biomedcentral.com/. Accessed April 27, 2013.
24. Public Library of Science. Available at http://www.plos.org/. Accessed April 27, 2013.
25. M. Laakso, and B.C. Björk Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure BMC Med 10 2012 124
26. HighWirePress. Available at http://highwire.stanford.edu/. Accessed April 27, 2013.
27. Elsevier: open access publishing. Available at http://www.elsevier.com/ about/open-access/open-access-options. Accessed April 27, 2013.
28. M.W. Carroll Why full open access matters PLoS Biol 9 11 2011 e1001210
29. bij de Weg, J. Open access and Creative Commons - are they separable? Available at http://editorsupdate.elsevier.com/2012/03/open-access-and-creative- commons-%E2%80%93-are-they-separable/ 19 Mar 2012. Accessed April 27, 2013.
30. Open Access Overview. Available at http://legacy.earlham.edu/∼peters/ fos/overview.htm. Accessed April 27, 2013.
31. Open access publishing. Available at www.elsevier.com/openaccess. Accessed April 27, 2013.
32. C. Neylon Science publishing: open access must enable open use Nature 492 7429 2012 348 349
33. Elsevier at a glance. Available at http://www.elsevier.com/about/at-a- glance. Accessed April 27, 2013.
34. Elsevier access initiatives. Available at http://www.elsevier.com/about/ universal-access/access-initiatives. Accessed April 27, 2013.
35. Elsevier submission to Office of Science and Technology Policy public consultation on Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications Resulting from Federally Funded Research January, 2012. Available at http://cdn.elsevier. com/assets/pdf-file/0008/103112/OSTP-Data-Response.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2013.
36. Access vs. importance, a global study assessing the importance of and ease of access to professional and academic information. Phase I results. 2010. Publishing Research Consortium. Available at http://www.publishingresearch.net/ documents/PRCAccessvsImportanceGlobalNov2010-000.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2013.
37. Ware M. Access by UK small and medium-sized enterprises to professional and academic information, Mark Ware Consulting Ltd for Publishers Research Consortium (April 2009). Available at http://www.publishingresearch.net/ SMEaccess.htm. Accessed April 27, 2013.
38. B.C. Björk, and D. Solomon Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact BMC Med 10 2012 73
39. Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings. Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications, 2012. Available at www.researchinfonet.org/publish/finch/. Accessed April 27, 2013.
40. Ware M, Mabe M. The STM report - an overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. 3rd ed. The Hague, the Netherlands: International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers; 2012. Available at http://www.stm-assoc.org/2012-12-11-STM.Report-2012.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2013.
41. R. Van Noorden Britain aims for broad open access Nature 486 7403 2012 302 303
42. C. Haug The downside of open-access publishing N Engl J Med 368 9 2013 791 793
43. Beall J. Update: predatory open-access scholarly publishers. The Charleston Advisor 2010;12(1):50. Available at http://docserver.ingentaconnect. com/deliver/connect/charleston/15254011/v12n1/s20.pdf?expires=1369670962&id= 74361652&titleid=75002231&accname=Guest+User&checksum= 470CD69994C9A7D4245E2E97FD407000. Accessed April 27, 2013.
44. D. Butler Investigating journals: the dark side of publishing Nature 495 7442 2013 433 435
45. Kolata G. Scientific articles accepted (personal checks, too). New York Times. April 7, 2013. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/for- scientists-an-exploding-world-of-pseudo-academia.html?pagewanted=all&-r=0. Accessed April 27, 2013.
46. S. Pincock Publishing: open to possibilities Nature 495 7442 2013 539 541
47. The cost of knowledge. Available at http://thecostofknowledge.com/. Accessed April 27, 2013.
48. M.H. Oermann Editorial: impact factors and clinical specialty nursing journals J Clin Nurs 21 3-4 2012 299 300
49. L. Shen There are discipline-based differences in authors' perceptions towards open access publishing Evid Based Libr Inf Pract 6 3 2011 71 73
50. D.J. Solomon, and B.-C. Björk Publication fees in open access publishing: sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal J Am Soc Inf Sci 63 2012 98 107
51. H. Mercer Almost halfway there: an analysis of the open access behaviors of academic librarians Coll Res Libr 72 50 2011 443 453
52. M.G. Lyons Open access is almost here: navigating through copyright, fair use, and the TEACH Act. J Contin Educ Nurs 41 2 2010 57 64
53. Dallmeier-Thiessen S, Goerner B, Darby R, et al. Open access publishing - models and attributes. Available at http://www.iuwis.de/sites/default/files/ SOAP-OAP-models-attr-long.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2013.