Utility of a panel of sera for the alignment of test results in the worldwide multicenter study on reference values

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1007-1025

  Ichihara, Kiyoshi ^a   Ozarda, Yesim ^b   Klee, George ^c   Straseski, Joely ^d   Baumann, Nikola ^c   Ishikura, Kiyohide ^e  

^a YAMAGUCHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b ULUDAG UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^d ARUP LABORATORIES   (United States)

^e BECKMAN COULTER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Method comparison; Multicenter study; Panel of sera; Reduced major axis regression; Reference interval

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN; ALPHA FETOPROTEIN; AMYLASE; BILIRUBIN; CALCIUM; CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN; CHLORIDE; CHOLESTEROL; CREATININE; ESTRADIOL; FERRITIN; FOLIC ACID; FOLLITROPIN; GLUCOSE; HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; IRON; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; LUTEINIZING HORMONE; NITROGEN; PHOSPHATE; POTASSIUM; PREALBUMIN; PROLACTIN; PROTEIN; SODIUM; TRANSFERRIN; TRIACYLGLYCEROL; TUMOR MARKER; UREA; URIC ACID;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; CLINICAL CHEMISTRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HORMONE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMMUNOASSAY; LABORATORY TEST; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); NORMAL HUMAN; PANEL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; REFERENCE VALUE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAMPLE SIZE; UREA NITROGEN BLOOD LEVEL; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; BLOOD SPECIMEN COLLECTION; CALIBRATION; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; LABORATORIES; LINEAR MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY CONTROL; REFERENCE VALUES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84882239789     PISSN: 14346621     EISSN: 14374331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2013-0248     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ozarda Y, Ichihara K, Barth JH, Klee G. The protocol and standard operation procedures for common use in the worldwide multicenter study on reference values. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:1027-40.
2. Ludbrook J. Comparing methods of measurement. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1997;24:193-203.
3. McArdle BH. The structural relationship: regression in biology. Can J Zool 1988;66:2329-39.
4. Bohonak AJ. RMA: software for reduced major axis regression. Available from: http://www.bio.sdsu.edu/pub/andy/RMA.html. Accessed 23 April, 2012.
5. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Linear regression (type model II regression). In: Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd ed. New York, USA: WH Freeman, 1995:541-9.
6. Draper NR, Smith H. Applied regression analysis, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
7. Linnet K. Performance of Deming regression analysis in case of misspecified analytical error ratio in method comparison studies. Clin Chem 1998;44:1024-31.
8. Davison AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
9. Fraser CG. Biological variation: from principle to practice. Washington, DC: AACC Press, 2001.
10. Ichihara K, Ceriotti F, Tam TH, Sueyoshi S, Poon PM, Thong ML, et al. The Asian project for collaborative derivation of reference intervals: (1) strategy and major results of standardized analytes. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0421 [Epub ahead of print].
11. Ichihara K, Ceriotti F, Kazuo M, Huang YY, Shimizu Y, Suzuki H, et al. The Asian project for collaborative derivation of reference intervals: (2) results of non-standardized analytes and transference of reference intervals to the participating laboratories on the basis of cross-comparison of test results. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0422 [Epub ahead of print].
12. Linnet K. Necessary sample size for method comparison studies based on regression analysis. Clin Chem 1999;45: 882-94.
13. NCCLS. Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples: approved guideline, 2nd ed. NCCLS document EP9-A2. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2002.