Comparing methods of measurement

Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 193-203

  Ludbrook, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Correlation; Deming's method; Differences; Least products; Least squares; Model I regression; Model II regression; Random error; Residuals; Systemic bias

Indexed keywords

METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; THEORETICAL STUDY; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; STATISTICS;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELECTION BIAS; STATISTICS;

EID: 0030615216     PISSN: 03051870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1997.tb01807.x     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Berry WD. Understanding Regression Assumptions. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, 1993.
2. Berkson J. Are there two regressions? J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1950; 45: 164-80.
3. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH. Applied Linear Statistical Models, 3rd edn. Richard D Irwin Inc., Homewood, 1990.
4. Kendall MG, Stuart A. The Advanced Theory of Statistics. Vol. 2. Inference and Relationship, 3rd edn. Charles Griffin, London, 1961.
5. Brace RA. Fitting straight lines to experimental data. Am. J. Physiol. 1977; 233: R94-9.
6. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry, 2nd edn. WH Freeman, New York, 1981.
7. Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS. Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978.
8. Lehmann EL. Model specification: The views of Fisher and Neyman, and later developments. Stat. Sci. 1990; 5: 160-8.
9. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: The analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983; 32: 307-17.
10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i: 307-10.
11. Kirkeby OJ, Rise IR, Nordsletten L, Skjeldal S, Hall C, Risöe C. Cerebral blood flow measured with intracerebral laser-Doppler flow probes and radioactive microspheres. J. Appl. Physiol. 1995; 79: 1479-86.
12. Tschakovsky ME, Shoemaker JK, Hughson RL. Beat-by-beat forearm blood flow with Doppler ultrasound and strain-gauge plethysmography. J. Appl. Physiol. 1995; 79: 713-19.
13. Ricker WE. Linear regression in fishing research. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 1973; 30: 409-34.
14. Linnet K. Evaluation of regression procedures for methods comparison studies. Clin. Chem. 1993; 39: 424-32.
15. Linnet K. Estimation of the linear relationship between the measurements of two methods with proportional errors. Stat. Med. 1990; 9: 1463-73.
16. Cornbleet PJ, Gochman N. Incorrect least-squares regression coefficients in method-comparison analysis. Clin. Chem. 1979; 25: 432-8.
17. Feldmann U, Schneider B, Klinkers H, Haeckel R. A multivariate approach for the biometric comparison of analytical methods in clinical chemistry. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 1981; 19: 121-37.
18. Gould SJ. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 1966; 41: 587-640.
19. Kuhry B, Marcus LF. Bivariate linear models in biometry. Syst. Zool 1977; 26: 201-9.
20. Jolicoeur P, Mosimann JE. Intervalles de confiance pour la pente de l'axe majeur d'une distribution normale dimensionelle. Biom. Praxim. 1968; 9: 121-40.
21. Ricker WE. A note concerning Professor Jolicoeur's comments. J. Fish. Board Can. 1975; 32: 1494-6.
22. Daniel WW. Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978.
23. Chinn S. The assessment of methods of measurement. Stat. Med. 1990; 9: 351-62.
24. Close A, Hamilton G, Muriss S. Finger systolic pressure: Its use in screening for hypertension and monitoring. BMJ 1986; 293: 775-8.
25. White SW, Quail AW, De Leeuw PW et al. Impedance cardiography for cardiac output measurement: An evaluation of accuracy and limitations. Eur. Heart J. 1990; 11 (Suppl. I): 79-92.
26. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W et al. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems. J Hypertens. 1990; 8: 607-19.
27. Bland M, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: Why plotting difference against standard methods is misleading. Lancet 1995; 346: 1085-7.
28. Miller R, Bartolo DCC, James D, Mortensen NJMcC. Air-filled microballoon manometry for use in anorectal physiology. Br. J. Surg. 1989; 76: 72-5.
29. Vegfors M, Sjöberg F, Lindberg L-G, Gustafsson U, Lennmarken C. Basic studies of pulse oximetry in a rabbit model. Acta Anaesthiol. Scand. 1991; 35: 596-9.
30. Mengden T, Bättig B, Vetter W. Self-measurement of blood pressure improves the accuracy and reduces the number of subjects in clinical trials. J. Hypertens. 1991; 9 (Suppl. 6): S336-7.
31. Jones G, Wortberg M, Kreissig SB, Hammock BD, Rocke DM. Application of the bootstrap to calibration experiments. Analyt. Chem. 1996; 68: 763-70.
32. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York, 1993.
33. Feldman HA. Families of lines: Random effects in linear regression analysis. J. Appl. Physiol. 1988; 64: 1721-32.
34. Kelly GE. Use of the structural equations model in assessing the reliability of a new measurement technique. Appl. Stat. 1985; 34: 258-63.