Colonoscopy

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 444-449

  Rex, Douglas K ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT; SODIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE; SULFATE; WARFARIN;

ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLIP; COLON; COLON CANCER; COLONOSCOPE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FORCEPS; FULL SPECTRUM ENDOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HAZARD RATIO; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; LABORATORY TEST; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; POLYPECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REAL TIME ECHOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADENOMA; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84882238745     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.06.025     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. D.K. Rex, J.H. Bond, and S. Winawer Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Am J Gastroenterol 97 2002 1296 1308
2. M.F. Kaminski, J. Regula, and E. Kraszewska Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer N Engl J Med 362 2010 1795 1803
3. D.A. Corley, C. Jensen, and A.R. Marks Physician adenoma detection rate variability and subsequent colorectal cancer risk following a negative colonoscopy Gastroenterology 144 2013 S2 S3
4. N.N. Baxter, M.A. Goldwasser, and L.F. Paszat Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer Ann Intern Med 150 2009 1 8
5. H. Singh, Z. Nugent, and A.A. Demers The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer Gastroenterology 139 2010 1128 1137
6. H. Singh, Z. Nugent, and S.M. Mahmud Predictors of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy: a population-based study Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 663 673
7. N. Baxter, R. Sutradhar, and D.D. Forbes Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer Gastroenterology 140 2011 65 72
8. H. Brenner, J. Chang-Claude, and C.M. Seiler Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study Ann Intern Med 154 2011 22 30
9. N.N. Baxter, J.L. Warren, and M.J. Barrett Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty J Clin Oncol 30 2012 2664 2669
10. C. Kahi, L.J. Myers, and J.E. Slaven Endoscopic prevention of colorectal cancer in older individuals Gastroenterology 144 2013 S19
11. A. Shergill, E. Conners, and K.R. McQuaid Protective effect of open access colonoscopy against the development of right and left sided colon cancers Gastroenterology 144 2013 S20
12. C. Doubeni, S. Weinmann, K.F. Adams, and A. Kamineni Screening colonoscopy and risk of incident late-stage colorectal cancer diagnosis in average-risk adults: a nested case-control study (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB430
13. N.J. Samadder, K. Curtin, and T. Tuohy Prevalence and predictors of missed or interval colorectal cancer: a population-based study in Utah Gastroenterology 144 2013 S1 S2
14. D. Lieberman, J.L. Williams, and J.L. Holub Risk based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in blacks versus whites less than age 60 years: analysis of a national endoscopic database Gastroenterology 144 2013 S41
15. T. Imperiale, P.O. Monahan, and T.E. Stump A risk index to stratify the risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults Gastroenterology 144 2013 S138 S139
16. I.M. Gralnek, P.D. Siersema, and Z. Halpern Comparing Traditional Forward-Viewing Colonoscopy with "Full Spectrum Endoscopy": A Randomized, Multicenter Tandem Colonoscopy Study-The FUSE Study (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB2
17. J.C. van Rijn, J.B. Reitsma, and J. Stoker Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 343 350
18. D.K. Rex, S.N. Adler, and J. Aisenberg Accuracy of PillCam Colon 2 for detecting subjects with adenomas >6 mm (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB29
19. C. Spada, C. Hassan, and P. Cesaro Prospective trial of PillCam colon capsule (CCE) vs CT-colonography (CTC) in the evaluation of patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy (CC): an interim analysis (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB163
20. G.A. Paspatis, G. Tribonias, and K. Konstantinidis A prospective randomized comparison of cold vs hot snare polypectomy in the occurrence of postpolypectomy bleeding in small colonic polyps Colorectal Dis 13 2011 e345 e348
21. Y. Ichise, A. Horiuchi, and Y. Nakayama Prospective randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for small colorectal polyps Digestion 84 2011 78 81
22. P.V. Draganov, M.N. Chang, and A. Alkhasawneh Randomized, controlled trial of standard, large-capacity versus jumbo biopsy forceps for polypectomy of small, sessile, colorectal polyps Gastrointest Endosc 75 2012 118 126
23. C.K. Lee, J.-W. Kim, and J.-Y. Jang Cold SNARE polypectomy versus cold forceps polypectomy using double biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized controlled trial (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB2
24. F. Aslan, E. Alper, and S. Vatansever Cold SNARE polypectomy versus standard SNARE polypectomy in endoscopic treatment of small polyps (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB561
25. A. Horiuchi, and Y. Nakayama Prospective randomized comparison of cold SNARE polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for small colorectal polyps in patients receiving anticoagulation therapy (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB174
26. A. Aadam, C.J. Kahi, and Y. Oh Determinants of endoscopic versus surgical management of complex colorectal polyps: a multicenter video-based survey study (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB540 AB541
27. J. Hetzel, C.S. Huang, and J.A. Coukos Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 2656 2664
28. C.J. Kahi, D.G. Hewett, and D.L. Norton Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9 2011 42 46
29. M.A. Arain, M. Sawhney, and S. Sheikh CIMP status of interval colon cancers: another piece to the puzzle Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 1189 1195
30. H. Pohl, A. Srivastava, and S.P. Bensen Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the Complete Adenoma Resection (CARE) study Gastroenterology 144 2013 74 80
31. D.A. Lieberman, D.K. Rex, and S.J. Winawer Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Gastroenterology 143 2012 844 857
32. O. Khalid, S. Radaideh, and O.W. Cummings Reinterpretation of histology of proximal colon polyps called hyperplastic in 2001 World J Gastroenterol 15 2009 3767 3770
33. S. Morales, J.M. Kolb, and C.A. Bodian Modifications to serrated polyp handling after polypectomy improve histopathologic section quality and raise the diagnostic rate for advanced lesions (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB558
34. N. Burgess, K.S. Nanda, and S.J. Williams Comparison of large sessile serrated adenoma characteristics with conventional advanced mucosal neoplasia resected by wide field endoscopic mucosal resection in a multicenter prospective cohort (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB157
35. N. Burgess, A.J. Metz, and S.J. Williams Risk factors for intraprocedural and clinically significant delayed bleeding after wide field endoscopic mucosal resection of large colonic lesions: results from a multicenter cohort of 1050 patients (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB158
36. D.K. Rex, C. Kahi, and M. O'Brien The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps Gastrointest Endosc 73 2011 419 422
37. S. Patel, A. Rastogi, and G.L. Austin Learning curves using cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) for the histological characterization of diminutive colorectal polyps using a computer-based teaching module and narrow band imaging (NBI) videos: implications for resect and discard strategy (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB145
38. P. Basford, G.R. Longcroft-Wheaton, and P. Bhandari The learning curve for in-vivo characterisation of small colonic polyps: number needed to train (NNT) is 200 polyps (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB528
39. D.K. Rex Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps Gastroenterology 136 2009 1174 1181
40. N. Gupta, T. Kaltenbach, and T. Sato Diagnosis time determines the accuracy of optical diagnosis of diminutive polyp histology (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB553 AB554
41. M. Huffman, R.Z. Unger, and C. Thatikonda Split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy and residual gastric fluid volume: an observational study Gastrointest Endosc 72 2010 516 522
42. D. Agrawal, R. Robbins, and D.C. Rockey Gastric residual volume is trivial soon after polyethylene glycol bowel preparation (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB149 AB150
43. S. Mahadev, P.H. Green, and B. Lebwohl Rates of suboptimal preparation differ markedly between providers; impact on adenoma detection rates (abstract) Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 AB510 AB511