Public mobilization and policy consequences

Genomics and Society: Legal, Ethical and Social Dimensions

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 77-94

  Hampel, Jürgen ^a   Grabner, Petra ^b   Torgersen, Helge ^c   Boy, Daniel ^d   Allansdottir, Agnes ^e   Jelsøe, Erling ^f   Sakellaris, Georgios ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

^c ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

^d Centre for Political Research of Sciences   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^f ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^g INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882114840     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781849773867     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Allansdottir, A. et al (2001) 'Italy: From moral hazards to a cautious take on risks', in Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. (eds) Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, Science Museum, London, pp215-228
2. Bandelow, N. C. (1999) Advocacy-Koalitionen und politischer Wandel am Beispiel der Gentechnologiepolitik, edition sigma, Berlin
3. Bauer, M. W., Kohring, M., Allansdottir, A. and Gutteling, J. (2001) 'The dramatisation of biotechnology in elite mass media', in Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. W. (eds) Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, Science Museum, London, pp35-52
4. Bernauer, T. and Meins, E. (2003) 'Technological revolution meets policy and the market: Explaining cross-national differences in agricultural biotechnology regulation', European Journal of Political Research, vol 42, no 5, pp643-683
5. Bonfadelli, H. et al. (2001) 'Biotechnology in Switzerland: From street demonstrations to Regulations', Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, in Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. (eds) Science Museum, pp282-291
6. Boy, D. and de Cheveigné, S. (2001) 'Biotechnology: A menace to French food', Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, in Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M/ (eds) Science Museum Press, London, pp181-190
7. Budd, R. (1993) The Uses of Life: A History of Biotechnology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
8. Cantley, M. (1995) 'The regulation of modern biotechnology: A historical and European perspective', in Brauer, D. (ed.) Biotechnology, vol 12, VCH, New York, pp505-681
9. Crop Biotech Update (2002) EU-Stalemate on GM Labeling and Traceability, 30 October
10. Durant, J., Bauer, M. W. and Gaskell, G. (1998) Biotechnology in the Public Sphere: A European Sourcebook, Science Museum, London
11. Durant, J. and Lindsay, N. (1999) The Great GM Food Debate, Report to the House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, Science Museum, London
12. Einsiedel, E. et al. (2002) 'Brave new sheep -The clone named Dolly', in Bauer, M. W. and Gaskell, G. (eds) Biotechnology -The making of a global controversy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp313-347
13. Ernst & Young (2001) Integration, Ernst & Young's Eigth Annual European Life Sciences Report, Ernst & Young, London
14. Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. W. (eds) (2000) 'The years of controversy', in Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. (eds) Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, Science Museum, London
15. Gaskell, G., Bauer, M. and Durant, J. (eds) (1998) Biotechnology in the Public Sphere, Science Museum, London, pp3-12
16. Gaskell, G. et al (2001a) 'In the public eye: Representations of biotechnology in Europe', in Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. (eds) Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, Science Museum, London, pp53-79
17. Gaskell, G. et al (2001b) 'Troubled waters: The Atlantic divide on biotechnology policy', in Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. (eds) Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, Science Museum, London, pp96-115
18. Gaskell, G. et al (2001c) 'United Kingdom: Spilling the beans on genes', in Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. (eds) Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, Science Museum, London, pp292-306
19. Gaskell, G., Thompson, P. and Allum, N. (2002) 'Worlds apart? Public opinion in Europe and the USA', in Bauer, M. W. and Gaskell, G. (eds) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp351-375
20. Gaskell, G. et al. (2003) Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002, Eurobarometer 58.0 (2nd edition: 21 March), A report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the project 'Life Sciences in European Society' QLG7-CT-1999-00286
21. Grabner, P. et al (2001) 'Biopolitical diversity: The challenge of multilevel policymaking', in Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. (eds) Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, Science Museum Press, London, pp15-34
22. Grabner, P. and Torgersen, H. (1998) 'Gentechnik in Österreich -Technikkritik versus Modernisierung' in Wächter, Ch. (ed.) Technik Gestalten. Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu Technikforschung und Technologiepolitik, Profil, Munich, pp209-223
23. Gutteling, J. et al. (2001) 'The Netherlands: Controversy or consensus?' in Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. (eds) Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, Science Museum Press, London, pp229-236
24. Jasanoff, S. (1995) 'Product, process or programme: Three cultures and the regulation of biotechnology', in Bauer, M. (ed) Resistance to New Technology: Nuclear Power, Information Technology and Biotechnology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp311-331
25. Jelsøe, E. et al (2001) 'Denmark: The revival of national controversy over biotechnology', in in Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. (eds) Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, Science Museum Press, London, pp157-171
26. Kasperson, R.E. et al (2001) 'Stigma and the social amplification of risk', in Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Kunreuther, H. (eds) Risk, Media and Stigma, London and Sterling, VA.
27. Earthscan Kitschelt, H. (1991) 'Critique of the resource mobilization approach', in Rucht, D. (ed) Research on Social Movements: The State of the Art in Western Europe and the USA, Campus and Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp323-347
28. Kohring, M. (1997) Die Funktion des Wissenschaftsjournalismus: Ein systemtheoretischer Entwurf, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen
29. Kriesi, H. (2001) Die Rolle der Öffentlichkeit im politischen Entscheidungsprozess: Ein konzeptueller Rahmen für ein international vergleichendes Forschungsprojekt, Berlin, WZB working paper P01-701
30. Lassen, J. et al (2002) 'Testing times -The reception of Roundup Ready soya in Europe', in Bauer, M. W. and Gaskell, G. (eds) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 279-212.
31. Luhmann, N. (1998) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, 2 vols, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
32. Marris, C. (2000) Swings and roundabouts: 'French public policy on agricultural GMO since 1996', Notizie di Politeia, vol 16, no 60, pp22-37
33. Marris, C. (2001) Public Views on GMOs: Deconstructing Myths, EMBO reports, vol 2, no 7, pp545-548
34. Merton, R. K. (1995) 'The Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect', Social Forces, vol 2, no 74, pp379-424
35. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (ed) (2000) The Great GM Food Debate: A Survey of Media Coverage in the First Half of 1999, POST Report 138, May
36. Renn, O. (1992) 'The social arena concept of risk debates', in Krimsky, S. and Golding, G. (eds) Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, Westport, CT, and London, pp179-195
37. Rosenbrock, R. and Schaeffer, D. (eds) (2002) Die Normalisierung von Aids: Politik -Prävention -Krankenversorgung. Ergebnisse sozialwissenschaftlicher Aids-Forschung, vol 23, Berlin, edition sigma
38. Rucht, D. (ed) (1995) Research on Social Movements: The State of the Art in Western Europe and the USA, Campus, Frankfurt, and Westview, Boulder, CO
39. Rucht, D. (2001) 'Protest und Protestereignisanalyse: Einleitende Bemerkungen', in Rucht, D. (ed.) Protest in der Bundesrepublik. Strukturen und Entwicklungen, Campus, Frankfurt and New York, pp7-25
40. Sakellaris, G. and Chatjouli, A. (2001) 'Greece: losing faith in biotechnology', in Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. (eds) Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, Science Museum Press, London, pp204-214
41. Seifert, F. (2000) 'Österreichs Biotechnologiepolitik im EU-Mehrebenensystem -Zu Effectivität öffentlichen Widerstandes im supranationalen Gefüge', in Barben, D. and Abels, G. (eds) Biotechnologie und Globalisierung -Politische Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten transnationaler Technologieentwicklung, Sigma, Berlin, pp313-332
42. Seifert, F. (2002) Gentechnik -Offenlichkeit -Demokratie. Der österreichische Gentechnik-Konflikt im internationalen Kontext, Profil, Munich
43. Seifert, F. and Torgersen, H. (1997) 'How to keep out what we don´t want -An assessment of "Sozialverträglichkeit" under the Austrian Genetic Engineering Act', Public Understanding of Science, vol 6, no 2, pp301-327
44. Torgersen, H. (2002) 'Austria and the transatlantic agricultural biotechnology divide', Science Communications, vol 24, no 2, pp173-183
45. Torgersen, H. and Bogner, A. (2005) 'Austria's agri-biotechnology regulation: Political consensus despite divergent concepts of precaution', Science and Public Policy, vol 32, no 4, pp277-284
46. Torgersen, H. et al (2002a) 'Promises, problems and proxies: 25 years of European biotech debate and regulation', in Bauer, M. W. and Gaskell, G. (eds) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp21-94
47. Torgersen, H. et al (2002b) The Gate/Resonance Model: The Interface of Policy, Media and the Public in Technology Conflicts, ITA manuscript http://www.oeaw.ac.at/ita/pdf/ita_ 01_03.pdf
48. Wagner, W. et al (2001) 'Nature in disorder: The troubled public of biotechnology', in Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. W. (eds) Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, Science Museum, London, pp80-95
49. Wagner, W., Kronberger, N. and Seifert, F. (2002) 'Collective symbolic coping with new technology: Knowledge, images and public discourse', British Journal of Social Psychology, vol 41, pp323-343
50. Wolfsfeld, G. (1997) Media and Political Conflict: News from the Middle East, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge