Austria and the transatlantic agricultural biotechnology divide

Science Communication

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 173-183

  Torgersen, Helge ^a  

^a ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036458063     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107554702237843     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Austrian Ministry of Agriculture. 2001. Homepage in organically cultivated areas in the European Union [table], Retrieved from http://artifex.lfrz.at:8007/duz/enduser/results.jsp?outlang=0&bnr=23
2. Gaskell, G., N. Allum, W. Wagner, T. H. Nielsen, E. Jelsoe, M. Kohring, and M. Bauer. 2001 a. In the public eye: Representations of biotechnology in Europe. In Biotechnology in the public eye, edited by G. Gaskell and M. Bauer, 53-79. London: Science Museum.
3. Gaskell, G., E. Einsiedel, S. Priest, T. Ten Eyck, N. Allum, and H. Torgersen. 2001b. Troubled waters - The Atlantic divide on biotechnology policy. In Biotechnology in the public eye, edited by G. Gaskell and M. Bauer, 96-115. London: Science Museum.
4. Grabner, P., and H. Torgersen. 1998. Österreichs gentechnikpolitik - Technikkritische Vorreiterrolle oder modernisierungsverweigerung? Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 1:5-27.
5. Jasanoff, S. 1995. Product, process or programme: Three cultures and the regulation of biotechnology. In Resistance to new technology: Nuclear power, information technology and biotechnology, edited by M. Bauer, 311-31. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Montague, P. 1998. The precautionary principle. Rachel's Environment and Health Weekly. Available: http://www.biotech-info.net/rachels_586.html
7. Priest, S. 2000. US public opinion divided over biotechnology? Nature Biotechnology 18:939-42.
8. Torgersen, H., C. Egger, P. Grabner, N. Kronberger, F. Seifert, P. Weger, and W. Wagner. 2001. Austria: Narrowing the gap to Europe. In Biotechnology 1996-2000: The years of controversy, edited by G. Gaskell and M. Bauer, 131-44. London: Science Museum.
9. Torgersen, H., J. Hampel, M.-L. von Bergmann-Winberg, E. Bridgman, J. Durant, E. Einsiedel, B. Fjaestad, G. Gaskell, P. Grabner, P. Hieber, E. Jelsoe, J. Lassen, A. Marouda-Chatjoulis, T. Nielsen, T. Rusanen, G. Sakellaris, F. Seifert, C. Smink, T. Twardowski, and M. W. Kamara. 2002. Promise, problems and proxies: 25 years of European debate and regulation. In Biotechnology: The making of a global controversy, edited by M. W. Bauer and G. Gaskell, 21-94. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Torgersen, H., and F. Seifert. 1997. Aversion preceding rejection: Results of the Eurobarometer survey 39.1 on biotechnology and genetic engineering in Austria. Public Understanding of Science 6:1-12.
11. _. 2000. Precautionary blockage of agricultural biotechnology. Journal of Risk Research 3 (3): 209-217.
12. Wagner, W., N. Kronberger, G. Gaskell, A. Allansdottir, N. Allum, S. de Cheveigné, U. Dahinden, C. Diego, L. Montali, A. T. Mortensen, U. Pfenning, T. Rusanen, and N. Seger. 2001. Nature in disorder: The troubled public of biotechnology. In Biotechnology in the public eye, edited by G. Gaskell and M. Bauer, 80-95. London: Science Museum.