Developing country consumers' demand for food safety and quality: Is Mumbai ready for certified and organic fruits?

Choice Experiments in Developing Countries: Implementation, Challenges and Policy Implications

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 261-277

  Roy, Devesh ^a   Birol, Ekin ^a   Deffner, Katharina ^b   Karandikar, Bhushana ^c  

^a INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Mahagrapes ^*  (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882045651     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Annett, L.E., V. Muralidharan, P.C. Boxall, S.B. Cash and W.v. Wismer (2008), 'Influence of health and environmental information on hedonic evaluation of organic and conventional bread', Journal of Food Science, 73 (4), H50-H57.
2. Bateman, I.J., R.T. Carson, B. Day, W.M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, T. Hett, M. Jones-Lee, G. Loomes, S. Mourato, E. Ozdemiroglu, D.W. Pearce, R. Sugden and S. Swanson (2003), Guidelines for the Use of Stated Preference Techniques for the Valuation of Preferences for Non-market Goods, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
3. Bennett, J.J. and R.K. Blarney (2001), The Choice of Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
4. Burton, M., M. Rigby, T. Young and S. James (2001), 'Consumer attitudes to genetically modified organisms in the UK', European Review of Agricultural Economics, 28 (4),479-98.
5. Carlsson, F., P. Frykblom and C.J. Lagerkvist (2005), 'Consumer preferences for food product quality attributes from Swedish agriculture', Ambio, 34 (4-5), 366-70.
6. Carlsson, F., P. Frykblom and C.J. Lagerkvist (2007), 'Consumer benefits of labels and bans on GM foods - choice experiments with Swedish consumers', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89 0), 152-61.
7. Central Intelligence Agency (2008), The World Factbook, https:llwww.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbooklindex.html, accessed 7 December 2009.
8. Ehmke, M.D., J.L. Lusk and W. Tyner (2008), 'Measuring the relative importance of preferences for country of origin in China, France, Niger and the United States', Agricultural Economics, 38, 277-86.
9. Enneking, U. (2004), 'Willingness-to-pay for safety improvements in the German meat sector: the case of the Q&S label', European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31 (2),205-23.
10. Ernst & Young (2006), The Great Indian Retail Story, http://www.ey.comlGlobal/assets.nsf/S weden/The_Great_Indian_Retail_Storyl$file/The%20Great%20Indian%20 Retail%20Story.pdf, accessed 10 July 2008.
11. Goldberg, I. and J. Roosen (2007), 'Scope insensitivity in health risk reduction studies: a comparison of choice experiments and the contingent valuation method for valuing safer food', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 34 (2), 123-44.
12. Government of India (2001), http://www.censusindia.gov.in, accessed 25 June 2008.
13. Hensher, D., J. Rose and W. Greene (2005), Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Krishna, V. and M. Qaim (2008), 'Consumer attitudes toward GM food and pesticide residues in India', Review of Agricultural Economics, 30 (2), 233-51.
15. Lagerkvist, C.1., F. Carlsson and D. Viske (2006), 'Swedish consumer preferences for animal welfare and biotech: a choice experiment', AgBioForum, 9 (1), 51-58.
16. Loureiro, Maria L. and Wendy J. Umberger (2007), 'A choice experiment model: what consumer preferences tell us about food safety and labeling', Food Policy, 32 (4), 496-514.
17. Loureiro, M.L., A. Gracia and R.M. Nayga Jr. (2006), 'Do consumers value nutritional labels?' European Review of Agricultural Economics, 33 (2),249-68.
18. Loureiro, M.L., J.1. McCluskey and R.C. Mittelhammer (2002), 'Will consumers pay a premium for eco-Iabeled apples?', Journal of Consumer Affairs, 36 (2), 203-19.
19. Louviere, J.1., DA. Hensher, J.D. Swait and W.L. Adamowicz (2000), Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Lusk J.L., J. Roosen and JA. Fox (2003), 'Demand for beef from cattle administered growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn: a comparison of consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84 (6), 16-29.
21. National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) (2007), Quarterly Review - Review of the Economy, August, New Delhi
22. Owen, K, J. Louviere and J. Clark (2005), 'Impact of Genetic Engineering on Consumer Demand', Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, http://www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/GLC/05-015.pdf. accessed 18 March 2008.
23. Rigby, D. and M. Burton (2005), 'Preference heterogeneity and GM food in the UK', European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32 (2), 269-88.
24. Scarpa, R. and T. Del Giudice (2004), 'Market segmentation via mixed logit: extra-virgin olive oil in urban Italy', Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, 2 (1), 141-60.
25. Scarpa, R., G. Philippidis and F. Spalatro (2005), 'Product-country images and preference heterogeneity for Mediterranean food products: a discrete choice framework', Agribusiness, 21 (3),329-49.
26. Zimmerman C.c. (1932), 'Ernst Engel's law of expenditures for food source', The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 47 (1), 78-101.