Can we link policy practice with research on "STIG systems"? Toward connecting the analysis of science, technology and innovation policy with realistic programs for economic development and growth1

The New Economics of Technology Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 46-71

  Aghion, Philippe ^a   David, Paul A ^b,c   Foray, Dominique ^d  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CEMI   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881932467     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Aghion, P. and P. Howitt (1998), Endogenous Growth Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Aghion, P. and P. Howitt (2005), "Appropriate growth policy: a unifying framework", the 2005 J.A. Schumpeter lecture, 20th Annual Congress of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam.
3. Arrow, K.J. (1962), "Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions", in NBER (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 609-25.
4. Bresnahan, T.F. (2003), "The mechanisms of information technology"s contribution to economic growth", in J.-P. Touffut (ed.), Institutions, Innovation and Growth, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 116-41.
5. Bresnahan, T.F. and M. Trajtenberg (1995), "General purpose technologies: engines of growth", Journal of Econometrics, 65, 83-108.
6. Dasgupta, P. and P.A. David (1994), "Toward a new economics of science", Research Policy, 23 (5), 487-521.
7. Dasgupta, P. and E. Maskin (1987), "The simple economics of research portfolios", Economic Journal, 97 (387), 581-95.
8. David, P.A. (1991), "General purpose engines, investment, and productivity growth: from the dynamo revolution to the computer revolution", in E. Deiaco, E. Hörnel and G. Vickery (eds), Technology and Investment: Crucial Issues for the 90s, London: Pinter Publishers, pp. 141-54.
9. David, P.A. (1993), "Knowledge, property and the system dynamics of technological change", in L. Summers and S. Shah (eds), Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics: 1992, (Supplement to the World Bank Economic Review), Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, pp. 215-48.
10. David, P.A. (1994), "Why are institutions the "carriers of history"? Path-dependence and the evolution of conventions, organisations and institutions", Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5 (2), 205-20.
11. David, P.A. (2007a), "Economic policy analysis and the Internet: coming to terms with a telecommunications anomaly", in C. Ciborra, R.E. Mansell, D. Quahand R. Silverstone (eds), Oxford Handbook on Information and Communication Technologies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 148-67.
12. David, P.A. (2007b), "Innovation and Europe"s academic institutions: second thoughts about embracing the Bayh-Dole Regime", in F. Malerba and S. Brusoni (eds), Perspectives on Innovation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251-78. (Preprint available as SIEPR Policy Paper 04-027 at: http://siepr.stanford.edu/papers/pdf/04-27.html.)
13. David, P.A. and B.H. Hall (2006), "Property and the pursuit of knowledge: IPR issues affecting scientifi c research", Research Policy, 35 (6), (Special Issue, Guestedited by P.A. David and B.H. Hall), 767-71.
14. David, P.A. and G. Wright (2003), "General purpose technologies and surges in productivity: historical reflections on the future of the ICT revolution", in P.A. David and M. Thomas (eds), The Economic Future in Historical Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, pp. 135-66.
15. Helpman, E. (ed.) (1998), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Jaffe, A.B., R.G. Newell and R.N. Stavins (2003), "Technology policy for energy and the environment", Paper from the NBER Meeting on Innovation Policy and the Economy, April.
17. Klette, J. and J. Moen (2000), "From growth theory to technology policy: coordination problems in theory and practice", University of Oslo, draft.
18. Matsuyama, K. (1998), "Economic development as coordination problems", in M. Aoki, H.-K. Kim and M. Okuno-Fujiwara (eds), The Role of Government in East Asian Economic Development: Comparative Institutional Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 134-60.
19. Mowery, D.C. (2006), "Lessons from the history of federal R&D policy for an "Energy Arpa"", Committee on Science, US House of Representatives.
20. Nelson, R.R. (1959), "The simple economics of basic scientific research", Journal of Political Economy, 67, 297-306.
21. Owen-Smith, J. and W.W. Powell (2001), "Careers and contradictions: faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences", Research in the Sociology of Work, 10 (Special Issue on "The Transformation of Work", ed. Steven Vallas), 109-140.
22. Romer, P.M. (1990), "Endogenous technological change", Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5), S71-S102.
23. Sah, R.K. and J.E. Stiglitz (1988), "Committees, hierarchies and polyarchies", The Economic Journal, 98 (39), 451-70.
24. Stern, N. (2006), The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, HM Treasury, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.