Innovation and Europe's academic institutions – second thoughts about embracing the Bayh–Dole regime

Perspectives on Innovation

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 251-278

  David, Paul A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 76049104491     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511618390.013     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. AUTM 2003. Licensing Survey: FY 2002. Norwalk, CT: Association of University Technology Manager Manager, Inc
2. Balconi, M., Breschi, S., and Lissoni, F. 2003. “IL transferimento di conoscenze technologiche deall’universita all’ Industria in Itaila: Nuova evidenze sui bervetti di patenit dei docenti”, in A. Bonacorse (ed.), ll sistema della ricera pubblica in Italia, Milano: Franco Angeli
3. Balconi, M., Breschi, S., and Lissoni, F. 2004. “Networks of Inventors and Their Role of Academia: An Exploration of Patent Data,” Research Policy, 33(1): pp. 127–145.
4. Branstetter, L. 2004. “Exploring the Link Between Academic Science and Industrial Innovation: The Case of California’s Research Universities,” Columbia University Business School Working Paper, forthcoming in Annales d’Economie et de Statistique.
5. Cobban, A. B. 1988. Europe’s Medieval Universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press
6. Dasgupta, P. and David, P. A. 1994. “Towers a New Economics of Science,” Research Policy 23: 487–521
7. David, P. A. 2003. “The Economic Logic of ‘Open Secience’ and the Balance Between Private Property Rights and the Public Domain in Scientific Data and Information,” in J. M. Esau and P. F. Uhlir (eds.), The Role of Scientific and Technical Data and Information in the Public Domain. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press
8. Eisenberg, R. S.2001. Bargaining over the Transfer of Proprietary Research Tools: Is This Market Emerging or Failing?,” in D. I. Zimmerman, R. C. Dreyfuss, and H. First (eds.), Expanding the Bounds of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press
9. European Commision 2003. Communication from the Commission: The Role of the University in the Europe of Knowledge, COM (2003) 58 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Commmunities (5 February), 2003
10. Geuna, A. and Nesta, L. 2006. “University Patenting and Its Effects on Academic Research: The Emerging European” Research Policy 35 (June–July) [Special Issue on Property and the Pursuit of Knowledge: IPR Issues Affecting Scientific Research, P. A. David and B. H. Hall (eds.)]
11. Hertzfeld, H. R., Link, A. N., and Vonortas, N. S. 2006.“Intellectual Property Production Mechanisms in Research Partnerships” Research Policy 35 (June–July) [Special Issue on Property and the Pursuit of Knowledge: IPR Issues Affecting Scientific Research, P. A. David and B. H. Hall(eds.)]
12. Horton, Richard 2004. “The Dawn of McScience,” The New York Review of Books 1.1(4): 7
13. Mowery, D. C. and Sampat, B. 2003. “The Bayh–Dole Act of 1980 and University Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for other OECD Governments?,” Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1): pp. 115–127
14. Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., and Siedonis, A. A. 2004. Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University–Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh–Dole Act. Standford, C.A: Standford University Press
15. Nelson, R. R. 2001. “Observations on the Post-Bayh–Dole rise of patenting American University,” Journal of Technology Transfer 26: 1319
16. OECD 2002. Benchmarking Science-Industry Relationships. Paris: OECD
17. Pavitt, K. 2002. “Changing Patterns of Usefulness of University Research: Opportunities and dangers.” Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex: Prepard for the Noble Symposium 123: Science and Industry in the Twentieth Century, Stockholm, 21–3 November
18. Riemers, N. 1987. “Tiger by the Tail,” Chemtech 17 (8): 464–71
19. Sampat, B. N. 2004. “Patening and U. S. Academic Research in the Twentieth Century: The World Before and After Bayh–Dole” Research Policy (35) (June–July) [Special Issue on Property and the Pursuit of Knowledge: IPR Issues Affecting Scientific Research, P. A. David and B. H. Hall (eds.)]. Trune, D. and Goslin, L. 1998. “University Technology Transfer Programs: A Profit/Loss Analysis,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change: 197–204
20. Walsh, J. P., Arora, A., and Cohen, W. M. 2003. “Research Tools Patenting and Licensing and Biomedical Innovation,” in W. M. Chen and S. Merril (eds.), The Patent System in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press