Regulatory impact assessment: Ambition, design and politics

Handbook on the Politics of Regulation

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 397-410

  Wegrich, Kai ^a  

^a HERTIE SCHOOL OF GOVERNANCE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881916128     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Allio, L. (2008), 'The emergence of better regulation in the European Union', Ph.D. thesis, King's College London.
2. Baldwin, R. (2010), 'Better regulation: the search and the struggle', in R. Baldwin, M. Cave and M. Lodge (eds), Oxford Handbook of Regulation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 259-78.
3. Coglianese, C., H. Kilmartin and E. Mendelson (2009), 'Transparency and public participation in the federal rulemaking process: recommendations for the new administration', George Washington Law Review, 77, 924-72.
4. Croley, S.P. (2008), Regulation and Public Interest: The Possibility of Good Regulatory Government, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
5. Döhler, M. (2002), 'Institutional choice and bureaucratic autonomy in Germany', West European Politics, 25 (1), 101-24.
6. European Commission (2008), Impact Assessment on the Standards of Quality and Safety of Human Organs Intended for Transplantation, SEC/2008/2956.
7. European Commission (2009a), Impact Assessment Guidelines 2009, SEC/2009/92.
8. European Commission (2009b), Impact Assessment on Setting Emission Performance Standards for New Light Commercial Vehicles as Part of the Community's Integrated Approach to Reduce CO2 Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles, SEC/2009/1454.
9. European Commission (2010a), Impact Assessment Board Report for 2009, SEC/2009/1728.
10. European Commission (2010b), Impact Assessment - Background, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/govern ance/impact/background/background_en.htm (accessed 11 October 2010).
11. European Court of Auditors (2009), Impact Assessments in the EU Institutions: Do They Support Decision Making?, Special Report No. 3/2010.
12. Hood, C. (1998), The Art of the State: Cul ture, Rhetoric and Public Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Lindblom, C.E. (1979), 'Still muddling, not yet through', Public Administration Review, 39, 517-26.
14. Lodge, M. and K. Wegrich (2009), 'High- quality regulation: its popularity, its tools and its future', Public Money and Management, 29 (3), 145-52.
15. Lodge, M. and C. Hood (2010), 'Regulation inside government: retro- theory vindicated or outdated?', in R. Baldwin, M. Cave and M. Lodge (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Regulation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 590-611.
16. Meuwese, A.C.M. (2008), 'Impact assessment in EU lawmaking', Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit Leiden.
17. National Audit Office (NAO) (2009), Delivering High- Quality Impact Assessments, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 128 2008-09, London: Stationary Office.
18. OECD (2002), Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.
19. OECD (2009), Regulatory Impact Analysis: A Tool for Policy Coherence, Paris: OECD.
20. Prosser, T. (2010), The Regulatory Enterprise: Government, Regulation, and Legitimacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Radaelli, C.M. (2007), 'Whither better regulation for the Lisbon Agenda?', Journal of European Public Policy, 14 (2), 190-207.
22. Radaelli, C.M. (2010), 'Regulating rule- making via impact assessment', Governance, 23 (1), 89-108.
23. Radaelli, C.M. and F. De Francesco (2010), 'Regulatory impact assessment', in M. Cave, R. Baldwin and M. Lodge (eds), Oxford Handbook of Regulation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 279-301.
24. Radaelli, C.M. and A.C.M. Meuwese (2010), 'Hard questions, hard solutions: proceduralisation through impact assessment in the EU', West European Politics, 33 (1), 136-53.
25. Reagan, M.D. (1987), Regulation: The Policy of Politics, Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
26. Renda, A. (2006), Impact Assessment in the EU: The State of the Art and the Art of the State, Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
27. Stigler, G.J. (1971), 'The theory of economic regulation', Bell Journal of Economics, 2 (1), 3-21.
28. The Evaluation Partnership (TEP) (2007), Evaluation of the Commission's Impact Assessment System, Richmond: TEP.
29. Torriti, J. (2010), 'Impact assessment and the liberalization of the EU energy markets: evidence- based policy- making or policy- based evidence- making?', Journal of Common Market Studies, 48 (4), 1065-81.
30. UK Better Regulation Executive (2010), Impact Assessment Toolkit, London: UK Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
31. Veit, S. (2010), Bessere Gesetze durch Folgenabschätzung? Deutschland und Schweden im Vergleich, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
32. Viscusi, W.K. (2009), 'The devaluation of life', Regulation & Governance, 3 (2), 103-27.
33. Wollmann, H. (1989), 'Policy analysis in West Germany's federal government: a case of unfinished governmental and administrative modernization?', Governance, 2 (3), 233-66.
34. World Bank (2010), Regulatory Governance in Developing Countries, Washington, DC: Better Regulation for Growth, World Bank Group.