Automated analysis of FDG PET as a tool for single-subject probabilistic prediction and detection of Alzheimer's disease dementia

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Volumn 40, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1394-1405

  Arbizu, Javier ^a   Prieto, E ^a   Martinez Lage P ^a,d   Marti Climent J M ^a   Garcia Granero M ^b   Lamet, I ^a   Pastor, P ^a   Riverol, M ^a   Gomez Isla M T ^a,e   Penuelas I ^a   Richter, J A ^a   Weiner, M W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Fundacion CITA Alzheimer   (Spain)

^e MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Dementia; FDG; Mild cognitive impairment; PET; Prediction

Indexed keywords

APOLIPOPROTEIN E4; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

AGED; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN METABOLISM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; MALE; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION; NEUROIMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; POSTERIOR CINGULATE; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TEMPORAL LOBE; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; BRAIN; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS;

EID: 84881670522     PISSN: 16197070     EISSN: 16197089     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2458-z     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, Cummings JL, DeKosky ST, Barberger-Gateau P, et al. Revising the definition of Alzheimer's disease: a new lexicon. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:1118-27.
2. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack Jr CR, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:263-9.
3. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer Dement. 2011;7:270-9
4. Sperling RA, Johnson KA. Dementia: new criteria but no new treatments. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:4-5.
5. Bohnen NI, Djang DSW, Herholz K, Anzai Y, Minoshima S. Effectiveness and safety of 18F-FDG PET in the evaluation of dementia: a review of the recent literature. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:59-71.
6. Landau S, Harvey D, Madison C, Reiman E, Foster N, Aisen P, et al. Comparing predictors of conversion and decline in mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2010;75:230-8.
7. Minoshima S, Frey KA, Koeppe RA, Foster NL, Kuhl DE. A diagnostic approach in Alzheimer's disease using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections of fluorine-18-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1238-48.
8. Herholz K, Salmon E, Perani D, Baron JC, Holthoff V, Frolich L, et al. Discrimination between Alzheimer dementia and controls by automated analysis of multicenter FDG PET. Neuroimage. 2002;17:302-16.
9. Landau SM, Harvey D, Madison CM, Koeppe RA, Reiman EM, Foster NL, et al. Associations between cognitive, functional, and FDG-PET measures of decline in AD and MCI. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32:1207-18.
10. Chen K, Ayutyanont N, Langbaum JB, Langbaum J, Fleisher AS, Reschke C, et al. Characterizing Alzheimer's disease using a hypometabolic convergence index. Neuroimage. 2011;56:52-60
11. Shaffer JL, Petrella JR, Sheldon FC, Choudhury KR, Calhoun VD, Coleman RE, et al. Predicting cognitive decline in subjects at risk for Alzheimer disease by using combined cerebrospinal fluid, MR Imaging, and PET biomarkers. Radiology. 2013;266:583-91
12. Caroli A, Prestia A, Chen K, Ayutyanont N, Landau SM, Madison CM, et al. Summary metrics to assess Alzheimer disease-related hypometabolic pattern with 18F-FDG PET: head-to-head comparison. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:592-600
13. Herholz K, Westwood S, Haense C, Dunn G. Evaluation of a calibrated 18F-FDG PET score as a biomarker for progression in Alzheimer Disease and mild cognitive impairment. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1218-26.
14. Cruchaga C, Fernández-Seara MA, Seijo-Martínez M, Samaranch L, Lorenzo E, Hinrichs A, et al. Cortical atrophy and language network reorganization associated with a novel progranulin mutation. Cerebral Cortex. 2009;19:1751-60.
15. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology. 1984;34:939-44.
16. Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med. 2004;256:183-94.
17. Wahlund L, Barkhof F, Fazekas F, Bronge L, Augustin M, Sjögren M, et al. A new rating scale for age-related white matter changes applicable to MRI and CT. Stroke. 2001;32:1318-22.
18. Pascual B, Prieto E, Arbizu J, Marti-Climent J, Olier J, Masdeu JC. Brain glucose metabolism in vascular white matter disease with dementia: differentiation from Alzheimer disease. Stroke. 2010;41:2889-93.
19. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline J, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp. 1994;2:189-210.
20. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002;15:273-89.
21. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000. p. 91-142.
22. Fox J. Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008. p. 587-606.
23. Perrin RJ, Fagan AM, Holtzman DM. Multimodal techniques for diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease. Nature. 2009;461:916-22.
24. Weiner MW, Veitch DP, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Cairns NJ, Green RC, et al. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: a review of papers published since its inception. Alzheimers Dement. 2012;8:S1-68.
25. Drzezga A, Grimmer T, Henriksen G, Mühlau M, Perneczky R, Miederer I, et al. Effect of APOE genotype on amyloid plaque load and gray matter volume in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2009;72:1487-94.
26. Pievani M, Galluzzi S, Thompson PM, Rasser PE, Bonetti M, Frisoni GB. APOE4 is associated with greater atrophy of the hippocampal formation in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage. 2011;55:909-19.
27. Chen K, Ayutyanont N, Langbaum JB, Langbaum J, Fleisher AS, Reschke C, et al. Correlations between FDG PET glucose uptake-MRI gray matter volume scores and apolipoprotein E ε4 gene dose in cognitively normal adults: a cross-validation study using voxel-based multi-modal partial least squares. Neuroimage 2012;60:2316-22
28. Reiman EM, Uecker A, Caselli RJ, Lewis S, Bandy D, De Leon MJ, et al. Hippocampal volumes in cognitively normal persons at genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol. 1998;44:288-91.
29. Drzezga A, Grimmer T, Riemenschneider M, Lautenschlager N, Siebner H, Alexopoulus P, et al. Prediction of individual clinical outcome in MCI by means of genetic assessment and 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1625-32.
30. Mosconi L, Perani D, Sorbi S, Herholz K, Nacmias B, Holthoff V, et al. MCI conversion to dementia and the APOE genotype: a prediction study with FDG-PET. Neurology. 2004;63:2332-40.
31. Schuff N, Woerner N, Boreta L, Kornfield T, Shaw L, Trojanowski J, et al. MRI of hippocampal volume loss in early Alzheimer's disease in relation to ApoE genotype and biomarkers. Brain. 2009;132:1067-77.
32. Bouwman FH, Verwey NA, Klein M, Kok A, Blankenstein M, Sluimer J, et al. New research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease applied in a memory clinic population. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;30:1-7.
33. Schoonenboom NSM, van der Flier WM, Blankenstein MA, Bouwman FH, Van Kamp GJ, Barkhof F, et al. CSF and MRI markers independently contribute to the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2008;29:669-75.
34. Minoshima S, Giordani B, Berent S, Frey KA, Foster NL, Kuhl DE. Metabolic reduction in the posterior cingulate cortex in very early Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol. 1997;42:85-94.
35. Mosconi L. Brain glucose metabolism in the early and specific diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. FDG-PET studies in MCI and AD. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:486-510.
36. Jack Jr CR, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Shaw LM, Aisen PS, Weiner MW, et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer's pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:119-28.
37. Pagani M, Dessi B, Morbelli S, Brugnolo A, Salmaso D, Piccini A, et al. MCI patients declining and not-declining at mid-term follow-up: FDG-PET findings. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2010;7:287-94.
38. Drzezga A, Lautenschlager N, Siebner H, Riemenschneider M, Willoch F, Minoshima S, et al. Cerebral metabolic changes accompanying conversion of mild cognitive impairment into Alzheimer's disease: a PET follow-up study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:1104-13.
39. Yakushev I, Schreckenberger M, Müller MJ, Schermuly I, Cumming P, Stoeter P, et al. Functional implications of hippocampal degeneration in early Alzheimer's disease: a combined DTI and PET study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:2219-27.
40. Morbelli S, Drzezga A, Perneczky R, Frisoni GB, Caroli A, van Berckel BN, et al. Resting metabolic connectivity in prodromal Alzheimer's disease. A European Alzheimer Disease Consortium (EADC) project. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33:2533-50